Re: Lasse V. Collin, formerly Re: My own DOF confusion
On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 22:32:51 +, you wrote: >I don't think members should put political opinions in sig lines. This >one offends me, and others may have problems with it too. > > >Cheers, > Cotty > > >___/\__ >|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche >||=|www.macads.co.uk/snaps >_ > All them damn repetitive sig lines offend me, even my own. What say we make it a rule - change sigs every week, kinda like a PAW, no more than 55 characters for the sig subject, plus one attribution line and one name line, and of course the required "--" and carriage return that makes the sig identifiable as a sig and not a continuation of the text. Anyone using the same sig two weeks in a row has to apologize. Profusely. And repetitively. Over and Over. -- John Mustarde Yo Mama Loves FOSI (unknown)
Re: Lasse V. Collin, formerly Re: My own DOF confusion
Frits, I understand that list decorum is something to be attentive to. Hence this is, in my opinion, a suitable point relating to the framework of discussions. Are my current sig choices unacceptable as well? (see below) Where does one draw the line? If it the simple principle of civility, then how was that broached by the earlier content? These are openly "evangelical" Christian items. That basis may offend some. But they'll get over it. I'm philosophically opposed to the principles behind Hermann Hesse quote yet I don't demean the poster. I got over it. Collin * - "You can impress people at a distance, but you can only impact them up close." -- Howard Hendricks - Toward the end of his life, George Truett was asked what he would do differently if he had his life to live over again. He said, "I would have spent more time with a few people." quoted from Discipleship Call Perspective http://disciplescall.gospelcom.net/perspective/ * >Date: 23 Mar 2004 18:55:36 +0100 >From: Frits =?ISO-8859-1?Q?W=FCthrich?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >I agree with Lasse, this is no place for a text like that, whether it is >a sig or not. Continuation of using it doesn't make it OK.
Re: Lasse V. Collin, formerly Re: My own DOF confusion
> > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 4:57 AM > Subject: Lasse V. Collin, formerly Re: My own DOF confusion > > > > Lasse & Collin: > > Surely your dispute could be taken off-list? > > Thanks. > > No way. This is a list issue, and not a personal dispute. > > Lasse Rubbish. Most of the list is quite capable of ignoring the matter. It's just the two of you who are incapable of doing anything other than conducting a childish squabble, in public, in a totally inappropriate forum. You're only arguing because you disagree on a political issue. It's got nothing to do with photography. Take it outside.
Re: Lasse V. Collin, formerly Re: My own DOF confusion
I said: > > Lasse & Collin: > > Surely your dispute could be taken off-list? > > Thanks. Lasse replied: > No way. This is a list issue, and not a personal dispute. I disagree, Lasse. Collin has been using that sig line for quite a while. Everybody has seen it by now. You're the only one who has chosen to respond by attacking him personally. Apparently everyone else who doesn't agree with him is content to ignore it. That's usual for sig lines. A "list issue" response would be something like "I don't think members should put political opinions in sig lines. This one offends me, and others may have problems with it too." What you actually did was cuss him out directly and send your personal attack to the list. See the difference?
Re: Lasse V. Collin, formerly Re: My own DOF confusion
Lasse will get his medication right quite soon. All the best! Raimo K Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > Lasse & Collin: > Surely your dispute could be taken off-list? > Thanks. > >
Lasse V. Collin, formerly Re: My own DOF confusion
Lasse & Collin: Surely your dispute could be taken off-list? Thanks.
