Re: [PD] Pd 0.43-0 test +Gridflow (was Gridflow+ L2Ork pd-extended)

[Mathieu Bouchard]

On Wed, 23 Feb 2011, ALAN BROOKER wrote:

Thanks, yes wanted to see if it was compatible at your end- just to give 
some brief feedback,-I have actually been using Gridflow + vanilla Pd 
0.43-0 (test 3) on Ubuntu and it works mostly. The big issue for me was 
the help index, which would completely crash PD when selected, but PD 
0.43 is a test release I suppose. So for me, other than the help index 
(and perhaps some examples which crashed PD)  it is usable


Well, that 0.43 is a test release is not a reason to leave it like that, 
it's one more reason to have it fixed quickly.


But GF's TODO list is large and is only getting larger.

OTOH, I've already finished the work of getting GEM 93 and GEM 92 
compatibility at once in the same binaries... regardless of how many 
people think that it's not important or too much trouble to get it 
working. (That was last year already)


GF-GEM bridge for Win32 is another tough compatibility topic whose time 
is coming. (We once had it working, but it was a brittle GEM92-only hack)


 ___
| Mathieu Bouchard  tél: +1.514.383.3801  Villeray, Montréal, QC
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

[PD] Pd 0.43-0 test +Gridflow (was Gridflow+ L2Ork pd-extended)

[ALAN BROOKER]

Hi

Thanks, yes wanted to see if it was compatible at your end- just to
give some brief feedback,-I have actually been using Gridflow +
vanilla Pd 0.43-0 (test 3) on Ubuntu and it works mostly. The big
issue for me was the help index, which would completely crash PD when
selected, but PD 0.43 is a test release I suppose. So for me, other
than the help index (and perhaps some examples which crashed PD)  it
is usable



On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Mathieu Bouchard ma...@artengine.ca wrote:
 On Tue, 22 Feb 2011, ALAN BROOKER wrote:

 tried quickly L2Ork with Gridflow 9.14 and both are working great-big
 thanks :)

 I haven't done any testing nor debugging with L20rk, and AFAIK, I haven't
 fixed anything that caused a problem with L20rk. This means that the bug is
 probably still there, and might pop in your face, probably only in a future
 release. This is unless I fixed it by accident.

 Off topic Mathieu but has Gridflow  9.14 been tested with  the vanilla
 Pd  0.43-0 test versions?

 It's been tried and it doesn't work. It's currently hard to debug, so, I
 want to make some big changes to the [doc_...] abstractions to make it
 easier to put my finger on the bug. Either that or hack pd again so that it
 tells me real error messages in those circumstances.

  ___
 | Mathieu Bouchard  tél: +1.514.383.3801  Villeray, Montréal, QC

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list