On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 12:58 +0100, Roman Haefeli wrote:
hi all
as i understand the object [bang~], it should output a 'bang' on each
dsp-cycle. this seems to work with blocksizes = 64, but apparently not
with smaller blocksizes. i made the following patch to measure the time
between the dsp-cycles:
[bang~]
|
[t b b]
| |
[timer]
|
[nbx ]
when i put this into a subpatch and set the blocksize to a value 64
(e.g. 32, 16, 8 etc.) using the [block~] object, it still measures 1.333
(pd runs @ 48kHz currently).
why is this? is [timer] or [bang~] buggy? do i understand something
wrong?
iirc, bang~ registers a timer callback. the problem is that the timer
callbacks are only executed every dac block, which is 64 samples.
so running bang~ in subpatch with less than 64 samples, bang~ sets the
samer timer several times, but it's only executed once ...
i came across the same bug some time ago ... fixing it while keeping the
semantic is rather difficult since pd afaict doesn't provide the
required infrastructure ...
filing a bug report is probably a good idea, however i wouldn't rely on
it to be fixed in a reasonable amount of time ...
tim
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]ICQ: 96771783
http://www.mokabar.tk
Every word is like an unnecessary stain on silence and nothingness
Samuel Beckett
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
PD-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
