hi, (maybe this is of general interest for pd users?) speaking of lists, I once did a similar thing some years ago, collecting 2682 objects. the list is far away from being complete or up to date... http://www.parasitaere-kapazitaeten.net/files/GENERAL_ALL.csv_.txt marius.
2009/2/20 João Pais <jmmmp...@googlemail.com>: >> Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: >> I definitely agree that we should have libraries organized based on a >> topic. There is nothing stopping anyone from doing this. There is >> tons of code that could be easily taking and stuck into new libraries >> organized around concepts. > > hmm, that matches with what I was proposing (still on a private level) for > the new categories of documentating pd-ext objects. although some people > might not like not having their objects in their personal folder, it would > really make information more easily to come by - fyi, I think in the latest > object list I've made, there are ~1200 externals (objects + abstractions). > > I would go to the extra step and and follow yves' suggestions try to ask > some developpers to change the names of some objects to avoid name clashes - > if that's possible anyway, after all these years of programming. > > I can't contribute with code because I can't code, but I can write mails and > give (sometimes good) ideas. To remind how big the task is, I attach here > the list of pd-ext objects I've done some months ago (as a first step to try > to get an updated documentation for pd-ext). _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list