[Pdl-devel] interpol vs interpolate
Seems to me we should fix this inconsistency in usage? - Karl use PDL; $x = sequence(100); $y = $x**2; $x2 = sequence(10)*10; # This works $y2 = interpol $x2, $x, $y; print $y2, "\n"; # This does not work $y2 = interpolate $x2, $x, $y; print $y2, "\n"; # But this does ($y2,$err) = interpolate $x2, $x, $y; print $y2, "\n"; -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ pdl-devel mailing list pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-devel
Re: [Pdl-devel] ready for SciPDL 2.017?
Hi Karl- PDL-2.017 is testing very well (and cleanly with all the warning fixed by Derek!). Do you have an estimate time of a SciPDL-2.017 release? Cheers, Chris On 9/29/2016 18:23, Karl Glazebrook wrote: > Maybe a few days AFTER that! I will be in the middle of classes on Oct 10, > otherwise it is fine. I have set it up to be easy. > > Karl > >> On 29 Sep 2016, at 12:34 AM, Chris Marshall wrote: >> >> Hi Karl- >> >> We're heading for a PDL 2.017 release on 10-Oct-2016. There are many bugs >> fixed and all the warning messages seem to be gone. Will you be ready for a >> new SciPDL release by the 10-11th Oct? >> >> Thanks, >> Chris -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ pdl-devel mailing list pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-devel
Re: [Pdl-devel] ready for SciPDL 2.017?
In about a week. right now I don’t want to risk breaking my install as I am in the middle of using PDL to do critical stuff, which is also keeping me busy.. > On 16 Oct 2016, at 6:17 AM, Chris Marshall wrote: > > Hi Karl- > > PDL-2.017 is testing very well (and cleanly with all the warning fixed by > Derek!). > Do you have an estimate time of a SciPDL-2.017 release? > > Cheers, > Chris > > On 9/29/2016 18:23, Karl Glazebrook wrote: >> Maybe a few days AFTER that! I will be in the middle of classes on Oct 10, >> otherwise it is fine. I have set it up to be easy. >> >> Karl >> >>> On 29 Sep 2016, at 12:34 AM, Chris Marshall wrote: >>> >>> Hi Karl- >>> >>> We're heading for a PDL 2.017 release on 10-Oct-2016. There are many bugs >>> fixed and all the warning messages seem to be gone. Will you be ready for a >>> new SciPDL release by the 10-11th Oct? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Chris > -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ pdl-devel mailing list pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-devel
Re: [Pdl-devel] interpol vs interpolate
interpol() seems to be implemented in terms of interpolate() already. Does seem a bit confusing. Maybe the two routines could be merged into a "smarter" interpolate()... --Chris On 10/15/2016 05:18, Karl Glazebrook wrote: > Seems to me we should fix this inconsistency in usage? > > - Karl > > use PDL; > $x = sequence(100); > $y = $x**2; > $x2 = sequence(10)*10; > > # This works > > $y2 = interpol $x2, $x, $y; > print $y2, "\n"; > > # This does not work > $y2 = interpolate $x2, $x, $y; > print $y2, "\n"; > # But this does > ($y2,$err) = interpolate $x2, $x, $y; > print $y2, "\n"; > -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot ___ pdl-devel mailing list pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pdl-devel
