Re: Kodak to bring back Ektachrome!

[Bill]

On 1/13/2017 8:44 AM, Gonz wrote:

Well that's more like it.  What brute would take a dremel to his lenses?

me.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Kodak to bring back Ektachrome!

[John]

On 1/13/2017 6:50 AM, Steve Cottrell wrote:

On 12/1/17, John, discombobulated, unleashed:


Would you let Cotty take his Dremel to YOUR lenses?



I would just like to interject, if I may, with a point of information.

I have not, nor am never likely to, taken a Dremel to any of my lenses. True.

I've always used a hacksaw.



Ok, fair enough ...

Bob, would you let Cotty take his *hacksaw* to YOUR lenses?

--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Kodak to bring back Ektachrome!

[P. J. Alling]

Funny, I always thought that Cotty was the torch and pliers type...


On 1/13/2017 9:44 AM, Gonz wrote:

Well that's more like it.  What brute would take a dremel to his lenses?


On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 5:50 AM, Steve Cottrell  wrote:

On 12/1/17, John, discombobulated, unleashed:


Would you let Cotty take his Dremel to YOUR lenses?


I would just like to interject, if I may, with a point of information.

I have not, nor am never likely to, taken a Dremel to any of my lenses. True.

I've always used a hacksaw.

--


Cheers,
   Cotty


___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
||  (O)  |Web Video Production
--
_



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.






--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Kodak to bring back Ektachrome!

[Gonz]

Well that's more like it.  What brute would take a dremel to his lenses?


On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 5:50 AM, Steve Cottrell  wrote:
> On 12/1/17, John, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>Would you let Cotty take his Dremel to YOUR lenses?
>
>
> I would just like to interject, if I may, with a point of information.
>
> I have not, nor am never likely to, taken a Dremel to any of my lenses. True.
>
> I've always used a hacksaw.
>
> --
>
>
> Cheers,
>   Cotty
>
>
> ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
> ||  (O)  |Web Video Production
> --
> _
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.



-- 
-- Reduce your Government Footprint

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Kodak to bring back Ektachrome!

[Steve Cottrell]

On 12/1/17, John, discombobulated, unleashed:

>Would you let Cotty take his Dremel to YOUR lenses?


I would just like to interject, if I may, with a point of information.

I have not, nor am never likely to, taken a Dremel to any of my lenses. True.

I've always used a hacksaw.

-- 


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
||  (O)  |Web Video Production
--
_



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Kodak to bring back Ektachrome!

[Bob W-PDML]

Good point!

https://i.ytimg.com/vi/kXm4p7KfhkU/maxresdefault.jpg

On 12 Jan 2017, at 21:02, John 
> wrote:

Would you let Cotty take his Dremel to YOUR lenses?

On 1/12/2017 2:28 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
Cotty has a Dremel, and he knows how to use it...

On 12 Jan 2017, at 15:52, John 
> wrote:

Pentax is gonna' have to do. None of my lenses would fit the Nikon.

On 1/12/2017 10:31 AM, Gonz wrote:
Now you just need a Nikon camera.


On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:22 AM, John 
> wrote:
Makes you think all the world's a sunny day, Oh Yeah!

On 1/11/2017 4:01 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:

And the Greens of summers...


On 1/11/2017 2:27 PM, John wrote:

There are better B films, and the whole reason for Kodachrome was the
"nice bright colors".

On 1/11/2017 8:40 AM, Collin B wrote:

We've a guy here in town, just around the corner from me in fact (and
also
on apug) who does b processing of Kodachrome. Apparently it's a lot of
work but people are happy with the results.



--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Kodak to bring back Ektachrome!

[John]

Would you let Cotty take his Dremel to YOUR lenses?

On 1/12/2017 2:28 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:

Cotty has a Dremel, and he knows how to use it...


On 12 Jan 2017, at 15:52, John  wrote:

Pentax is gonna' have to do. None of my lenses would fit the Nikon.


On 1/12/2017 10:31 AM, Gonz wrote:
Now you just need a Nikon camera.



On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:22 AM, John  wrote:
Makes you think all the world's a sunny day, Oh Yeah!


On 1/11/2017 4:01 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:

And the Greens of summers...



On 1/11/2017 2:27 PM, John wrote:

There are better B films, and the whole reason for Kodachrome was the
"nice bright colors".


On 1/11/2017 8:40 AM, Collin B wrote:

We've a guy here in town, just around the corner from me in fact (and
also
on apug) who does b processing of Kodachrome. Apparently it's a lot of
work but people are happy with the results.





--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Kodak to bring back Ektachrome!

[Bob W-PDML]

Cotty has a Dremel, and he knows how to use it...

> On 12 Jan 2017, at 15:52, John  wrote:
> 
> Pentax is gonna' have to do. None of my lenses would fit the Nikon.
> 
>> On 1/12/2017 10:31 AM, Gonz wrote:
>> Now you just need a Nikon camera.
>> 
>> 
>>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:22 AM, John  wrote:
>>> Makes you think all the world's a sunny day, Oh Yeah!
>>> 
 On 1/11/2017 4:01 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
 
 And the Greens of summers...
 
 
> On 1/11/2017 2:27 PM, John wrote:
> 
> There are better B films, and the whole reason for Kodachrome was the
> "nice bright colors".
> 
>> On 1/11/2017 8:40 AM, Collin B wrote:
>> 
>> We've a guy here in town, just around the corner from me in fact (and
>> also
>> on apug) who does b processing of Kodachrome. Apparently it's a lot of
>> work but people are happy with the results.
>> 

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Kodak to bring back Ektachrome!

[John]

Pentax is gonna' have to do. None of my lenses would fit the Nikon.

On 1/12/2017 10:31 AM, Gonz wrote:

Now you just need a Nikon camera.


On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:22 AM, John  wrote:

Makes you think all the world's a sunny day, Oh Yeah!

On 1/11/2017 4:01 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:


And the Greens of summers...


On 1/11/2017 2:27 PM, John wrote:


There are better B films, and the whole reason for Kodachrome was the
"nice bright colors".

On 1/11/2017 8:40 AM, Collin B wrote:


We've a guy here in town, just around the corner from me in fact (and
also
on apug) who does b processing of Kodachrome. Apparently it's a lot of
work but people are happy with the results.






I needed that.




--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Kodak to bring back Ektachrome!

[Gonz]

Now you just need a Nikon camera.


On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 9:22 AM, John  wrote:
> Makes you think all the world's a sunny day, Oh Yeah!
>
> On 1/11/2017 4:01 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
>>
>> And the Greens of summers...
>>
>>
>> On 1/11/2017 2:27 PM, John wrote:
>>>
>>> There are better B films, and the whole reason for Kodachrome was the
>>> "nice bright colors".
>>>
>>> On 1/11/2017 8:40 AM, Collin B wrote:

 We've a guy here in town, just around the corner from me in fact (and
 also
 on apug) who does b processing of Kodachrome. Apparently it's a lot of
 work but people are happy with the results.


>>>
>
> I needed that.
>
> --
> Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
> Religion - Answers we must never question.
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.



-- 
-- Reduce your Government Footprint

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Kodak to bring back Ektachrome!

[John]

Makes you think all the world's a sunny day, Oh Yeah!

On 1/11/2017 4:01 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:

And the Greens of summers...


On 1/11/2017 2:27 PM, John wrote:

There are better B films, and the whole reason for Kodachrome was the
"nice bright colors".

On 1/11/2017 8:40 AM, Collin B wrote:

We've a guy here in town, just around the corner from me in fact (and
also
on apug) who does b processing of Kodachrome. Apparently it's a lot of
work but people are happy with the results.






I needed that.

--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Kodak to bring back Ektachrome!

[P. J. Alling]

And the Greens of summers...


On 1/11/2017 2:27 PM, John wrote:

There are better B films, and the whole reason for Kodachrome was the
"nice bright colors".

On 1/11/2017 8:40 AM, Collin B wrote:
We've a guy here in town, just around the corner from me in fact (and 
also

on apug) who does b processing of Kodachrome. Apparently it's a lot of
work but people are happy with the results.







--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Kodak to bring back Ektachrome!

[John]

There are better B films, and the whole reason for Kodachrome was the
"nice bright colors".

On 1/11/2017 8:40 AM, Collin B wrote:

We've a guy here in town, just around the corner from me in fact (and also
on apug) who does b processing of Kodachrome. Apparently it's a lot of
work but people are happy with the results.




--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Kodak to bring back Ektachrome!

[Collin B]

We've a guy here in town, just around the corner from me in fact (and also
on apug) who does b processing of Kodachrome. Apparently it's a lot of
work but people are happy with the results.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Kodak to bring back Ektachrome!

[John]

If you do, let us know where.

I still have several Kodachrome 64 cartridges for my Pentax Auto 110
lurking in the back of my freezer. It would be nice to be able to use
them & free up some room back there.

Kodak used to have a technical data sheet for the K-14 process on their
web site, but it's a dead link now.


On 1/10/2017 10:15 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:

Well if they bring it back maybe I can get that cartridge of 110
Kodachrome I found a while ago processed...


On 1/9/2017 1:53 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:

http://petapixel.com/2017/01/09/kodak-investigating-take-bring-back-kodachrome/


Now they are thinking about kodachrome. I will believe it when I see
it really.

On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Bob W-PDML <p...@web-options.com> wrote:

It must be Ektaplasm


On 9 Jan 2017, at 17:39, P. J. Alling <webstertwenty...@gmail.com>
wrote:

Well, it isn't really "Kodak", maybe it isn't really Ektachrome.



On 1/9/2017 10:18 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
>From the Washington Post!  FYI!


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2017/01/06/kodak-says-its-bringing-back-ektachrome-film-and-photographers-everywhere-smile/?hpid=hp_hp-cards_hp-card-technology%3Ahomepage%2Fcard_term=.c6c5ac75995d



Cheers, Christine



--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Kodak to bring back Ektachrome!

[P. J. Alling]

Well if they bring it back maybe I can get that cartridge of 110 
Kodachrome I found a while ago processed...



On 1/9/2017 1:53 PM, Zos Xavius wrote:

http://petapixel.com/2017/01/09/kodak-investigating-take-bring-back-kodachrome/

Now they are thinking about kodachrome. I will believe it when I see it really.

On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Bob W-PDML <p...@web-options.com> wrote:

It must be Ektaplasm


On 9 Jan 2017, at 17:39, P. J. Alling <webstertwenty...@gmail.com> wrote:

Well, it isn't really "Kodak", maybe it isn't really Ektachrome.



On 1/9/2017 10:18 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
>From the Washington Post!  FYI!


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2017/01/06/kodak-says-its-bringing-back-ektachrome-film-and-photographers-everywhere-smile/?hpid=hp_hp-cards_hp-card-technology%3Ahomepage%2Fcard_term=.c6c5ac75995d


Cheers, Christine


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Kodak to bring back Ektachrome!

[P. J. Alling]

There you do with logic and reason.   You know Kodak* owns the trademark 
on Kodachrome.  I wouldn't put it past them to formulate an E6 reversal 
film to look kinda like Kodachrome and sell that instead...


*The successor company.


On 1/9/2017 3:40 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:

Zos Xavius wrote:


http://petapixel.com/2017/01/09/kodak-investigating-take-bring-back-kodachrome/

Now they are thinking about kodachrome. I will believe it when I see it really.

They're just stoking the social media rumor machine.
They have no intention of bringing back Kodachrome.
  



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Kodak to bring back Ektachrome!

[John]

On 1/9/2017 10:41 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:

Christine Aguila wrote:


From the Washington Post!  FYI!

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2017/01/06/kodak-says-its-bringing-back-ektachrome-film-and-photographers-everywhere-smile/?hpid=hp_hp-cards_hp-card-technology%3Ahomepage%2Fcard_term=.c6c5ac75995d


Only in 35mm format :(




If they manage to sell a shit pot load of it, maybe other formats will
follow.

--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Kodak to bring back Ektachrome!

[John]

I dunno', considering how low the temperatures have been around here the
last few days.

On 1/9/2017 10:52 AM, Zos Xavius wrote:

You will be waiting a long time

On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Collin B  wrote:

There's lots of E-6 out there to shoot.
I'm waiting for Kodachrome's return.
Then ...





--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Kodak to bring back Ektachrome!

[Mark Roberts]

Zos Xavius wrote:

>http://petapixel.com/2017/01/09/kodak-investigating-take-bring-back-kodachrome/
>
>Now they are thinking about kodachrome. I will believe it when I see it really.

They're just stoking the social media rumor machine.
They have no intention of bringing back Kodachrome.
 
-- 
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Kodak to bring back Ektachrome!

[Steve Sharpe]

I'm waiting for Plus-X...

On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 10:47:21 -0500, Collin B wrote:
> There's lots of E-6 out there to shoot.
> I'm waiting for Kodachrome's return.
> Then ...

---

Steven Sharpe - The Office Gallery

d...@eastlink.ca

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Kodak to bring back Ektachrome!

[Zos Xavius]

http://petapixel.com/2017/01/09/kodak-investigating-take-bring-back-kodachrome/

Now they are thinking about kodachrome. I will believe it when I see it really.

On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Bob W-PDML <p...@web-options.com> wrote:
> It must be Ektaplasm
>
>> On 9 Jan 2017, at 17:39, P. J. Alling <webstertwenty...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Well, it isn't really "Kodak", maybe it isn't really Ektachrome.
>>
>>
>>> On 1/9/2017 10:18 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
>>> >From the Washington Post!  FYI!
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2017/01/06/kodak-says-its-bringing-back-ektachrome-film-and-photographers-everywhere-smile/?hpid=hp_hp-cards_hp-card-technology%3Ahomepage%2Fcard_term=.c6c5ac75995d
>>>
>>>
>>> Cheers, Christine
>>
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Kodak to bring back Ektachrome!

[Bob W-PDML]

It must be Ektaplasm

> On 9 Jan 2017, at 17:39, P. J. Alling <webstertwenty...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Well, it isn't really "Kodak", maybe it isn't really Ektachrome.
> 
> 
>> On 1/9/2017 10:18 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:
>> >From the Washington Post!  FYI!
>> 
>> 
>> https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2017/01/06/kodak-says-its-bringing-back-ektachrome-film-and-photographers-everywhere-smile/?hpid=hp_hp-cards_hp-card-technology%3Ahomepage%2Fcard_term=.c6c5ac75995d
>> 
>> 
>> Cheers, Christine
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Kodak to bring back Ektachrome!

[P. J. Alling]

Well, it isn't really "Kodak", maybe it isn't really Ektachrome.


On 1/9/2017 10:18 AM, Christine Aguila wrote:

>From the Washington Post!  FYI!


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2017/01/06/kodak-says-its-bringing-back-ektachrome-film-and-photographers-everywhere-smile/?hpid=hp_hp-cards_hp-card-technology%3Ahomepage%2Fcard_term=.c6c5ac75995d


Cheers, Christine



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Kodak to bring back Ektachrome!

[Steve Cottrell]

On 9/1/17, Collin B, discombobulated, unleashed:

>I'm waiting for Kodachrome's return.

K25 - f/8 and chill for a while

-- 


Cheers,
  Cotty


___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
||  (O)  |Web Video Production
--
_



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Kodak to bring back Ektachrome!

[Zos Xavius]

You will be waiting a long time

On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Collin B  wrote:
> There's lots of E-6 out there to shoot.
> I'm waiting for Kodachrome's return.
> Then ...
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Kodak to bring back Ektachrome!

[Collin B]

There's lots of E-6 out there to shoot.
I'm waiting for Kodachrome's return.
Then ...


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Kodak to bring back Ektachrome!

[Mark Roberts]

Christine Aguila wrote:

>From the Washington Post!  FYI!
>
>https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2017/01/06/kodak-says-its-bringing-back-ektachrome-film-and-photographers-everywhere-smile/?hpid=hp_hp-cards_hp-card-technology%3Ahomepage%2Fcard_term=.c6c5ac75995d

Only in 35mm format :(
 
-- 
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Kodak to bring back Ektachrome!

[Christine Aguila]

>From the Washington Post!  FYI!


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-switch/wp/2017/01/06/kodak-says-its-bringing-back-ektachrome-film-and-photographers-everywhere-smile/?hpid=hp_hp-cards_hp-card-technology%3Ahomepage%2Fcard_term=.c6c5ac75995d


Cheers, Christine
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Ektachrome, 1978

[Paul Stenquist]

Here's a 1978 Ektachorme that has largely resisted fading although it was 
stored in the dark. I should add that some of the Ektachromes that I shot with 
my Brownie Starflash in the fifties have faded a lot. This shot was taken for J 
Walter Thompson, and it was probably my first paid photo assignment that wasn't 
part of a journalism job. I used my Vivitar 20mm 3.5, which wasn't very sharp, 
but I probably had it stopped way down in back. That's my undergrad alma mater, 
Roosevelt University in the background. Brooksie spent some time there as well. 
It's in Adler and Sullivan's late 19th century Auditorium Hotel building. The 
building next door -- I think it's called the Fine Arts Building -- is even 
older. Back then it housed the Studebaker Theater and a coffee shop on the 
lower level frequented by students and the artsy set. The race car is a jet 
powered dragster with some nice body work by an aluminum craftsman named Lee 
Austin.

I suspect Ektachromes formula changed over the years. I think all of mine from 
the seventies are in good shape. (I know the processing chemicals changed in 
the mid seventies from E4 to E6.) Gamma Labs on the west end of downtown 
Chicago processed all of mine.

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16963163size=lg
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Ektachrome, 1978

[Zos Xavius]

Cool shot. I want a jet powered dragster!

On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 7:47 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
 Here's a 1978 Ektachorme that has largely resisted fading although it was 
 stored in the dark. I should add that some of the Ektachromes that I shot 
 with my Brownie Starflash in the fifties have faded a lot. This shot was 
 taken for J Walter Thompson, and it was probably my first paid photo 
 assignment that wasn't part of a journalism job. I used my Vivitar 20mm 3.5, 
 which wasn't very sharp, but I probably had it stopped way down in back. 
 That's my undergrad alma mater, Roosevelt University in the background. 
 Brooksie spent some time there as well. It's in Adler and Sullivan's late 
 19th century Auditorium Hotel building. The building next door -- I think 
 it's called the Fine Arts Building -- is even older. Back then it housed the 
 Studebaker Theater and a coffee shop on the lower level frequented by 
 students and the artsy set. The race car is a jet powered dragster with some 
 nice body work by an aluminum craftsman named Lee Austin.

 I suspect Ektachromes formula changed over the years. I think all of mine 
 from the seventies are in good shape. (I know the processing chemicals 
 changed in the mid seventies from E4 to E6.) Gamma Labs on the west end of 
 downtown Chicago processed all of mine.

 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16963163size=lg
 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Ektachrome, 1978

[Bob Sullivan]

Cool photo Paul, and I recognize the site!
Regards,  Bob S.

On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 6:47 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
 Here's a 1978 Ektachorme that has largely resisted fading although it was 
 stored in the dark. I should add that some of the Ektachromes that I shot 
 with my Brownie Starflash in the fifties have faded a lot. This shot was 
 taken for J Walter Thompson, and it was probably my first paid photo 
 assignment that wasn't part of a journalism job. I used my Vivitar 20mm 3.5, 
 which wasn't very sharp, but I probably had it stopped way down in back. 
 That's my undergrad alma mater, Roosevelt University in the background. 
 Brooksie spent some time there as well. It's in Adler and Sullivan's late 
 19th century Auditorium Hotel building. The building next door -- I think 
 it's called the Fine Arts Building -- is even older. Back then it housed the 
 Studebaker Theater and a coffee shop on the lower level frequented by 
 students and the artsy set. The race car is a jet powered dragster with some 
 nice body work by an aluminum craftsman named Lee Austin.

 I suspect Ektachromes formula changed over the years. I think all of mine 
 from the seventies are in good shape. (I know the processing chemicals 
 changed in the mid seventies from E4 to E6.) Gamma Labs on the west end of 
 downtown Chicago processed all of mine.

 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16963163size=lg
 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Ektachrome, 1978

[Kenneth Waller]

Way nice,creative capture, love the way the background is rendered!


-Original Message-
From: Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net

Subject: Ektachrome, 1978

Here's a 1978 Ektachorme that has largely resisted fading although it was 
stored in the dark. I should add that some of the Ektachromes that I shot with 
my Brownie Starflash in the fifties have faded a lot. This shot was taken for 
J Walter Thompson, and it was probably my first paid photo assignment that 
wasn't part of a journalism job. I used my Vivitar 20mm 3.5, which wasn't very 
sharp, but I probably had it stopped way down in back. That's my undergrad 
alma mater, Roosevelt University in the background. Brooksie spent some time 
there as well. It's in Adler and Sullivan's late 19th century Auditorium Hotel 
building. The building next door -- I think it's called the Fine Arts Building 
-- is even older. Back then it housed the Studebaker Theater and a coffee shop 
on the lower level frequented by students and the artsy set. The race car is a 
jet powered dragster with some nice body work by an aluminum craftsman named 
Lee Austin.

I suspect Ektachromes formula changed over the years. I think all of mine from 
the seventies are in good shape. (I know the processing chemicals changed in 
the mid seventies from E4 to E6.) Gamma Labs on the west end of downtown 
Chicago processed all of mine.

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16963163size=lg
-- 



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Ektachrome, 1978

[Kenneth Waller]

Meant to ask what class did it run in?


-Original Message-
From: Kenneth Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com
Subject: Re: Ektachrome, 1978

Way nice,creative capture, love the way the background is rendered!


-Original Message-
From: Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net

Subject: Ektachrome, 1978

Here's a 1978 Ektachorme that has largely resisted fading although it was 
stored in the dark. I should add that some of the Ektachromes that I shot 
with my Brownie Starflash in the fifties have faded a lot. This shot was 
taken for J Walter Thompson, and it was probably my first paid photo 
assignment that wasn't part of a journalism job. I used my Vivitar 20mm 3.5, 
which wasn't very sharp, but I probably had it stopped way down in back. 
That's my undergrad alma mater, Roosevelt University in the background. 
Brooksie spent some time there as well. It's in Adler and Sullivan's late 
19th century Auditorium Hotel building. The building next door -- I think 
it's called the Fine Arts Building -- is even older. Back then it housed the 
Studebaker Theater and a coffee shop on the lower level frequented by 
students and the artsy set. The race car is a jet powered dragster with some 
nice body work by an aluminum craftsman named Lee Austin.

I suspect Ektachromes formula changed over the years. I think all of mine 
from the seventies are in good shape. (I know the processing chemicals 
changed in the mid seventies from E4 to E6.) Gamma Labs on the west end of 
downtown Chicago processed all of mine.

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16963163size=lg


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Ektachrome, 1978

[Paul Stenquist]

It was strictly an exhibition car, and there wasn't really a class for it.  
Back then -- and perhaps still today -- there were rocket and jet powered 
dragsters that only ran exhibitions. Most of the jets turned low seven second 
elapsed times at about 270 mph. Some of the rockets turned 5 second elapsed 
times at over 300 mph. This one was powered by a general electric jet engine I 
believe, probably government surplus.

On Feb 24, 2013, at 1:27 PM, Kenneth Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:

 Meant to ask what class did it run in?
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Kenneth Waller kwal...@peoplepc.com
 Subject: Re: Ektachrome, 1978
 
 Way nice,creative capture, love the way the background is rendered!
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net
 
 Subject: Ektachrome, 1978
 
 Here's a 1978 Ektachorme that has largely resisted fading although it was 
 stored in the dark. I should add that some of the Ektachromes that I shot 
 with my Brownie Starflash in the fifties have faded a lot. This shot was 
 taken for J Walter Thompson, and it was probably my first paid photo 
 assignment that wasn't part of a journalism job. I used my Vivitar 20mm 
 3.5, which wasn't very sharp, but I probably had it stopped way down in 
 back. That's my undergrad alma mater, Roosevelt University in the 
 background. Brooksie spent some time there as well. It's in Adler and 
 Sullivan's late 19th century Auditorium Hotel building. The building next 
 door -- I think it's called the Fine Arts Building -- is even older. Back 
 then it housed the Studebaker Theater and a coffee shop on the lower level 
 frequented by students and the artsy set. The race car is a jet powered 
 dragster with some nice body work by an aluminum craftsman named Lee Austin.
 
 I suspect Ektachromes formula changed over the years. I think all of mine 
 from the seventies are in good shape. (I know the processing chemicals 
 changed in the mid seventies from E4 to E6.) Gamma Labs on the west end of 
 downtown Chicago processed all of mine.
 
 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16963163size=lg
 
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Ektachrome, 1978

[Bruce Walker]

Jet powered dragster: too cool. An adolescent's wet dream. :-) Love
the shot, Paul.

On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 7:47 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
 Here's a 1978 Ektachorme that has largely resisted fading although it was 
 stored in the dark. I should add that some of the Ektachromes that I shot 
 with my Brownie Starflash in the fifties have faded a lot. This shot was 
 taken for J Walter Thompson, and it was probably my first paid photo 
 assignment that wasn't part of a journalism job. I used my Vivitar 20mm 3.5, 
 which wasn't very sharp, but I probably had it stopped way down in back. 
 That's my undergrad alma mater, Roosevelt University in the background. 
 Brooksie spent some time there as well. It's in Adler and Sullivan's late 
 19th century Auditorium Hotel building. The building next door -- I think 
 it's called the Fine Arts Building -- is even older. Back then it housed the 
 Studebaker Theater and a coffee shop on the lower level frequented by 
 students and the artsy set. The race car is a jet powered dragster with some 
 nice body work by an aluminum craftsman named Lee Austin.

 I suspect Ektachromes formula changed over the years. I think all of mine 
 from the seventies are in good shape. (I know the processing chemicals 
 changed in the mid seventies from E4 to E6.) Gamma Labs on the west end of 
 downtown Chicago processed all of mine.

 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16963163size=lg
 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.



--
-bmw

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

RE: Ektachrome, 1978

[Bob W]

 From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Bruce Walker
 
 Jet powered dragster: too cool. An adolescent's wet dream. :-) Love the
 shot, Paul.
 

Wrestling naked in warm mud with Raquel Welch and Ursula Andress are an
adolescent's wet dream, mate. Jet-propelled dragsters are just sublimation. 


 
  http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16963163size=lg



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Ektachrome, 1978

[Mark C]

Great shot of an exceptional vehicle and also of  Michigan Avenue. I did 
a 6 month certificate program an Roosevelt in 1984 - the buildings are 
just as I remember them...


Mark

On 2/24/2013 7:47 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:

Here's a 1978 Ektachorme that has largely resisted fading although it was 
stored in the dark. I should add that some of the Ektachromes that I shot with 
my Brownie Starflash in the fifties have faded a lot. This shot was taken for J 
Walter Thompson, and it was probably my first paid photo assignment that wasn't 
part of a journalism job. I used my Vivitar 20mm 3.5, which wasn't very sharp, 
but I probably had it stopped way down in back. That's my undergrad alma mater, 
Roosevelt University in the background. Brooksie spent some time there as well. 
It's in Adler and Sullivan's late 19th century Auditorium Hotel building. The 
building next door -- I think it's called the Fine Arts Building -- is even 
older. Back then it housed the Studebaker Theater and a coffee shop on the 
lower level frequented by students and the artsy set. The race car is a jet 
powered dragster with some nice body work by an aluminum craftsman named Lee 
Austin.

I suspect Ektachromes formula changed over the years. I think all of mine from 
the seventies are in good shape. (I know the processing chemicals changed in 
the mid seventies from E4 to E6.) Gamma Labs on the west end of downtown 
Chicago processed all of mine.

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16963163size=lg




--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Ektachrome, 1978

[Paul Stenquist]

Thanks Mark. I enjoyed Roosevelt. It was a good environment with small classes 
and a lot of personal attention. It was transformational for me. Still remember 
studying in Grant Park and sneaking up onto the roof of the auditorium building 
to take in some summer sun. I entered as a second semester sophomore transfer 
student in 1969 and graduated in 1971. Good times.
On Feb 24, 2013, at 8:14 PM, Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net wrote:

 Great shot of an exceptional vehicle and also of  Michigan Avenue. I did a 6 
 month certificate program an Roosevelt in 1984 - the buildings are just as I 
 remember them...
 
 Mark
 
 On 2/24/2013 7:47 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
 Here's a 1978 Ektachorme that has largely resisted fading although it was 
 stored in the dark. I should add that some of the Ektachromes that I shot 
 with my Brownie Starflash in the fifties have faded a lot. This shot was 
 taken for J Walter Thompson, and it was probably my first paid photo 
 assignment that wasn't part of a journalism job. I used my Vivitar 20mm 3.5, 
 which wasn't very sharp, but I probably had it stopped way down in back. 
 That's my undergrad alma mater, Roosevelt University in the background. 
 Brooksie spent some time there as well. It's in Adler and Sullivan's late 
 19th century Auditorium Hotel building. The building next door -- I think 
 it's called the Fine Arts Building -- is even older. Back then it housed the 
 Studebaker Theater and a coffee shop on the lower level frequented by 
 students and the artsy set. The race car is a jet powered dragster with some 
 nice body work by an aluminum craftsman named Lee Austin.
 
 I suspect Ektachromes formula changed over the years. I think all of mine 
 from the seventies are in good shape. (I know the processing chemicals 
 changed in the mid seventies from E4 to E6.) Gamma Labs on the west end of 
 downtown Chicago processed all of mine.
 
 http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16963163size=lg
 
 
 
 -- 
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Ektachrome, 1978

[Bruce Walker]

On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 7:52 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
 From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Bruce Walker

 Jet powered dragster: too cool. An adolescent's wet dream. :-) Love the
 shot, Paul.

 Wrestling naked in warm mud with Raquel Welch and Ursula Andress are an
 adolescent's wet dream, mate. Jet-propelled dragsters are just sublimation.

You lost me after Wrestling naked in warm mud with Raquel Welch and
Ursula Andress.


--
-bmw

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Ektachrome!

[Tim Bray]

I found a roll while poking around a usually-neglected shelf.  Should
get the urge, can it still be developed?  My wife wants to save it as
a curio, so an argument will occur.  -T

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Ektachrome!

[David Parsons]

It's an E-6 film, so any lab that can develop slides can handle it,
unless you want to cross-process via C-41.

On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
 I found a roll while poking around a usually-neglected shelf.  Should
 get the urge, can it still be developed?  My wife wants to save it as
 a curio, so an argument will occur.  -T

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.




-- 
David Parsons Photography
http://www.davidparsonsphoto.com

Aloha Photographer Photoblog
http://alohaphotog.blogspot.com/

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Ektachrome!

[Adam Maas]

Not only can it still be developed but Kodak still sells Ektachrome,
albeit a more limited selection these days.

-Adam

On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 12:24 PM, Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
 I found a roll while poking around a usually-neglected shelf.  Should
 get the urge, can it still be developed?  My wife wants to save it as
 a curio, so an argument will occur.  -T

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.




-- 
M. Adam Maas
http://www.mawz.ca
Explorations of the City Around Us.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

RE: Ektachrome!

[John Sessoms]

From: Tim Bray


I found a roll while poking around a usually-neglected shelf.  Should
get the urge, can it still be developed?  My wife wants to save it as
a curio, so an argument will occur.  -T


Yes it can still be developed. Whether the images are worth making your 
wife mad is a question only you can answer.


Exposed roll or un-exposed roll?

If it's un-exposed, best let her keep her curio and you pick up a new 
roll next time you're in a real camera shop if you've got the urge to 
shoot film.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Ektachrome!

[Bob Sullivan]

Tim,
How about if I send you a roll of Kodachrome, just for her.
Regards,  Bob S.

On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
 I found a roll while poking around a usually-neglected shelf.  Should
 get the urge, can it still be developed?  My wife wants to save it as
 a curio, so an argument will occur.  -T

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Kodak discontinues HIE and a bunch of Ektachrome

[Scott Loveless]

Dated November 2. 
http://www.kodak.com/global/en/professional/products/films/discontinuedNotice.jhtml?id=0.2.26.14.25lc=en

http://tinyurl.com/22aq9o

I don't use the slide films they're discontinuing, but the HIE kinda hurts.

-- 
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Kodak discontinues HIE and a bunch of Ektachrome

[P. J. Alling]

Well, that sucks, but it's not unexpected.  Kodak is run by the best 
available MBAs after all.

Scott Loveless wrote:
 Dated November 2. 
 http://www.kodak.com/global/en/professional/products/films/discontinuedNotice.jhtml?id=0.2.26.14.25lc=en

 http://tinyurl.com/22aq9o

 I don't use the slide films they're discontinuing, but the HIE kinda hurts.

   


-- 
The difference between individual intelligence and group intelligence is the 
difference between Harvard University and the Harvard University football team.

-- P. J. O'Roark


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Kodak discontinues HIE and a bunch of Ektachrome

[graywolf]

 From that it looks like it is being replaced, not discontinued. Of course, I 
am 
aware that that is only a distinction if you love one of those films.


Scott Loveless wrote:
 Dated November 2. 
 http://www.kodak.com/global/en/professional/products/films/discontinuedNotice.jhtml?id=0.2.26.14.25lc=en
 
 http://tinyurl.com/22aq9o
 
 I don't use the slide films they're discontinuing, but the HIE kinda hurts.
 

-- 
Graywolf
Website: http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Blog:http://www.graywolfphoto.com/journal/

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Kodak discontinues HIE and a bunch of Ektachrome

[Adam Maas]

No, they're being discontinued. The 'Replacements' are all current films that 
have been on the market for several years. That said, Kodak was a little 
oversupplied with ~ISO100 slide films (IIRC there are 3 remaining in 120 and 4 
in 35mm).

-Adam


graywolf wrote:
  From that it looks like it is being replaced, not discontinued. Of course, I 
 am 
 aware that that is only a distinction if you love one of those films.
 
 
 Scott Loveless wrote:
 Dated November 2. 
 http://www.kodak.com/global/en/professional/products/films/discontinuedNotice.jhtml?id=0.2.26.14.25lc=en

 http://tinyurl.com/22aq9o

 I don't use the slide films they're discontinuing, but the HIE kinda hurts.

 



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Kodak discontinues HIE and a bunch of Ektachrome

[Ed Matthew]

So it is the damned MBA's who want to make the corporation profitable?
I thought it was because digital capture is rapidly replacing
transparency film. Thanks for clearing that up for me.

I switched to Fuji slide film years ago, but I will miss HIE.

BTW, P.J. spells his last name O'Rourke - thought you would like to know :-)

Ed.



On Nov 9, 2007 12:14 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Well, that sucks, but it's not unexpected.  Kodak is run by the best
 available MBAs after all.

 Scott Loveless wrote:
  Dated November 2.
  http://www.kodak.com/global/en/professional/products/films/discontinuedNotice.jhtml?id=0.2.26.14.25lc=en
 
  http://tinyurl.com/22aq9o
 
  I don't use the slide films they're discontinuing, but the HIE kinda hurts.
 
 


 --
 The difference between individual intelligence and group intelligence is the 
 difference between Harvard University and the Harvard University football 
 team.

 -- P. J. O'Roark



 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
 the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Kodak discontinues HIE and a bunch of Ektachrome

[Adam Maas]

Kodak has been losing most of its money pursuing the no-profit and highly 
competitive PS digital market rather than supporting their cash cow (Film, 
which is solid, if diminished) and the actually profitable DSLR market.

_Adam


Ed Matthew wrote:
 So it is the damned MBA's who want to make the corporation profitable?
 I thought it was because digital capture is rapidly replacing
 transparency film. Thanks for clearing that up for me.
 
 I switched to Fuji slide film years ago, but I will miss HIE.
 
 BTW, P.J. spells his last name O'Rourke - thought you would like to know :-)
 
 Ed.
 
 
 
 On Nov 9, 2007 12:14 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Well, that sucks, but it's not unexpected.  Kodak is run by the best
 available MBAs after all.

 Scott Loveless wrote:
 Dated November 2.
 http://www.kodak.com/global/en/professional/products/films/discontinuedNotice.jhtml?id=0.2.26.14.25lc=en

 http://tinyurl.com/22aq9o

 I don't use the slide films they're discontinuing, but the HIE kinda hurts.



 --
 The difference between individual intelligence and group intelligence is the 
 difference between Harvard University and the Harvard University football 
 team.

 -- P. J. O'Roark



 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
 follow the directions.

 



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Kodak discontinues HIE and a bunch of Ektachrome

[P. J. Alling]

It is because MBAs use esoteric methods to come to the conclusion that 
short term profits, (a 5 year time horizon usually), drive long term 
goals.  This is an example of that kind of thinking.  If you're an MBA, 
I'd like to say I'm sorry if you're offended, but I'm not.  Since I cut 
an pasted the quote from someone else's web site, I don't really care 
that much.  It will be changing some time soon anyway.  Probably by 
another O'Roarke quote but I've got my eye on one by Throup.   This is 
after all a mailing list.  How much care should one give it?


Ed Matthew wrote:
 So it is the damned MBA's who want to make the corporation profitable?
 I thought it was because digital capture is rapidly replacing
 transparency film. Thanks for clearing that up for me.

 I switched to Fuji slide film years ago, but I will miss HIE.

 BTW, P.J. spells his last name O'Rourke - thought you would like to know :-)

 Ed.



 On Nov 9, 2007 12:14 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   
 Well, that sucks, but it's not unexpected.  Kodak is run by the best
 available MBAs after all.

 Scott Loveless wrote:
 
 Dated November 2.
 http://www.kodak.com/global/en/professional/products/films/discontinuedNotice.jhtml?id=0.2.26.14.25lc=en

 http://tinyurl.com/22aq9o

 I don't use the slide films they're discontinuing, but the HIE kinda hurts.


   
 --
 The difference between individual intelligence and group intelligence is the 
 difference between Harvard University and the Harvard University football 
 team.

 -- P. J. O'Roark



 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
 follow the directions.

 

   


-- 
The difference between individual intelligence and group intelligence is the 
difference between Harvard University and the Harvard University football team.

-- P. J. O'Roark


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Kodak discontinues HIE and a bunch of Ektachrome

[Godfrey DiGiorgi]

On Nov 9, 2007, at 8:29 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:

 Dated November 2.
 http://www.kodak.com/global/en/professional/products/films/ 
 discontinuedNotice.jhtml?id=0.2.26.14.25lc=en

 http://tinyurl.com/22aq9o

 I don't use the slide films they're discontinuing, but the HIE  
 kinda hurts.

Pontificating on the notion of who's to blame seems such a waste of  
time. MBAs notwithstanding, the answer is all of us. If film was  
still profitable, Kodak would be expanding its offerings. It is us,  
the collective mass of all who do photography in whatever form, who  
have told Kodak what is profitable by voting with our wallets.

Film has lost the incumbent seat it held for 100 years. Newer capture  
media has taken its place. Film is dead. Long live film.

Godfrey

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Kodak discontinues HIE and a bunch of Ektachrome

[Adam Maas]

Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
 On Nov 9, 2007, at 8:29 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
 
 Dated November 2.
 http://www.kodak.com/global/en/professional/products/films/ 
 discontinuedNotice.jhtml?id=0.2.26.14.25lc=en

 http://tinyurl.com/22aq9o

 I don't use the slide films they're discontinuing, but the HIE  
 kinda hurts.
 
 Pontificating on the notion of who's to blame seems such a waste of  
 time. MBAs notwithstanding, the answer is all of us. If film was  
 still profitable, Kodak would be expanding its offerings. It is us,  
 the collective mass of all who do photography in whatever form, who  
 have told Kodak what is profitable by voting with our wallets.
 
 Film has lost the incumbent seat it held for 100 years. Newer capture  
 media has taken its place. Film is dead. Long live film.
 
 Godfrey
 

Film certainly is still profitable, at least for Fuji and Ilford, as 
well as the smaller makers. It's not the dominant choice anymore.

But Kodak has done everything possible to drive film users away, with 
its public statements as well as its handling of a number of products 
(including two which were unique to Kodak. Those being Tech Pan and 
HIE). As Kodak has made clear that they don't value film user's 
business, said users have moved over to Fuji, Ilford and others for 
their work. And the fact that many of Fuji's films in particular are 
clearly superior in performance makes this all the easier. With HIE 
dead, the only reason to shoot Kodak is the Portra NC's and Tri-X. And 
the latter only for traditionalists.

-Adam

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Outdated ektachrome???

[mike wilson]

 
 From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Date: 2005/12/13 Tue AM 05:39:26 GMT
 To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
 Subject: Outdated ektachrome???
 
 I'm trying to decide if it's even worth shooting this stuff.  I've got 
 several rolls of 120 size Ektachrome dated 1999.  It's all e6 
 professional and it's been kept refrigerated.  Anybody have any 
 experience shooting film this old, what the age effects are, how much, 
 (percentage since the initial speed ratings are all different) to 
 compensate for lost sensitivity, that sort of thing.  Any suggestions 
 would be appreciated.

I've shot stuff about as old as this that had an unknown to me history. 
Although I'm sure there would be some differences to fresh film, I could not 
see anything that made me want to check it against new film.

mike


-
Email sent from www.ntlworld.com
Virus-checked using McAfee(R) Software 
Visit www.ntlworld.com/security for more information

Re: Outdated ektachrome???

[Paul Stenquist]

If it's been refrigerated, It's probably good. I've shot some very old 
ektachrome with good results.

Paul
On Dec 13, 2005, at 12:39 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:

I'm trying to decide if it's even worth shooting this stuff.  I've got 
several rolls of 120 size Ektachrome dated 1999.  It's all e6 
professional and it's been kept refrigerated.  Anybody have any 
experience shooting film this old, what the age effects are, how much, 
(percentage since the initial speed ratings are all different) to 
compensate for lost sensitivity, that sort of thing.  Any suggestions 
would be appreciated.


--
When you're worried or in doubt,Run in circles, (scream and shout).

Re: Outdated ektachrome???

[William Robb]

- Original Message - 
From: P. J. Alling 
Subject: Outdated ektachrome???



I'm trying to decide if it's even worth shooting this stuff.  I've got 
several rolls of 120 size Ektachrome dated 1999.  It's all e6 
professional and it's been kept refrigerated.  Anybody have any 
experience shooting film this old, what the age effects are, how much, 
(percentage since the initial speed ratings are all different) to 
compensate for lost sensitivity, that sort of thing.  Any suggestions 
would be appreciated.


Shoot it.

William Robb

Re: Outdated ektachrome???

[Bob Shell]

Same here.  If it's been refrigerated it should still be good for  
quite a while.


Bob

On Dec 13, 2005, at 6:47 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:

If it's been refrigerated, It's probably good. I've shot some very  
old ektachrome with good results.

Paul
On Dec 13, 2005, at 12:39 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:

I'm trying to decide if it's even worth shooting this stuff.  I've  
got several rolls of 120 size Ektachrome dated 1999.  It's all e6  
professional and it's been kept refrigerated.  Anybody have any  
experience shooting film this old, what the age effects are, how  
much, (percentage since the initial speed ratings are all  
different) to compensate for lost sensitivity, that sort of  
thing.  Any suggestions would be appreciated.


--
When you're worried or in doubt,Run in circles, (scream and shout).

Outdated ektachrome???

[P. J. Alling]

I'm trying to decide if it's even worth shooting this stuff.  I've got 
several rolls of 120 size Ektachrome dated 1999.  It's all e6 
professional and it's been kept refrigerated.  Anybody have any 
experience shooting film this old, what the age effects are, how much, 
(percentage since the initial speed ratings are all different) to 
compensate for lost sensitivity, that sort of thing.  Any suggestions 
would be appreciated.


--
When you're worried or in doubt, 
	Run in circles, (scream and shout).

Ebay - Kodak Ektachrome Medium Format Film

[James Adams]

I can't bid on this though I would like to:
Kodak Ektachrome Medium Format Film
... 20 rolls of Kodak Ektachrome Color Film. 120 format, 26 rolls are 64
speed, one roll is 100.
 http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1347831554

Thought it might be of interest to you.
James
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Ektachrome differences?

[Albano_Garcia]

What's the difference between Ektachrome E series and the other
Ektachromes?
Regards

AG
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Re: Velvia vs Ektachrome 100 VS

[David A. Mann]

Mark Roberts writes:

 Different color balances, difinitely. The Kodak E100SW is
 supposedly much more like Velvia.

 I think you might have confused SW with VS in that statement.  E100SW is 
nothing like Velvia, which is why I like it so much.

Cheers,


- Dave

David A. Mann, B.E.
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/

"Why is it that if an adult behaves like a child they lock him up,
 while children are allowed to run free on the streets?" -- Garfield
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .