Re: A half-frame Pentax film camera
It's old enough that it does NOT have a catalytic convertor for someone to steal isn't it? On 3/5/2024 2:37 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: Thank you, Larry. Hmm. My Lancia is a 1967 model ... I seem to recall the Alfa Romeo type 105 chassis replaced the Giulia Sprint and its siblings, starting around 1965 or 1966, but I'd have to look them up to be certain. Doesn't matter really ... the Giulia Sprint and Guiletta Spider are lovely cars and a delight to drive. My Fulvia's muffler lost a dime sized hole out of the end of the main muffler last week, and the muffler is cracking all the way around now. But that small additional opening netted a rather pretty exhaust sound. So I've ordered an Abarth system to replace the stock exhaust and give the car a little more aural character ... the stock Fulvia Coupé exhaust is rather quiet, but that little V4 makes such a pretty sound it deserves a more sporting system to highlight it. :) onwards! G On Mar 4, 2024, at 2:41 PM, Larry Colen wrote: On Mar 4, 2024, at 8:06 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: Minox 35... I still have my Minox 35GT-E, which I purchased new in 1998. It is a lovely camera and has made many great photos for me. I've currently got it loaded with some Tri-X and may take it on my two-week excursion to the Right Coast tomorrow. Regards terminology, cameras like this, the Rollei 35, the Voigtländer Perkeo II, etc, are "scale focus" cameras ... they have no rangefinder or TTL viewing system, you focus by setting a distance on the focusing scale. A true "zone focusing camera" is even simpler than this: the focusing scale has no distance markings, just symbols to indicate far, intermediate distances, and close up. We may not always agree on everything, but I do admire and respect your cyclopedic (Polyphemian?) knowledge on so many topics. I did think of you yesterday when I passed a light blue Giullia(?) sprint of similar vintage to yours. As I was driivng unfortunately as I was driving, getting a photo wasn't feasible. -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Vivere in aeternum aut mori conatur -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software. www.avg.com -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: A half-frame Pentax film camera
On 3/4/2024 3:53 AM, Bob W PDML wrote: On 3 Mar 2024, at 17:45, Ralf R Radermacher wrote: Am 03.03.24 um 18:29 schrieb Bill: I was quite surprised that it is a vertical half frame, but the logic behind that decision is that a vertical format is what the target market is already comfortable with. Making it a horizontal half frame would mean transporting the film from top to bottom and a very odd shape of the camera. […] Actually it would be the same shape but in a different orientation. I’m not a mechanical engineer so I might be completely wrong, but if you put the film advance on the new top of the camera it would perhaps need only one more gear to deal with the change of orientation. The rewind crank doesn’t need to be on the new top. Making the camera square would do away with that. In fact using a square negative 24x24 would give you 54 frames per roll. A lot of people now like to see the sprocket holes in the picture, postmodernly drawing attention to it being film, so making the frame mask switchable might be an interesting option. In the video he talks about using zone focusing on the camera. I wonder if he means click-stops on the focus ring, or perhaps on a dial, with symbols for the type of shot, eg headshot, head and shoulders, cowboy, full-length, group/wide shot, landscape etc. That could also be used to determine the exposure settings in conjunction with the orientation of the camera, favouring a larger aperture for closer portraits to increase background blur, and a smaller aperture for wider shots using the hyperfocal distance to give the greatest depth of field. The problem with square format in this case is that it's a bastard sized negative that won't be scan-able or printable in conventional labs. For the format to work it needs to be a 35mm format that has been in use. Even half frame is going to be a problem because of how few labs are equipped for it, but at least half frame masks can be had. bill -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: A half-frame Pentax film camera
> On Mar 4, 2024, at 11:37 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > > Thank you, Larry. > > Hmm. My Lancia is a 1967 model ... I seem to recall the Alfa Romeo type 105 > chassis replaced the Giulia Sprint and its siblings, starting around 1965 or > 1966, but I'd have to look them up to be certain. Doesn't matter really ... > the Giulia Sprint and Guiletta Spider are lovely cars and a delight to drive. I did some poking around, and what I saw looked like it might have been a 1954 sprint coupe, rounded body lines and very small. > > My Fulvia's muffler lost a dime sized hole out of the end of the main muffler > last week, and the muffler is cracking all the way around now. But that small > additional opening netted a rather pretty exhaust sound. So I've ordered an > Abarth system to replace the stock exhaust and give the car a little more > aural character ... the stock Fulvia Coupé exhaust is rather quiet, but that > little V4 makes such a pretty sound it deserves a more sporting system to > highlight it. :) Upon reflection, we're coming up on 40 years since the muffler unwelded itself on my sprite, the day before I was heading to a camping event at Grant Park on Mount Hamilton. (when I moved the exhaust system from the '68 body to the '64 it was cut and re-welded). Driving up Mt. Hamilton, on a beautiful afternoon, top down, with straight pipes will long be one of those cherished memories of everything coming together for a perfect moment in time. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from ret13est -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: A half-frame Pentax film camera
> On 5 Mar 2024, at 01:48, John Sessoms wrote: > I'd play with film more if I had a reliable place to get it processed. I tried several UK labs a couple of years ago when I restarted with film. Most of them were disappointing but I have found two that provide a very good service. One of them is Harman Labs, who also have a lab in the US. You’ll have to Google it as the Pdml rejects it when I include the link. They own and make Ilford film and processing chemicals. The labs use Refrema dip’n’dunk processing with their own Ilford chemicals, and it all seems very well controlled and consistent. My favourite film is Ilford Delta 100 and 400, so it’s a perfect match. Over here they turn the stuff round pretty quickly. It takes about a week from me posting the freepost envelope to getting the scans, then another day or two to receiving the negs. There’s obviously some dependency on the postal service. They always include another mailer when they return the negs. One of the other labs I use gives you the option of returning the negs in archival sleeves; Harman doesn’t offer this so I just resolve and file them when I get them back. Shoot a few rolls and send them in, see what you think. -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: A half-frame Pentax film camera
> On 5 Mar 2024, at 07:38, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > > > […] > > My Fulvia's muffler > […] If that’s not the start of a Frankie Howerd joke then I’m a Vestal Virgin. https://youtu.be/SKphHvvvNSs?si=CZcXsrSOaB9lQmco -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: A half-frame Pentax film camera
Cheaper to peg a playing card to the fender ;-) Cot > On 5 Mar 2024, at 07:37, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > > So I've ordered an Abarth system to replace the stock exhaust and give the > car a little more aural character ... the stock Fulvia Coupé exhaust is > rather quiet, but that little V4 makes such a pretty sound it deserves a more > sporting system to highlight it. :) -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: PESO: flooding in the dunes (and test)
Thanks John, Paul, Steve and Larry for comments. John, my post may have ended up in your spam box as not coming from a outlook or gmail account. On the other hand I am receiving all pdml posts again on this mail address. Henk Op 2024-03-05 om 03:05 schreef John Sessoms: I still haven't seen Henk's original post, but I noticed a distinct lack of PDML the last week or so and then suddenly today a flood (mostly about the new film camera) Those are both great images. I'm not sure which I like more. On 3/4/2024 1:02 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: Beautiful shots, Hank. Love the light! Paul On Mar 4, 2024, at 12:50 PM, Henk Terhell wrote: After some days not receiving posts from pdml on my outlook mail account (though I was able to send mail), I decided to revert to my mail account of the internet provider. As a test here this mail with link to two pictures of today of exmoor ponies in the dunes. Due to heavy rainfall during this winter my daily walk in the dunes, even with boots on, is quite an adventure. https://flic.kr/p/2pBA4jo https://flic.kr/p/2pBu2KM Henk -- -- %(real_name)s Pentax-Discuss Mail List To unsubscribe send an email to pdml-le...@pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
