Re: [PD] Some patches broken in 0.49test3

[Antoine Rousseau]

>
> he's still able to trigger such errors.
>

see https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/issues/477
and a proposed fix: https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/492


Le lun. 24 sept. 2018 à 11:45, Roman Haefeli  a écrit :

> Hi
>
> 0.49test4 fixed the regression for me. I don't see any 'INVALID COMMAND
> NAME' errors anymore. Claude told me in #dataflow, though, that he's
> still able to trigger such errors.
>
> Thanks,
> Roman
>
> On Sun, 2018-09-23 at 09:40 +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> > Hey Claude
> >
> > It seems you already did the hard work. Sorry for not having checked
> > more carefully. I'm glad attention is already paid to the issue.
> >
> > Roman
> >
> > On Sat, 2018-09-22 at 23:29 +0100, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
> > > Hi Roman,
> > >
> > > On 22/09/18 23:19, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> > > > Hi
> > > >
> > > > Sorry, need to report something probably more serious. Some of my
> > > > patches trigger messages like the following:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > (Tcl) INVALID COMMAND NAME: invalid command name
> > > > ".x558795b0c400.c"
> > > >  while executing
> > > > ".x558795b0c400.c itemconfigure 558795b682c0LABEL -font {{DejaVu
> > > > Sans Mono} -11 bold}"
> > > >  ("uplevel" body line 10)
> > > >  invoked from within
> > > > "uplevel #0 $docmds"
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Side effects are that sometimes the label of [cnv] is not
> > > > updated.
> > > > Or
> > > > the canvas stays blank after dynamically creating stuff and
> > > > objects
> > > > are
> > > > only shown after closing the window and opening it again.
> > >
> > > You might try my (unfortunately too slow for anything other than
> > > debugging) attempt here:
> > > https://github.com/claudeha/pure-data/tree/gui-tcl-robustness
> > >
> > > It may reduce the impact of the error, or perhaps show further
> > > errors...
> > > > I don't have a small patch yet that triggers the problem, but
> > > > will
> > > > try
> > > > to figure one out.
> > >
> > > I reported something possibly-similar here:
> > > https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/issues/488
> > >
> > > toplevel patch contains a
> > > non-GOP abstraction which contains a
> > > GOP abstraction which
> > > sets iemgui properties on loadbang results in
> > > invalid command name tcl error
> > > > BTW.: this is with  0ee284ecfb5215
> > > >
> > >
> > > Claude___
> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] Some patches broken in 0.49test3

[Roman Haefeli]

Hi

0.49test4 fixed the regression for me. I don't see any 'INVALID COMMAND
NAME' errors anymore. Claude told me in #dataflow, though, that he's
still able to trigger such errors.

Thanks,
Roman

On Sun, 2018-09-23 at 09:40 +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> Hey Claude
> 
> It seems you already did the hard work. Sorry for not having checked
> more carefully. I'm glad attention is already paid to the issue.
> 
> Roman
> 
> On Sat, 2018-09-22 at 23:29 +0100, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote:
> > Hi Roman,
> > 
> > On 22/09/18 23:19, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> > > Hi
> > > 
> > > Sorry, need to report something probably more serious. Some of my
> > > patches trigger messages like the following:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > (Tcl) INVALID COMMAND NAME: invalid command name
> > > ".x558795b0c400.c"
> > >  while executing
> > > ".x558795b0c400.c itemconfigure 558795b682c0LABEL -font {{DejaVu
> > > Sans Mono} -11 bold}"
> > >  ("uplevel" body line 10)
> > >  invoked from within
> > > "uplevel #0 $docmds"
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Side effects are that sometimes the label of [cnv] is not
> > > updated.
> > > Or
> > > the canvas stays blank after dynamically creating stuff and
> > > objects
> > > are
> > > only shown after closing the window and opening it again.
> > 
> > You might try my (unfortunately too slow for anything other than 
> > debugging) attempt here:
> > https://github.com/claudeha/pure-data/tree/gui-tcl-robustness
> > 
> > It may reduce the impact of the error, or perhaps show further
> > errors...
> > > I don't have a small patch yet that triggers the problem, but
> > > will
> > > try
> > > to figure one out.
> > 
> > I reported something possibly-similar here:
> > https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/issues/488
> > 
> > toplevel patch contains a
> > non-GOP abstraction which contains a
> > GOP abstraction which
> > sets iemgui properties on loadbang results in
> > invalid command name tcl error
> > > BTW.: this is with  0ee284ecfb5215
> > > 
> > 
> > Claude

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] Some patches broken in 0.49test3

[Claude Heiland-Allen]

Hi Roman,

On 22/09/18 23:19, Roman Haefeli wrote:

Hi

Sorry, need to report something probably more serious. Some of my
patches trigger messages like the following:


(Tcl) INVALID COMMAND NAME: invalid command name ".x558795b0c400.c"
 while executing
".x558795b0c400.c itemconfigure 558795b682c0LABEL -font {{DejaVu Sans Mono} -11 
bold}"
 ("uplevel" body line 10)
 invoked from within
"uplevel #0 $docmds"


Side effects are that sometimes the label of [cnv] is not updated. Or
the canvas stays blank after dynamically creating stuff and objects are
only shown after closing the window and opening it again.
You might try my (unfortunately too slow for anything other than 
debugging) attempt here:

https://github.com/claudeha/pure-data/tree/gui-tcl-robustness

It may reduce the impact of the error, or perhaps show further errors...

I don't have a small patch yet that triggers the problem, but will try
to figure one out.

I reported something possibly-similar here:
https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/issues/488

toplevel patch contains a
non-GOP abstraction which contains a
GOP abstraction which
sets iemgui properties on loadbang results in
invalid command name tcl error

BTW.: this is with  0ee284ecfb5215



Claude
--
https://mathr.co.uk




___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] Some patches broken in 0.49test3

[Antoine Rousseau]

yes, this is issue #488 reported by claude.

Antoine Rousseau
  http://www.metalu.net  __
http://www.metaluachahuter.com/




Le dim. 23 sept. 2018 à 00:19, Roman Haefeli  a écrit :

> Hi
>
> Sorry, need to report something probably more serious. Some of my
> patches trigger messages like the following:
>
>
> (Tcl) INVALID COMMAND NAME: invalid command name ".x558795b0c400.c"
> while executing
> ".x558795b0c400.c itemconfigure 558795b682c0LABEL -font {{DejaVu Sans
> Mono} -11 bold}"
> ("uplevel" body line 10)
> invoked from within
> "uplevel #0 $docmds"
>
>
> Side effects are that sometimes the label of [cnv] is not updated. Or
> the canvas stays blank after dynamically creating stuff and objects are
> only shown after closing the window and opening it again.
>
> I don't have a small patch yet that triggers the problem, but will try
> to figure one out.
>
> BTW.: this is with
> 0ee284ecfb5215___
> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

[PD] Some patches broken in 0.49test3

[Roman Haefeli]

Hi

Sorry, need to report something probably more serious. Some of my
patches trigger messages like the following:


(Tcl) INVALID COMMAND NAME: invalid command name ".x558795b0c400.c"
while executing
".x558795b0c400.c itemconfigure 558795b682c0LABEL -font {{DejaVu Sans Mono} -11 
bold}"
("uplevel" body line 10)
invoked from within
"uplevel #0 $docmds"


Side effects are that sometimes the label of [cnv] is not updated. Or
the canvas stays blank after dynamically creating stuff and objects are
only shown after closing the window and opening it again. 

I don't have a small patch yet that triggers the problem, but will try
to figure one out.

BTW.: this is with  0ee284ecfb5215

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> 
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list