Re: Cool Photoshop feature

[Alan C]

NCIS has been doing it for years!

Alan C

On 16-Mar-21 11:03 PM, Bill wrote:

On 3/16/2021 1:43 PM, Toine wrote:

Tried that with camera raw on several of my KP images. It's the same
option which is included in Lightroom CC. I don't see any difference:
I can see something has changed but it's more between my ears and not
in my eyes.


You didn't catch that your 24mp image was suddenly 96mp?

bill




Toine
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above 
and follow the directions.



--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions.

--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Rejoined PDML

[mike wilson]

> On 16 March 2021 at 17:44 John  wrote:
> 
> 
> My guess is Pentax would have to have sourced a modified version.
> 
> I don't think Pentax could continue to use a part *KNOWING* it was likely to 
> fail. Nor do I think they would even if they could get away with it.
> 
> The question is how to find out whether a used K-70 has the "good" solenoid 
> before you buy it. I'm pretty sure a new one would be Ok.

Having a good one or a replaced (with good) one would be a selling point.  If 
it's not mentioned, caveat emptor.

> 
> On 3/15/2021 12:37:20, Alistair Lax wrote:
> > Having spent a few hours looking at the Pentax forums it appears that the 
> > original white Japanese solenoid was discontinued and was replaced with a 
> > green 
> > Chinese one which was problematic. As far as I can work out, Pentax is 
> > still 
> > using a green Chinese solenoid. Therefore the key question, which I've so 
> > far 
> > been unable to clarify, is whether the currently used solenoid is a 
> > modified 
> > version.
> > 
> > Alistair
> > 
> > On 15/03/2021 04:25 pm, Bill wrote:
> >> On 3/15/2021 10:20 AM, Alistair Lax wrote:
> >>> The K-30, K-50 and K-70 are all named in the class action lawsuit, but it 
> >>> appears unclear how much, if at all, the K-70 is affected. There's a lot 
> >>> of 
> >>> internet chatter including from people don't even have a K-70, some 
> >>> people 
> >>> who seem to have had the problem, and some quoting a Pentax 
> >>> representative 
> >>> who apparently stated the mechanism in the K-70 was different. It's a 
> >>> confused picture.
> >>>
> >>> Alistair
> >>
> >> Honestly, a good place to get this sort of information is pentaxforums.com.
> >> My understanding is the problem originated from the supplier of the 
> >> solenoid 
> >> either stopping making it or making it unavailable, so a new one was 
> >> sourced 
> >> from another vendor, and that one is problematic.
> >>
> >> bill
> >> --
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cool Photoshop feature

[Bill]

On 3/16/2021 1:43 PM, Toine wrote:

Tried that with camera raw on several of my KP images. It's the same
option which is included in Lightroom CC. I don't see any difference:
I can see something has changed but it's more between my ears and not
in my eyes.


You didn't catch that your 24mp image was suddenly 96mp?

bill




Toine
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cool Photoshop feature

[Toine]

Tried that with camera raw on several of my KP images. It's the same
option which is included in Lightroom CC. I don't see any difference:
I can see something has changed but it's more between my ears and not
in my eyes.

Toine
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Rejoined PDML

[P. J. Alling]

Keith Richards isn't really older than dirt, he only looks it.

On 3/16/2021 1:28 PM, John wrote:
We should start thinking now what kind of world we're going to be 
leaving Keith Richards.


On 3/15/2021 14:15:53, Bill wrote:

On 3/15/2021 12:08 PM, Ken Waller wrote:

The only winners are the lawyers.


I'm sure when the world ends, the lawyers will beat out cockroaches 
as the last surviving species.


bill


-Original Message-

From: Alistair Lax 
Sent: Mar 15, 2021 12:20 PM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Rejoined PDML

The K-30, K-50 and K-70 are all named in the class action lawsuit, but
it appears unclear how much, if at all, the K-70 is affected. 
There's a

lot of internet chatter including from people don't even have a K-70,
some people who seem to have had the problem, and some quoting a 
Pentax

representative who apparently stated the mechanism in the K-70 was
different. It's a confused picture.

Alistair

On 15/03/2021 04:00 pm, Bill wrote:



Op 2021-03-15 om 16:09 schreef Ralf R Radermacher:

Am 15.03.21 um 11:48 schrieb Alistair Lax:
Thanks - another consideration. Having thought about the 
Aperture Block

problem overnight (or more accurately during the night) I decided
that I
didn't want a camera that began with a potential problem - 
especially
one that would probably appear a month after the warranty 
ended. K-70

order cancelled!


Why buy a Pentax at all if they're all so much trouble?

Ralf


Aperture block failure is a big enough problem that there is a class
action lawsuit about it in the USA.

bill
--





--
Any idiot can shoot with a Canon, Nikon, or Sony, it takes a special kind of 
idiot to use a Pentax.
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: PESO: Rose

[Ken Waller]

Nice capture, but it could be a tad sharper.


-Original Message-
>From: David Mann 
>Sent: Mar 15, 2021 10:43 PM
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List 
>Subject: PESO: Rose
>
>I put a long lens on the K5ii this morning to try out the AF.  Of course, no 
>birds bothered to show up so I had to make do.  This is straight from the 
>camera, no adjustments except for cropping a bit off the top.
>
>http://gallery.multi.net.nz/photo/1097/#peso
>
>Pentax K5ii with FA*400mm f/5.6, 1/500 at f/8 handheld, 400 ISO.  I ended up 
>using manual exposure for this one as I just couldn't hold it still enough to 
>lock the exposure.
>
>I've uploaded this one at 950px high (as per PUG guidelines) but I'm not sure 
>about that size as it doesn't fully fit in my browser window (which, 
>admittedly, I could enlarge quite easily).
>
>Cheers,
>Dave
>--
>%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
>to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
>the directions.
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: OT: Covid vaccinations

[Bill]

AZ is having no invitation poke parties all week about a mile from where 
I live. Today was for people in my age group. I think I would have had 
to line up about 6:00am to get in. I just drove past and it looks like 
about 4000 cars in the staging area and traffic backed up a mile on 
either side.

I'll wait for another day.

bill


On 3/16/2021 12:11 PM, John wrote:

Seems like it's coming along ...

I just got an email from the VA in Durham that it's now open for ALL 
enrolled veterans, so it looks like it's now reached the "everybody else 
who hasn't been vaccinated yet" stage.


Which, in turn, suggests that if you haven't gotten yours yet, you 
should soon be able to.


I was in the THIRD cohort for the VA in Durham (70+ & "conditions"), and 
have had both of my shots. It's been a month since the second one.


I've also started to get emails from people in the folk music group I 
used to play with wanting to know when we're going to get back together, 
so I expect a lot of others have been getting their shots.




--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

OT: Covid vaccinations

[John]

Seems like it's coming along ...

I just got an email from the VA in Durham that it's now open for ALL enrolled 
veterans, so it looks like it's now reached the "everybody else who hasn't been 
vaccinated yet" stage.


Which, in turn, suggests that if you haven't gotten yours yet, you should soon 
be able to.


I was in the THIRD cohort for the VA in Durham (70+ & "conditions"), and have 
had both of my shots. It's been a month since the second one.


I've also started to get emails from people in the folk music group I used to 
play with wanting to know when we're going to get back together, so I expect a 
lot of others have been getting their shots.



--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Rejoined PDML

[John]

My guess is Pentax would have to have sourced a modified version.

I don't think Pentax could continue to use a part *KNOWING* it was likely to 
fail. Nor do I think they would even if they could get away with it.


The question is how to find out whether a used K-70 has the "good" solenoid 
before you buy it. I'm pretty sure a new one would be Ok.


On 3/15/2021 12:37:20, Alistair Lax wrote:
Having spent a few hours looking at the Pentax forums it appears that the 
original white Japanese solenoid was discontinued and was replaced with a green 
Chinese one which was problematic. As far as I can work out, Pentax is still 
using a green Chinese solenoid. Therefore the key question, which I've so far 
been unable to clarify, is whether the currently used solenoid is a modified 
version.


Alistair

On 15/03/2021 04:25 pm, Bill wrote:

On 3/15/2021 10:20 AM, Alistair Lax wrote:
The K-30, K-50 and K-70 are all named in the class action lawsuit, but it 
appears unclear how much, if at all, the K-70 is affected. There's a lot of 
internet chatter including from people don't even have a K-70, some people 
who seem to have had the problem, and some quoting a Pentax representative 
who apparently stated the mechanism in the K-70 was different. It's a 
confused picture.


Alistair


Honestly, a good place to get this sort of information is pentaxforums.com.
My understanding is the problem originated from the supplier of the solenoid 
either stopping making it or making it unavailable, so a new one was sourced 
from another vendor, and that one is problematic.


bill
--




--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Rejoined PDML

[John]

We should start thinking now what kind of world we're going to be leaving Keith 
Richards.


On 3/15/2021 14:15:53, Bill wrote:

On 3/15/2021 12:08 PM, Ken Waller wrote:

The only winners are the lawyers.


I'm sure when the world ends, the lawyers will beat out cockroaches as the last 
surviving species.


bill


-Original Message-

From: Alistair Lax 
Sent: Mar 15, 2021 12:20 PM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Rejoined PDML

The K-30, K-50 and K-70 are all named in the class action lawsuit, but
it appears unclear how much, if at all, the K-70 is affected. There's a
lot of internet chatter including from people don't even have a K-70,
some people who seem to have had the problem, and some quoting a Pentax
representative who apparently stated the mechanism in the K-70 was
different. It's a confused picture.

Alistair

On 15/03/2021 04:00 pm, Bill wrote:



Op 2021-03-15 om 16:09 schreef Ralf R Radermacher:

Am 15.03.21 um 11:48 schrieb Alistair Lax:

Thanks - another consideration. Having thought about the Aperture Block
problem overnight (or more accurately during the night) I decided
that I
didn't want a camera that began with a potential problem - especially
one that would probably appear a month after the warranty ended. K-70
order cancelled!


Why buy a Pentax at all if they're all so much trouble?

Ralf


Aperture block failure is a big enough problem that there is a class
action lawsuit about it in the USA.

bill
--




--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Enablement (and PESO)

[Rick Womer]

Alan is correct about my K5. I also have no complaints about the AF.

One thing that I have done with each of my camera purchases (Super Program, 
istD, K10D, K20D, K7, K5, a K50 for my daughter and a K70 for my wife) is 
waiting to order until at least a year after introduction, so that most of the 
bugs have been squashed.

Rick

> On Mar 15, 2021, at 10:28 AM, Bill  wrote:
> 
> On 3/15/2021 8:06 AM, Alan C wrote:
>> My K5 (ex Mark Cassino) is just great & hasn't given any problems. I'm sure 
>> Rick Womer feels the same. No buttons have fallen off & the AF is excellent. 
>> However, I believe there were some dicey K5's sold at the end of the Hoya 
>> era.
> 
> Sure, I hear that a lot from K5 owners who haven't been subjected to the 
> horrors that the K5 was prone to. It seems people just want to be in denial 
> and discount the very real problems that the K5 had.
> Pretty much all the K5s that Hoya made came with built in problems that 
> affected a very high percentage of cameras. Ricoh couldn't fix all of them 
> because there were irreparable design flaws within the camera, hence the K5II 
> and K5IIs. The IIs had no AA filter.
> 
> My K5 didn't have the sensor spots, or the falling off buttons or the dials 
> that inexplicably stopped working, or the mirror overrun, or the (I believe 
> related) mirror lock, but it did have AF that was so unreliable as to render 
> the feature useless. Hoya put out several firmware updates designed to fix 
> the AF issue, none of which did any good. Eventually, they just lost interest 
> in trying to fix the bodge that they had created and decided that ignoring 
> the problems would make them go away.
> 
> The K5 was one of the major reasons I invested heavily into the Fuji X 
> system. I decided that I needed a camera that worked.
> 
> bill
> 
>> Alan C
>> On 15-Mar-21 03:53 PM, Bill wrote:
>>> The K5II is what the K5 should have been, had there been adults in the 
>>> room. It seems to have solved all of the niggly K5 problems that were not 
>>> resolved during production, such as buttons falling off and the AF being as 
>>> reliable as a 10 year old Skoda.
>>> It is a big jump from the K10, enjoy it.
>>> 
>>> bill
>>> 
>>> On 3/15/2021 1:28 AM, David Mann wrote:
 It's been a long time since I bought anything photographic but I recently 
 found a used K5ii at a reasonable price, and it arrived today.  This is a 
 big upgrade from my K10D.
 
 I went outside and took a couple of photos just after my daughter went to 
 bed but the light was getting a bit low.  No problem, I can crank up the 
 ISO :)
 
 This was taken with the FA*200mm f/2.8 at 6400ISO, 1/125 at f/5.0 
 handheld, very much reliant on shake reduction.
 
 http://gallery.multi.net.nz/photo/1096/#peso
 
 I'll check whether it's on the latest firmware soon.  To their credit, 
 Ricoh's website made the manual and firmware very easy to find.
 
 Cheers,
 Dave
 -- 
 %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
 follow the directions.
 
>>> -- 
>>> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>> To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
>>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>>> follow the directions.
>> -- 
>> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
> --
> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Enablement (and PESO)

[Daniel J. Matyola]

Lovely image!

Dan Matyola
*https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery
*



On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 3:29 AM David Mann  wrote:

> It's been a long time since I bought anything photographic but I recently
> found a used K5ii at a reasonable price, and it arrived today.  This is a
> big upgrade from my K10D.
>
> I went outside and took a couple of photos just after my daughter went to
> bed but the light was getting a bit low.  No problem, I can crank up the
> ISO :)
>
> This was taken with the FA*200mm f/2.8 at 6400ISO, 1/125 at f/5.0
> handheld, very much reliant on shake reduction.
>
> http://gallery.multi.net.nz/photo/1096/#peso
>
> I'll check whether it's on the latest firmware soon.  To their credit,
> Ricoh's website made the manual and firmware very easy to find.
>
> Cheers,
> Dave
> --
> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: PESO - Leading and Following

[Daniel J. Matyola]

What a charming image!

Dan Matyola
*https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery
*



On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 8:03 PM Rick Womer  wrote:

> From a walk in the park last evening. What a difference from a couple of
> weeks ago!
>
> https://rickwomer.smugmug.com/2021/March-2021/Second-weekend/i-f2sj599/A
>
> (K-5, DA 17-70)
>
> Comments always appreciated.
>
> Rick
> --
> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: PESO: Rose

[Daniel J. Matyola]

Effective and dramatic rendering!

Dan Matyola
*https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery
*



On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 10:43 PM David Mann  wrote:

> I put a long lens on the K5ii this morning to try out the AF.  Of course,
> no birds bothered to show up so I had to make do.  This is straight from
> the camera, no adjustments except for cropping a bit off the top.
>
> http://gallery.multi.net.nz/photo/1097/#peso
>
> Pentax K5ii with FA*400mm f/5.6, 1/500 at f/8 handheld, 400 ISO.  I ended
> up using manual exposure for this one as I just couldn't hold it still
> enough to lock the exposure.
>
> I've uploaded this one at 950px high (as per PUG guidelines) but I'm not
> sure about that size as it doesn't fully fit in my browser window (which,
> admittedly, I could enlarge quite easily).
>
> Cheers,
> Dave
> --
> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: PESO: Tame Wildlife

[Daniel J. Matyola]

Nice!

I can see the hairs on her chinny, chin, chin.

Dan Matyola
*https://tinyurl.com/DJM-Pentax-Gallery
*



On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 4:20 PM Bill  wrote:

> This was shot a few years ago at one of our national parks.
> This was shot handheld on the K1 with the A* 600/5.6
> F/8, 1/2000 Second at ISO 6400.
> In my excitement, I forgot to change the SR from the A*85mm lens that I
> had been previously using, so it isn't ideal shake reduction.
> I ran the raw file through the enhance setting in ACR wihich doubled the
> file dimensions and allowed me to get a deep enough crop to make the
> deer visible.
>
> https://flic.kr/p/2kLiRt7
>
> Enjoy
>
> bill
> --
> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: PESO: Tame Wildlife

[David J Brooks]

well done Bill

Dave

On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 4:20 PM Bill  wrote:

> This was shot a few years ago at one of our national parks.
> This was shot handheld on the K1 with the A* 600/5.6
> F/8, 1/2000 Second at ISO 6400.
> In my excitement, I forgot to change the SR from the A*85mm lens that I
> had been previously using, so it isn't ideal shake reduction.
> I ran the raw file through the enhance setting in ACR wihich doubled the
> file dimensions and allowed me to get a deep enough crop to make the
> deer visible.
>
> https://flic.kr/p/2kLiRt7
>
> Enjoy
>
> bill
> --
> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>


-- 
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: PESO: Rose

[Alan C]

Nice, Dave. That FA*400 on the K5ii should give wonderful results. I 
tend to use Jack Davis' formula for H/H at 500mm with my Sigma: TAV 
1/2000; f8 & let the camera sort out the ISO. With the Sony sensors on 
the K5's there is very little noise even at ISO 12800. With the quality 
of that F*400 you would probably be quite OK at F5.6.


On 16-Mar-21 04:43 AM, David Mann wrote:

I put a long lens on the K5ii this morning to try out the AF.  Of course, no 
birds bothered to show up so I had to make do.  This is straight from the 
camera, no adjustments except for cropping a bit off the top.

http://gallery.multi.net.nz/photo/1097/#peso

Pentax K5ii with FA*400mm f/5.6, 1/500 at f/8 handheld, 400 ISO.  I ended up 
using manual exposure for this one as I just couldn't hold it still enough to 
lock the exposure.

I've uploaded this one at 950px high (as per PUG guidelines) but I'm not sure 
about that size as it doesn't fully fit in my browser window (which, 
admittedly, I could enlarge quite easily).

Cheers,
Dave
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Cool Photoshop feature

[David Mann]

And I saw this article about it linked from a news site this morning.
https://petapixel.com/2021/03/13/adobe-photoshops-super-resolution-made-my-jaw-hit-the-floor/

Cheers,
Dave

> On Mar 16, 2021, at 10:42 AM, Brian W  wrote:
> 
> A DP Review user did some testing of the feature - seems impressive:
> 
> https://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/64944772
> 
> 
> Cheers
> Brian
> 
> 
>> On 16 March 2021 at 02:29 Bill  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> This was just released a few days ago, so should be on your next update.
>> Camera raw now has a feature called "enhance", which uses artificial 
>> intelligence to increase the resolution of files.
>> I just tried it on a couple of old *istD files, and it seems to work 
>> very well indeed, it turned my 6mp file into a 24mp one with no 
>> upscaling artifacts that I could see.
>> It might be something to consider for people who shoot BIFs.
>> 
>> bill
>> --
>> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
>> the directions.
> --
> %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
--
%(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.