Re: [PD] Gem, Particles, a tail?

2009-01-20 Thread PSPunch 

Andrew,


I think updating the coordinates of [part_source] by sending it 
arguments, rather than inserting a [translate] in the chain should work.


--
David Shimamoto


 Dear all
 
 I'm attempting to create a gem graphing application. in essence I want 
 objects to the right of the screen (moved by incoming data) with 
 particles moving to the left, and so leaving a visible tail of 
  particles moving to the left and showing where the source object has 
 recently moved. The trouble is that a translate object anywhere in the 
 particle chain not only moves the source but all the particles in the 
 same direction. Does anyone know how I can move the source object but 
 leave existing particles on their current course?
 
 God Bless
 
 Andrew
 
 
 Are you a PC?  Upload your PC story and show the world Click Here! 
 http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/122465942/direct/01/
 
 
 
 
 ___
 Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
 UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
 http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

[PD] Gem, Particles, a tail?

2009-01-19 Thread Andrew Faraday 

Dear allI'm attempting to create a gem graphing application. in essence I want 
objects to the right of the screen (moved by incoming data) with particles 
moving to the left, and so leaving a visible tail of  particles moving to the 
left and showing where the source object has recently moved. The trouble is 
that a translate object anywhere in the particle chain not only moves the 
source but all the particles in the same direction. Does anyone know how I can 
move the source object but leave existing particles on their current course?God 
BlessAndrew
_
Choose the perfect PC or mobile phone for you
http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/130777504/direct/01/___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list