Re: LR 3.4 and lenses correction profiles (whole lot more)
I noticed that this one, http://attilaacs.wordpress.com/2010/05/03/download-my-adobe-lens-profile-for-pentax-10-17mm-fisheye-lens/ , seems to be better with the CA. Stig Vidar Hovland Fra: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] på vegne av Toine [to...@repiuk.nl] Sendt: 27. april 2011 18:46 Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Emne: Re: LR 3.4 and lenses correction profiles (whole lot more) Yep. And correcting the CA manually gives beter results. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: LR 3.4 and lenses correction profiles (whole lot more)
Yep. And correcting the CA manually gives beter results. On 27 April 2011 17:42, Matthew Hunt wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Charles Robinson wrote: >> On Apr 27, 2011, at 10:33, Toine wrote: >> >>> The DA 10-17 is also included. The correction is a complete defish and >>> the end result is very ugly... >>> >> >> It's quite difficult to fathom what else one could do for a lens >> "correction" on a fisheye. > > You could correct it from an imperfect equiangular projection to a > perfect equiangular projection. Just as you correct an imperfect > rectilinear projection to a perfect rectilinear projection, in the > case of rectilinear lenses. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: LR 3.4 and lenses correction profiles (whole lot more)
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Charles Robinson wrote: > On Apr 27, 2011, at 10:33, Toine wrote: > >> The DA 10-17 is also included. The correction is a complete defish and >> the end result is very ugly... >> > > It's quite difficult to fathom what else one could do for a lens "correction" > on a fisheye. You could correct it from an imperfect equiangular projection to a perfect equiangular projection. Just as you correct an imperfect rectilinear projection to a perfect rectilinear projection, in the case of rectilinear lenses. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: LR 3.4 and lenses correction profiles (whole lot more)
On Apr 27, 2011, at 10:33, Toine wrote: > The DA 10-17 is also included. The correction is a complete defish and > the end result is very ugly... > It's quite difficult to fathom what else one could do for a lens "correction" on a fisheye. -Charles -- Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com Minneapolis, MN http://charles.robinsontwins.org http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: LR 3.4 and lenses correction profiles (whole lot more)
The DA 10-17 is also included. The correction is a complete defish and the end result is very ugly... Toine On 27 April 2011 08:48, Thibouille wrote: > Link: > http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-news-rumors/141875-new-lightroom-update-includes-trillion-pentax-lens-profiles.html > > smc PENTAX-DA L 55-300mm F4-5.8 ED > smc PENTAX-DA L 50-200mm F4-5.6 ED > smc PENTAX-DA L 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL > smc PENTAX-DA 55-300mm F4-5.8 ED > smc PENTAX-DA 50-200mm F4-5.6 ED > smc PENTAX-DA 50-200mm F4-5.6 ED WR > smc PENTAX-DA 35mm F2.4 AL > smc PENTAX-DA 18-250mm F3.5-6.3 ED AL [IF] > smc PENTAX-DA 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL > smc PENTAX-DA 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL WR > smc PENTAX-DA 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL II > smc PENTAX-DA 17-70mm F4 AL [IF] SDM > smc PENTAX-DA 16-45mm F4 ED AL > smc PENTAX-DA 14mm F2.8 ED[IF] > smc PENTAX-DA 12-24mm F4 ED AL [IF] > smc PENTAX-D FA 100mm F2.8 MACRO > smc PENTAX-D FA MACRO 100mm F2.8 WR > smc PENTAX-D FA 50mm F2.8 MACRO > > > -- > Thibault Massart aka Thibouille/Thibs > -- > Photo: K-7, Sigma 28/1.8 macro, FA50/1.4, DA40Ltd, K30/2.8, DA16-45, > DA50-135, DA50-200, 360FGZ > KX, MX, SuperA+Motor, Z1, P30 > Mamiya C330+80/2.8 > Sekonic L-208 > FalconEyes TE300D x2 Studio flashes > > Laptop: Macbook 13" Unibody SnowLeo/Win7 > > Programing: Delphi 2009 > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: LR 3.4 and lenses correction profiles (whole lot more)
On Apr 27, 2011, at 9:12, Charles Robinson wrote: > > BTW - is there any way to highlight a group of shots and turn on the lens > profile correction for all of them "en masse"? > (Answering my own question) Select all images shot with the particular lens. "Develop" one of them, select profile correction, then COPY the development settings. Uncheck all, then just check "Lens Profile Correction". Select ALL images, paste the copied setting. -Charles -- Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com Minneapolis, MN http://charles.robinsontwins.org http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: LR 3.4 and lenses correction profiles (whole lot more)
On Apr 27, 2011, at 8:26, Stan Halpin wrote: >> On Apr 27, 2011, at 7:26 AM, Matthew Hunt wrote: >> >> How you omit the kit lens from the initial release, I'll never understand. > > Two possibilities occur to me. One is that the kit lens is so good that > minimal correction is needed. Second is that Pentax and/or Adobe may be > assuming that purchasers of a body with kit lens are not necessarily the > consumers who will immediately rush out and buy sophisticated post-processing > and cataloging tools. > I just went back to a series of prints that I shot with the kit lens back in August. Turned on profile/correction for all of them and was surprised to see the edges brighten up (didn't notice vignetting before, but I guess it was there) and the field flattening out a bit (hadn't noticed the distortion, either). So... there is SOME correction going on there - but nothing too severe. Nice to have that in there for the rare times I use the 18-55! BTW - is there any way to highlight a group of shots and turn on the lens profile correction for all of them "en masse"? -Charles -- Charles Robinson - charl...@visi.com Minneapolis, MN http://charles.robinsontwins.org http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: LR 3.4 and lenses correction profiles (whole lot more)
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > It could also be that they found some errors and updated the correction files. No, profiles for the 18-55 lenses were not present in LR 3.3. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: LR 3.4 and lenses correction profiles (whole lot more)
Or it could be that Pentax is lower on the priority list than Canon or Nikon, and they got the profiles from Pentax later. On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:04 AM, Matthew Hunt wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Stan Halpin > wrote: > >>> How you omit the kit lens from the initial release, I'll never understand. >> >> Two possibilities occur to me. One is that the kit lens is so good that >> minimal correction is needed. Second is that Pentax and/or Adobe may be >> assuming that purchasers of a body with kit lens are not necessarily the >> consumers who will immediately rush out and buy sophisticated >> post-processing and cataloging tools. > > I'm more inclined to go with a "not giving enough of a damn about > Pentax to think it through" explanation. > > Your first hypothesis is unlikely; they provide profiles for better > lenses than the kit lens. > > The second hypothesis may be true, but it gets the conditional > probabilities backwards. Even if people with the kit lens are less > likely to buy Lightroom, I'm sure there are more Lightroom owners who > use the kit lens than, say, the DA*55 or 15/4. > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- David Parsons Photography http://www.davidparsonsphoto.com Aloha Photographer Photoblog http://alohaphotog.blogspot.com/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: LR 3.4 and lenses correction profiles (whole lot more)
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Stan Halpin wrote: >> How you omit the kit lens from the initial release, I'll never understand. > > Two possibilities occur to me. One is that the kit lens is so good that > minimal correction is needed. Second is that Pentax and/or Adobe may be > assuming that purchasers of a body with kit lens are not necessarily the > consumers who will immediately rush out and buy sophisticated post-processing > and cataloging tools. I'm more inclined to go with a "not giving enough of a damn about Pentax to think it through" explanation. Your first hypothesis is unlikely; they provide profiles for better lenses than the kit lens. The second hypothesis may be true, but it gets the conditional probabilities backwards. Even if people with the kit lens are less likely to buy Lightroom, I'm sure there are more Lightroom owners who use the kit lens than, say, the DA*55 or 15/4. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: LR 3.4 and lenses correction profiles (whole lot more)
It could also be that they found some errors and updated the correction files. Myself, I never owned the "kit" lenses at all and would never miss the corrections. On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 6:26 AM, Stan Halpin wrote: >> On Apr 27, 2011, at 7:26 AM, Matthew Hunt wrote: >> >>> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Thibouille wrote: >> >>> smc PENTAX-DA 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL >>> smc PENTAX-DA 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL WR >>> smc PENTAX-DA 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL II >> >> How you omit the kit lens from the initial release, I'll never understand. > > Two possibilities occur to me. One is that the kit lens is so good that > minimal correction is needed. Second is that Pentax and/or Adobe may be > assuming that purchasers of a body with kit lens are not necessarily the > consumers who will immediately rush out and buy sophisticated post-processing > and cataloging tools. > > stan > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- Godfrey godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: LR 3.4 and lenses correction profiles (whole lot more)
> On Apr 27, 2011, at 7:26 AM, Matthew Hunt wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Thibouille wrote: > >> smc PENTAX-DA 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL >> smc PENTAX-DA 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL WR >> smc PENTAX-DA 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL II > > How you omit the kit lens from the initial release, I'll never understand. Two possibilities occur to me. One is that the kit lens is so good that minimal correction is needed. Second is that Pentax and/or Adobe may be assuming that purchasers of a body with kit lens are not necessarily the consumers who will immediately rush out and buy sophisticated post-processing and cataloging tools. stan -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
Re: LR 3.4 and lenses correction profiles (whole lot more)
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 2:48 AM, Thibouille wrote: > smc PENTAX-DA 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL > smc PENTAX-DA 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL WR > smc PENTAX-DA 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL II How you omit the kit lens from the initial release, I'll never understand. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
LR 3.4 and lenses correction profiles (whole lot more)
Link: http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-news-rumors/141875-new-lightroom-update-includes-trillion-pentax-lens-profiles.html smc PENTAX-DA L 55-300mm F4-5.8 ED smc PENTAX-DA L 50-200mm F4-5.6 ED smc PENTAX-DA L 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL smc PENTAX-DA 55-300mm F4-5.8 ED smc PENTAX-DA 50-200mm F4-5.6 ED smc PENTAX-DA 50-200mm F4-5.6 ED WR smc PENTAX-DA 35mm F2.4 AL smc PENTAX-DA 18-250mm F3.5-6.3 ED AL [IF] smc PENTAX-DA 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL smc PENTAX-DA 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL WR smc PENTAX-DA 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 AL II smc PENTAX-DA 17-70mm F4 AL [IF] SDM smc PENTAX-DA 16-45mm F4 ED AL smc PENTAX-DA 14mm F2.8 ED[IF] smc PENTAX-DA 12-24mm F4 ED AL [IF] smc PENTAX-D FA 100mm F2.8 MACRO smc PENTAX-D FA MACRO 100mm F2.8 WR smc PENTAX-D FA 50mm F2.8 MACRO -- Thibault Massart aka Thibouille/Thibs -- Photo: K-7, Sigma 28/1.8 macro, FA50/1.4, DA40Ltd, K30/2.8, DA16-45, DA50-135, DA50-200, 360FGZ KX, MX, SuperA+Motor, Z1, P30 Mamiya C330+80/2.8 Sekonic L-208 FalconEyes TE300D x2 Studio flashes Laptop: Macbook 13" Unibody SnowLeo/Win7 Programing: Delphi 2009 -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
