Re: Film scanners (ahem)

2006-05-11 Thread Toralf Lund

Juan Buhler wrote:

I had a bit of an epiphany yesterday.

[ ... ]

I still have my Polaroid SprintScan 4000, and I'm happy with its
results. It is SCSI though, which means I have to use it from my old
PC--this is the only reason that PC hasn't been discarded yet.
So, will you be selling the SprintScan 4000? I'm sort of looking for a 
decent, not-too expensive film scanner. Actually, I have a Minolta Scan 
Dual (first version) that I got hold of for next to nothing, but I'm not 
too impressed with the results (this scanner has fixed focus, and only 8 
bits per channel.)




Re: Film scanners (ahem)

2006-05-09 Thread Steve Jolly

Juan Buhler wrote:

I still have my Polaroid SprintScan 4000, and I'm happy with its
results. It is SCSI though, which means I have to use it from my old
PC--this is the only reason that PC hasn't been discarded yet.


Far be it from me to discourage enablement on this list, but have you 
considered getting a SCSI adapter for your new computer?


S



Re: Film scanners (ahem)

2006-05-09 Thread Thibouille

What computer do you have now?
You can buy a scsi adapter for your new PC.
There are even converter USB - SCSI. You might try one.

2006/5/8, Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

I had a bit of an epiphany yesterday.

I went shooting to a Polish festival in Golden Gate Park. There was
music and dancing indoors, and I started shooting with the istD. Even
with the FA35, focusing was not completely trivial, given the light.
So I pulled the Leica off the bag, and shot a couple of (expired)
rolls of Tri-X with it. Wow. I had forgotten how much I love that
camera. It becomes an invisible tool, blends with your eyes and hands
and just gets out of the way of taking photographs.

So I think I might be shooting a bit more film in the future, at least
until there's a nice digital rangefinder for about the price of a
DSLR.

I still have my Polaroid SprintScan 4000, and I'm happy with its
results. It is SCSI though, which means I have to use it from my old
PC--this is the only reason that PC hasn't been discarded yet.

So the question for those of you still in the stone age is: what is a
good USB film scanner? Are resolutions still around 4000dpi for the
high end ones? What should I get?

I'm not getting rid of the istD anytime yet, and will probably get a
K100D or whatever is called when it comes out. But shooting with a
Leica RF is so great that I don't want to give that up...

Cheers,

j

--
Juan Buhler
Check out my book: http://www.jbuhler.com/book.html
Water Molotov: http://photoblog.jbuhler.com
Slippery Slope: http://color.jbuhler.com





--
--
Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SFXn,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ...



Re: Film scanners (ahem)

2006-05-09 Thread Aaron Reynolds


On May 9, 2006, at 3:10 AM, Steve Jolly wrote:

Far be it from me to discourage enablement on this list, but have you 
considered getting a SCSI adapter for your new computer?


I was going to suggest this, too -- the Sprintscan 4000 ain't no 
slouch, as far as I can remember.  I'm still using my Sprintscan 120, 
which is a truly fantastic performer.


-Aaron



Re: Film scanners (ahem)

2006-05-09 Thread Rob Studdert
On 9 May 2006 at 7:48, Aaron Reynolds wrote:

 
 On May 9, 2006, at 3:10 AM, Steve Jolly wrote:
 
  Far be it from me to discourage enablement on this list, but have you 
  considered getting a SCSI adapter for your new computer?
 
 I was going to suggest this, too -- the Sprintscan 4000 ain't no 
 slouch, as far as I can remember.  I'm still using my Sprintscan 120, 
 which is a truly fantastic performer.

Missed the thread up to now. The SS4000 is a great performer, definitely worth 
keeping. It's pretty easy to add a SCSI card to most PCs, I have a few decent 
cards spare, let me know if you would like one.


Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http:/home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998



Film scanners (ahem)

2006-05-08 Thread Juan Buhler

I had a bit of an epiphany yesterday.

I went shooting to a Polish festival in Golden Gate Park. There was
music and dancing indoors, and I started shooting with the istD. Even
with the FA35, focusing was not completely trivial, given the light.
So I pulled the Leica off the bag, and shot a couple of (expired)
rolls of Tri-X with it. Wow. I had forgotten how much I love that
camera. It becomes an invisible tool, blends with your eyes and hands
and just gets out of the way of taking photographs.

So I think I might be shooting a bit more film in the future, at least
until there's a nice digital rangefinder for about the price of a
DSLR.

I still have my Polaroid SprintScan 4000, and I'm happy with its
results. It is SCSI though, which means I have to use it from my old
PC--this is the only reason that PC hasn't been discarded yet.

So the question for those of you still in the stone age is: what is a
good USB film scanner? Are resolutions still around 4000dpi for the
high end ones? What should I get?

I'm not getting rid of the istD anytime yet, and will probably get a
K100D or whatever is called when it comes out. But shooting with a
Leica RF is so great that I don't want to give that up...

Cheers,

j

--
Juan Buhler
Check out my book: http://www.jbuhler.com/book.html
Water Molotov: http://photoblog.jbuhler.com
Slippery Slope: http://color.jbuhler.com



Re: Film scanners (ahem)

2006-05-08 Thread Adam Maas
I'd recommend the Nikon CoolScan V for a 4000dpi scanner. Minolta did 
make a couple 5400dpi models, but they provided no real resolution 
increase over the 4000dpi models.


Personally I'm using a 2820dpi Minolta Scan Dual III, which is cheap and 
quite good.


-Adam


Juan Buhler wrote:


I had a bit of an epiphany yesterday.

I went shooting to a Polish festival in Golden Gate Park. There was
music and dancing indoors, and I started shooting with the istD. Even
with the FA35, focusing was not completely trivial, given the light.
So I pulled the Leica off the bag, and shot a couple of (expired)
rolls of Tri-X with it. Wow. I had forgotten how much I love that
camera. It becomes an invisible tool, blends with your eyes and hands
and just gets out of the way of taking photographs.

So I think I might be shooting a bit more film in the future, at least
until there's a nice digital rangefinder for about the price of a
DSLR.

I still have my Polaroid SprintScan 4000, and I'm happy with its
results. It is SCSI though, which means I have to use it from my old
PC--this is the only reason that PC hasn't been discarded yet.

So the question for those of you still in the stone age is: what is a
good USB film scanner? Are resolutions still around 4000dpi for the
high end ones? What should I get?

I'm not getting rid of the istD anytime yet, and will probably get a
K100D or whatever is called when it comes out. But shooting with a
Leica RF is so great that I don't want to give that up...

Cheers,

j

--
Juan Buhler
Check out my book: http://www.jbuhler.com/book.html
Water Molotov: http://photoblog.jbuhler.com
Slippery Slope: http://color.jbuhler.com





Re: Film scanners (ahem)

2006-05-08 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi


On May 8, 2006, at 11:53 AM, Juan Buhler wrote:

... So I think I might be shooting a bit more film in the future,  
at least

until there's a nice digital rangefinder for about the price of a
DSLR.


Sadly, I don't think that will happen. According to dealer friends,  
sales of the Epson RD-1 have been only ok at best, and the  
likelihood of the upcoming Leica digital camera compatible with M  
lenses, or the Zeiss Ikon that is sure to happen as well, being in  
*ist D/DS price bracket are vanishingly small.


I'd like one too, but I think $2000-3000 is going to be where it will  
cost at the low end.



I still have my Polaroid SprintScan 4000, and I'm happy with its
results. It is SCSI though, which means I have to use it from my old
PC--this is the only reason that PC hasn't been discarded yet.

So the question for those of you still in the stone age is: what is a
good USB film scanner? Are resolutions still around 4000dpi for the
high end ones? What should I get?


There are higher end models, but the Nikon Coolscan V ED is about as  
good as it gets for 4000 ppi, which is generally as good as most  
anyone needs for 35mm film scanning, around $550. They have a higher  
priced model with more features and attachment possibilities, but  
most of those things aren't of much interest to me...


Minola, nee Konica Minolta, had a 5400 ppi film scanner through two/ 
three model revisions, but I believe that's gone now. You might find  
one still in stock somewhere. The other option is something like the  
Epson flatbed scanners, which I'm told in their latest revisions can  
rival dedicated film scanners.


Godfrey



Film scanners (ahem)

2006-05-08 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Hi Juan ...

For the money the Nikon Coolscan V is an excellent scanner.  I've been
happy with mine.  However, if I had it to do all over again, I'd have spent
the extra $$ and gotten the Coolscan 5000.  It works in 16-bit rather than
14-bit, allows multi-pass scanning, plus it takes the roll feeder accessory.

Admittedly, these are small issues, and I'm not sure the Coolscan 5000 is
really worth about twice the price, but there are times when I wish one or
another of its features were available.


Shel