Re: [PD] Splitting Objects
On 09/25/2012 09:18 AM, Funs Seelen wrote: Hi Thomas, On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Thomas Mayer tho...@residuum.org wrote: Is there any pitfall to that approach? One thing I need to take care for are creation arguments. Anything else I need to consider? Speaking about creation arguments: if none are given for abstractions the default value is always 0 (at least I never figured out a way to give another default value *). For C-objects it is possible to use any float value as default. --Funs *) doing it this way the float object contains nothing, i.e. a zero, if no creation arguments are passed: [loadbang] | [f $1] Look at purepd/float_argument, purepd/any_argument, and purepd/symbol_argument if you want to have more control over defaults for abstractions. I think iemguts also has some stuff there. .hc ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Splitting Objects
Hi Thomas, On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Thomas Mayer tho...@residuum.org wrote: Is there any pitfall to that approach? One thing I need to take care for are creation arguments. Anything else I need to consider? Speaking about creation arguments: if none are given for abstractions the default value is always 0 (at least I never figured out a way to give another default value *). For C-objects it is possible to use any float value as default. --Funs *) doing it this way the float object contains nothing, i.e. a zero, if no creation arguments are passed: [loadbang] | [f $1] ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Splitting Objects
- Mail original - De: Funs Seelen funssee...@gmail.com Speaking about creation arguments: if none are given for abstractions the default value is always 0 (at least I never figured out a way to give another default value *). For C-objects it is possible to use any float value as default. [loadbang] | [$1] | [sel 0] | [my default value( Colet Patrice ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Re: [PD] Splitting Objects
De: Patrice Colet colet.patr...@free.fr De: Funs Seelen funssee...@gmail.com Speaking about creation arguments: if none are given for abstractions the default value is always 0 (at least I never figured out a way to give another default value *). For C-objects it is possible to use any float value as default. [loadbang] | [$1] | [sel 0] | [my default value( indeed it doesn't seem possible to set a default value and keep 0 as another value ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
[PD] Splitting Objects
Hello, as I have once again done some on PuREST JSON, I had the idea to split an object into two seperate objects and provide the original object as an abstraction with the library, where the abstraction provides exactly the same semantics and logic of the original object. Is there any pitfall to that approach? One thing I need to take care for are creation arguments. Anything else I need to consider? Thanks, Thomas PS: OAUTH is working now, I have even successfully twittered from Pd :-) -- Prisons are needed only to provide the illusion that courts and police are effective. They're a kind of job insurance. (Leto II. in: Frank Herbert, God Emperor of Dune) http://www.residuum.org/ ___ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
