[PD] libpd netreceive

2013-01-20 Thread Thomas Grill
Hi all,
i am new to libpd and i have run into problems using netreceive on ios 5.1.
While netsend works perfectly, netreceive doesn't work at all. Senders can
connect to the receiving socket, but netreceive wouldn't spit out any data.
Looking at the code, it seems to me that the polling of the net sockets
(done in plain Pure Data in s_inter.c / sys_domicrosleep) is not called in
libpd at all. I also couldn't find a different place where this is done.
Does that mean that libpd doesn't currently service incoming socket data?


Thanks for clarification, all the best,
gr~~~

-- 
Thomas Grill
http://g.org
___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] libpd netreceive

2013-01-20 Thread Peter Brinkmann
Hi Thomas,
I have to admit that I didn't realize that netreceive requires an extra
polling step. So, I'm afraid that netreceive is currently broken.

The question is what to do about this. I took a quick look at
sys_domicrosleep and didn't immediately see how it works. I wouldn't mind
integrating it into libpd somehow, but I want to be sure that there won't
be any weird side effects. This seems slightly off-topic for pd-list. Shall
we talk about this on pd-dev?
Cheers,
 Peter



On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Thomas Grill g...@g.org wrote:

 Hi all,
 i am new to libpd and i have run into problems using netreceive on ios 5.1.
 While netsend works perfectly, netreceive doesn't work at all. Senders can
 connect to the receiving socket, but netreceive wouldn't spit out any data.
 Looking at the code, it seems to me that the polling of the net sockets
 (done in plain Pure Data in s_inter.c / sys_domicrosleep) is not called in
 libpd at all. I also couldn't find a different place where this is done.
 Does that mean that libpd doesn't currently service incoming socket data?


 Thanks for clarification, all the best,
 gr~~~

 --
 Thomas Grill
 http://g.org

 ___
 Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
 UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
 http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] libpd netreceive

2013-01-20 Thread Billy Stiltner
Peter while you are in here,  i'm wondering about using the latest
libpd on linux, would it be better to use the old code or the latest?
is there anything that doesn't work that didn't work  in the  previous
versions?

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list


Re: [PD] libpd netreceive

2013-01-20 Thread Peter Brinkmann
Hi Billy,
Use the latest version. I don't think we've had any regressions.
 Peter



On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 9:52 PM, Billy Stiltner billy.stilt...@gmail.comwrote:

 Peter while you are in here,  i'm wondering about using the latest
 libpd on linux, would it be better to use the old code or the latest?
 is there anything that doesn't work that didn't work  in the  previous
 versions?

___
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management - 
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list