Re: Carrying a body without any str.. lenses attached
I just use a regular plastic body cap, it's easier to feel ok throwing it back into the bag when I attach a real lens ;) On 17 November 2012 15:21, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote: On Nov 16, 2012, at 6:27 PM, Rob Studdert wrote: I guess they have to illustrate that it can be done, that said I can only carry my #2 body in my pack sans lens, it's a bit of a pain but so is a bigger pack. I tend to carry my #2 body with my DA40 bodycap. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio) Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Carrying a body without any str.. lenses attached
I always carry my second body with just a cap on it. Frequently I pack both bodies in my Pelican case with just caps and pack all the lenses separately. Paul On Nov 16, 2012, at 6:48 PM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote: I am surprised to see that somebody would be putting the only body without the lens attached in the bag as it is shown in the first video at, say 0:50, and then again at about 1:00. http://products.lowepro.com/product/Pro-Messenger-180-AW,2285,20.htm or directly at Vimeo: http://vimeo.com/29802717# While the narrator says that it is the second body, in those cases, it is clearly not the case. (Other footage where it is is intermixed with this though.) So, I was wondering if anybody would be carrying the only camera body in a messenger bag (when, presumably, you want to be able to take it out and use quickly) - separate from any lens. If yes, - what would be the reason why you'd do that? The only possible argument I can see is that it would be quicker to choose the lens (so that you don't need to detach what you have on first). I'd think that it'd be better to have something always attached, - at least you'd be more prepared for ~50% of shots (if you carry two lenses). What do you think? Igor -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Carrying a body without any str.. lenses attached
When I was flying a lot, on the job, I carried my photo equipment in an aluminum Haliburton case that was secure, non deformable and always fit in the overhead. I carried a body, with cap on, a lens or two, flash, rolls of film, close up diopters and file folders related to the work at hand. I still have the case that I haven't used in years - anyone interested in it? -Original Message- From: Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net Subject: Re: Carrying a body without any str.. lenses attached I always carry my second body with just a cap on it. Frequently I pack both bodies in my Pelican case with just caps and pack all the lenses separately. Paul On Nov 16, 2012, at 6:48 PM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote: I am surprised to see that somebody would be putting the only body without the lens attached in the bag as it is shown in the first video at, say 0:50, and then again at about 1:00. http://products.lowepro.com/product/Pro-Messenger-180-AW,2285,20.htm or directly at Vimeo: http://vimeo.com/29802717# While the narrator says that it is the second body, in those cases, it is clearly not the case. (Other footage where it is is intermixed with this though.) So, I was wondering if anybody would be carrying the only camera body in a messenger bag (when, presumably, you want to be able to take it out and use quickly) - separate from any lens. If yes, - what would be the reason why you'd do that? The only possible argument I can see is that it would be quicker to choose the lens (so that you don't need to detach what you have on first). I'd think that it'd be better to have something always attached, - at least you'd be more prepared for ~50% of shots (if you carry two lenses). What do you think? -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Carrying a body without any str.. lenses attached
I am surprised to see that somebody would be putting the only body without the lens attached in the bag as it is shown in the first video at, say 0:50, and then again at about 1:00. http://products.lowepro.com/product/Pro-Messenger-180-AW,2285,20.htm or directly at Vimeo: http://vimeo.com/29802717# While the narrator says that it is the second body, in those cases, it is clearly not the case. (Other footage where it is is intermixed with this though.) So, I was wondering if anybody would be carrying the only camera body in a messenger bag (when, presumably, you want to be able to take it out and use quickly) - separate from any lens. If yes, - what would be the reason why you'd do that? The only possible argument I can see is that it would be quicker to choose the lens (so that you don't need to detach what you have on first). I'd think that it'd be better to have something always attached, - at least you'd be more prepared for ~50% of shots (if you carry two lenses). What do you think? Igor -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Carrying a body without any str.. lenses attached
It's just an ad.Your over thinking things. On 17 November 2012 07:48, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote: I am surprised to see that somebody would be putting the only body without the lens attached in the bag as it is shown in the first video at, say 0:50, and then again at about 1:00. http://products.lowepro.com/product/Pro-Messenger-180-AW,2285,20.htm or directly at Vimeo: http://vimeo.com/29802717# While the narrator says that it is the second body, in those cases, it is clearly not the case. (Other footage where it is is intermixed with this though.) So, I was wondering if anybody would be carrying the only camera body in a messenger bag (when, presumably, you want to be able to take it out and use quickly) - separate from any lens. If yes, - what would be the reason why you'd do that? The only possible argument I can see is that it would be quicker to choose the lens (so that you don't need to detach what you have on first). I'd think that it'd be better to have something always attached, - at least you'd be more prepared for ~50% of shots (if you carry two lenses). What do you think? Igor -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Carrying a body without any str.. lenses attached
I guess they have to illustrate that it can be done, that said I can only carry my #2 body in my pack sans lens, it's a bit of a pain but so is a bigger pack. Cheers, On 17 November 2012 10:48, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote: I am surprised to see that somebody would be putting the only body without the lens attached in the bag as it is shown in the first video at, say 0:50, and then again at about 1:00. http://products.lowepro.com/product/Pro-Messenger-180-AW,2285,20.htm or directly at Vimeo: http://vimeo.com/29802717# While the narrator says that it is the second body, in those cases, it is clearly not the case. (Other footage where it is is intermixed with this though.) So, I was wondering if anybody would be carrying the only camera body in a messenger bag (when, presumably, you want to be able to take it out and use quickly) - separate from any lens. If yes, - what would be the reason why you'd do that? The only possible argument I can see is that it would be quicker to choose the lens (so that you don't need to detach what you have on first). I'd think that it'd be better to have something always attached, - at least you'd be more prepared for ~50% of shots (if you carry two lenses). What do you think? Igor -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio) Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC +10 Hours Gmail, eBay, Skype, Twitter, Facebook, Picasa: distudio -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: Carrying a body without any str.. lenses attached
On Nov 16, 2012, at 6:27 PM, Rob Studdert wrote: I guess they have to illustrate that it can be done, that said I can only carry my #2 body in my pack sans lens, it's a bit of a pain but so is a bigger pack. I tend to carry my #2 body with my DA40 bodycap. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
