Re: New camera technology touted at TOP

2011-06-23 Thread Carlos R.
For the people who may be interested in plenoptic technology, some 
months ago a group of Spanish investigators from the Canary Islands 
showed a device which can turn any digital camera with interchangeable 
lenses into a plenoptic camera.


You can read something about it here:

http://www.quesabesde.com/noticias/camara-plenoptica-3d-ull-universidad-la-laguna_cafadis,1_7561

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: New camera technology touted at TOP

2011-06-23 Thread John Sessoms

From: Carlos R.


For the people who may be interested in plenoptic technology, some
months ago a group of Spanish investigators from the Canary Islands
showed a device which can turn any digital camera with interchangeable
lenses into a plenoptic camera.

You can read something about it here:

http://www.quesabesde.com/noticias/camara-plenoptica-3d-ull-universidad-la-laguna_cafadis,1_7561


I don't suppose there's an english language page for this? It's a little 
too much for Babel Fish.



-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1382 / Virus Database: 1513/3721 - Release Date: 06/23/11


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: New camera technology touted at TOP

2011-06-23 Thread John Francis
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 01:58:59PM -0400, John Sessoms wrote:
 From: Carlos R.
 
 For the people who may be interested in plenoptic technology, some
 months ago a group of Spanish investigators from the Canary Islands
 showed a device which can turn any digital camera with interchangeable
 lenses into a plenoptic camera.
 
 You can read something about it here:
 
 http://www.quesabesde.com/noticias/camara-plenoptica-3d-ull-universidad-la-laguna_cafadis,1_7561
 
 I don't suppose there's an english language page for this? It's a
 little too much for Babel Fish.

Google Translate works just fine - that's what I used to read it.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


New camera technology touted at TOP

2011-06-22 Thread P. J. Alling
Maybe someone else has posted this, but I have a bit more than 8k 
messages from the PDML in my inbox, which I haven't even begun to wade 
trough, so I've decided to share.  Mike Johnston seems to think this is 
the future, but a little bit of research on the technology left me 
somewhat underwhelmed, perhaps because I was expecting some kind or real 
breakthrough, maybe having to do do with holographic principals, as 
opposed to massively processing different image planes.  Still it's an 
interesting concept.


http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2011/06/the-next-big-thing.html


--
Where's the Kaboom?  There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom!

--Marvin the Martian.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: New camera technology touted at TOP

2011-06-22 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
The plenoptic concept is making the rounds today. At least 14 people
have sent me notes about it. I've been tracking this technology from
the first discussions and talks about it in 2006ish, IIRC.

The idea is simple: Instead of capturing only spatial information from
the incoming light, capture the vector information as well. That
allows for in-process focus adjustment and more sophisticated image
correction processing. It's not 3D or holography, it's more
information with which to focus and render the image.

The downside of this is all technical. You generally need about 10x as
many photo receptors to produce a given number of finished image
pixels ... so a 12 Mpixel image relies on having somewhere around
120-144 million photosites behind them to capture both spatial and
vector data. Similarly, the image processing and data handling systems
have to be suitably robust to handle that amount of incoming data...

It's interesting, but I think that the big news is that some money is
being handed to Ted Ng now to develop his prototypes into a viable
production camera. The technology curve is catching up to the needs of
this kind of capture and processing, so a new game in photography
could happen in the near future.

On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 12:44 AM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
 Maybe someone else has posted this, but I have a bit more than 8k messages
 from the PDML in my inbox, which I haven't even begun to wade trough, so
 I've decided to share.  Mike Johnston seems to think this is the future, but
 a little bit of research on the technology left me somewhat underwhelmed,
 perhaps because I was expecting some kind or real breakthrough, maybe having
 to do do with holographic principals, as opposed to massively processing
 different image planes.  Still it's an interesting concept.

 http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2011/06/the-next-big-thing.html


 --
 Where's the Kaboom?  There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom!

        --Marvin the Martian.


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.




-- 
Godfrey
  godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: New camera technology touted at TOP

2011-06-22 Thread Matthew Hunt
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:

 The plenoptic concept is making the rounds today. At least 14 people
 have sent me notes about it.

By combining those notes in different ways, you can focus on different
aspects of the technology.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: New camera technology touted at TOP

2011-06-22 Thread Bulent Celasun
It seems to be capable of altering some phototographic approaches radically.
I expect dramatic contributions to macrophotography of static objects,
for example.
Sports photography may need some more time, though...

Bulent
-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/
http://photo.net/photodb/user?user_id=2226822
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/bulentcelasun




2011/6/23 P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com:
 Maybe someone else has posted this, but I have a bit more than 8k messages
 from the PDML in my inbox, which I haven't even begun to wade trough, so
 I've decided to share.  Mike Johnston seems to think this is the future, but
 a little bit of research on the technology left me somewhat underwhelmed,
 perhaps because I was expecting some kind or real breakthrough, maybe having
 to do do with holographic principals, as opposed to massively processing
 different image planes.  Still it's an interesting concept.

 http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2011/06/the-next-big-thing.html


 --
 Where's the Kaboom?  There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom!

        --Marvin the Martian.


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: New camera technology touted at TOP

2011-06-22 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Matthew Hunt m...@pobox.com wrote:
 On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:

 The plenoptic concept is making the rounds today. At least 14 people
 have sent me notes about it.

 By combining those notes in different ways, you can focus on different
 aspects of the technology.

Or make it a thoroughly senseless mish-mash of competing ideas if I want. ;-)

-- 
Godfrey
  godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: New camera technology touted at TOP

2011-06-22 Thread P. J. Alling

Well, I think it's the Segway of photography.

On 6/22/2011 3:58 PM, Bulent Celasun wrote:

It seems to be capable of altering some phototographic approaches radically.
I expect dramatic contributions to macrophotography of static objects,
for example.
Sports photography may need some more time, though...

Bulent
-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/
http://photo.net/photodb/user?user_id=2226822
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/bulentcelasun




2011/6/23 P. J. Allingwebstertwenty...@gmail.com:

Maybe someone else has posted this, but I have a bit more than 8k messages
from the PDML in my inbox, which I haven't even begun to wade trough, so
I've decided to share.  Mike Johnston seems to think this is the future, but
a little bit of research on the technology left me somewhat underwhelmed,
perhaps because I was expecting some kind or real breakthrough, maybe having
to do do with holographic principals, as opposed to massively processing
different image planes.  Still it's an interesting concept.

http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2011/06/the-next-big-thing.html


--
Where's the Kaboom?  There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom!

--Marvin the Martian.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.




--
Where's the Kaboom?  There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom!

--Marvin the Martian.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: New camera technology touted at TOP

2011-06-22 Thread Mark Roberts
[Default] On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 22:58:30 +0300, Bulent Celasun
bulent.cela...@gmail.com wrote:

It seems to be capable of altering some phototographic approaches radically.
I expect dramatic contributions to macrophotography of static objects,
for example.
Sports photography may need some more time, though...

Yep. Apparently you get a ~12:1 reduction in resolution in return for
this post-shot focus capability: Your 24-megapixel sensor becomes a 2
-megapixel sensor. It'll be interesting to see where this goes.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: New camera technology touted at TOP

2011-06-22 Thread Bruce Walker

Is that like being the Eagles of Death Metal?

On 11-06-23 4:39 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:

Well, I think it's the Segway of photography.

On 6/22/2011 3:58 PM, Bulent Celasun wrote:
It seems to be capable of altering some phototographic approaches 
radically.

I expect dramatic contributions to macrophotography of static objects,
for example.
Sports photography may need some more time, though...

Bulent
-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/
http://photo.net/photodb/user?user_id=2226822
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/bulentcelasun




2011/6/23 P. J. Allingwebstertwenty...@gmail.com:
Maybe someone else has posted this, but I have a bit more than 8k 
messages
from the PDML in my inbox, which I haven't even begun to wade 
trough, so
I've decided to share.  Mike Johnston seems to think this is the 
future, but
a little bit of research on the technology left me somewhat 
underwhelmed,
perhaps because I was expecting some kind or real breakthrough, 
maybe having
to do do with holographic principals, as opposed to massively 
processing

different image planes.  Still it's an interesting concept.

http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2011/06/the-next-big-thing.html 




--
Where's the Kaboom?  There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering 
Kaboom!


--Marvin the Martian.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.







--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: New camera technology touted at TOP

2011-06-22 Thread P. J. Alling
The original hype around the Segway was that it was going to change 
personal transportation forever. What it was was a technical tour d' 
force that  in reality changed almost nothing, it wasn't an anti gravity 
flying car or a personal transportation system.  The Segway was a device 
that couldn't do anything a healthy person couldn't do walking, and in 
fact couldn't even go cross country as well. This strikes me as the 
photographic equivalent. I expect that there's more of a market for a 
camera built on these principals as opposed to the Segway which is now 
the province of over weight rent-a-cops and the US Postal service, more 
than anything else.


On 6/22/2011 4:58 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:

Is that like being the Eagles of Death Metal?

On 11-06-23 4:39 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:

Well, I think it's the Segway of photography.

On 6/22/2011 3:58 PM, Bulent Celasun wrote:
It seems to be capable of altering some phototographic approaches 
radically.

I expect dramatic contributions to macrophotography of static objects,
for example.
Sports photography may need some more time, though...

Bulent
-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/
http://photo.net/photodb/user?user_id=2226822
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/bulentcelasun




2011/6/23 P. J. Allingwebstertwenty...@gmail.com:
Maybe someone else has posted this, but I have a bit more than 8k 
messages
from the PDML in my inbox, which I haven't even begun to wade 
trough, so
I've decided to share.  Mike Johnston seems to think this is the 
future, but
a little bit of research on the technology left me somewhat 
underwhelmed,
perhaps because I was expecting some kind or real breakthrough, 
maybe having
to do do with holographic principals, as opposed to massively 
processing

different image planes.  Still it's an interesting concept.

http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2011/06/the-next-big-thing.html 




--
Where's the Kaboom?  There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering 
Kaboom!


--Marvin the Martian.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.










--
Where's the Kaboom?  There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom!

--Marvin the Martian.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: New camera technology touted at TOP

2011-06-22 Thread Mark Roberts
[Default] On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 05:21:05 -0400, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:

The original hype around the Segway was that it was going to change 
personal transportation forever. What it was was a technical tour d' 
force that  in reality changed almost nothing

The inventor saw it as a replacement for the automobile. Everyone else
on the planet saw it as a replacement for walking.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: New camera technology touted at TOP

2011-06-22 Thread David Parsons
A whole lot of noise about a technology that could be done for a
thousandth of the cost by adding a third wheel?

On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 4:39 AM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
 Well, I think it's the Segway of photography.

 On 6/22/2011 3:58 PM, Bulent Celasun wrote:

 It seems to be capable of altering some phototographic approaches
 radically.
 I expect dramatic contributions to macrophotography of static objects,
 for example.
 Sports photography may need some more time, though...

 Bulent
 -
 http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/
 http://photo.net/photodb/user?user_id=2226822
 http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/bulentcelasun




 2011/6/23 P. J. Allingwebstertwenty...@gmail.com:

 Maybe someone else has posted this, but I have a bit more than 8k
 messages
 from the PDML in my inbox, which I haven't even begun to wade trough, so
 I've decided to share.  Mike Johnston seems to think this is the future,
 but
 a little bit of research on the technology left me somewhat underwhelmed,
 perhaps because I was expecting some kind or real breakthrough, maybe
 having
 to do do with holographic principals, as opposed to massively processing
 different image planes.  Still it's an interesting concept.


 http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2011/06/the-next-big-thing.html


 --
 Where's the Kaboom?  There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom!

        --Marvin the Martian.


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.



 --
 Where's the Kaboom?  There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom!

        --Marvin the Martian.


 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
 follow the directions.




-- 
David Parsons Photography
http://www.davidparsonsphoto.com

Aloha Photographer Photoblog
http://alohaphotog.blogspot.com/

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: New camera technology touted at TOP

2011-06-22 Thread John Francis
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 04:57:45PM -0400, Mark Roberts wrote:
 [Default] On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 22:58:30 +0300, Bulent Celasun
 bulent.cela...@gmail.com wrote:
 
 It seems to be capable of altering some phototographic approaches radically.
 I expect dramatic contributions to macrophotography of static objects,
 for example.
 Sports photography may need some more time, though...
 
 Yep. Apparently you get a ~12:1 reduction in resolution in return for
 this post-shot focus capability: Your 24-megapixel sensor becomes a 2
 -megapixel sensor. It'll be interesting to see where this goes.

Well, another turn of the wheel (or another couple of years) will double
the number of pixels, which will get it up into the reasonable range for
something a bit larger than a web image.  And you can actually do a little
better in software, if you tweak it for resolution rather than increased
DOF or dynamic focus. Or at least that's what the researchers said when
they gave a presentation at a Silicon Valley SIGGraph meeting last year.

By 2015 we'll probably have a plenoptic camera that outperforms my *ist-D.
Signal-to-noise ratios will still be far below what a K-5 can manage, but
the *ist-D is lacking in that department, too.  That didn't stop me getting
some pretty good images with it between 2003 and 2006, though.

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: New camera technology touted at TOP

2011-06-22 Thread P. J. Alling

Geez, I should really proof these before I hit send.

On 6/23/2011 5:21 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
The original hype around the Segway was that it was going to change 
personal transportation forever. What it was was a technical tour d' 
force that  in reality changed almost nothing, it wasn't an anti 
gravity flying car or a personal transportation system.  The Segway 
was a device that couldn't do anything a healthy person couldn't do 
walking, and in fact couldn't even go cross country as well. This 
strikes me as the photographic equivalent. I expect that there's more 
of a market for a camera built on these principals as opposed to the 
Segway which is now the province of over weight rent-a-cops and the US 
Postal service, more than anything else.


On 6/22/2011 4:58 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:

Is that like being the Eagles of Death Metal?

On 11-06-23 4:39 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:

Well, I think it's the Segway of photography.

On 6/22/2011 3:58 PM, Bulent Celasun wrote:
It seems to be capable of altering some phototographic approaches 
radically.

I expect dramatic contributions to macrophotography of static objects,
for example.
Sports photography may need some more time, though...

Bulent
-
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bc_the_path/
http://photo.net/photodb/user?user_id=2226822
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/bulentcelasun




2011/6/23 P. J. Allingwebstertwenty...@gmail.com:
Maybe someone else has posted this, but I have a bit more than 8k 
messages
from the PDML in my inbox, which I haven't even begun to wade 
trough, so
I've decided to share.  Mike Johnston seems to think this is the 
future, but
a little bit of research on the technology left me somewhat 
underwhelmed,
perhaps because I was expecting some kind or real breakthrough, 
maybe having
to do do with holographic principals, as opposed to massively 
processing

different image planes.  Still it's an interesting concept.

http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2011/06/the-next-big-thing.html 




--
Where's the Kaboom?  There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering 
Kaboom!


--Marvin the Martian.


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above 
and

follow the directions.













--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: New camera technology touted at TOP

2011-06-22 Thread Larry Colen

On Jun 23, 2011, at 2:21 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:

 The original hype around the Segway was that it was going to change personal 
 transportation forever. What it was was a technical tour d' force that  in 
 reality changed almost nothing, it wasn't an anti gravity flying car or a 
 personal transportation system.  The Segway was a device that couldn't do 
 anything a healthy person couldn't do walking, and in fact couldn't even go 
 cross country as well. This strikes me as the photographic equivalent. I 
 expect that there's more of a market for a camera built on these principals 
 as opposed to the Segway which is now the province of over weight rent-a-cops 
 and the US Postal service, more than anything else.

I've been doing some thinking about plenoptics and I don't see it as much the 
game changer in photography as I do in things like 3-d mapping.  If you can do 
things like change the depth of field, you can also do things like calculate 
the distance to each point in the image.  Imagine something like google's 
street view cars equipped with a version of this camera where each image can 
make a crude 3-d map of the buildings around the car, and then combining those 
images for a fairly high resolution 3-d map of a city, that is reasonably 
accurate at least at street level.

Another potential use for it would be to get a good 3-D map of someone's body, 
so that when they order clothes they can be cut to fit, in the desired color 
and fabric, sewn at slave labor rates and then shipped to your doorstep.

Likewise, realtors selling houses are already trying to do some sort of 360 
degree images, one of these cameras could be used to get very good 3-d models 
of each room for virtual tours.  Internal decorators, remodelers etc. could 
then modify those 3-d models to show their proposed changes.  You'd have to set 
the camera up several places in each room with good differential gps, but you 
could probably fudge by figuring out what parts of the room correspond with 
each other, like you do stitching 2-d images.


--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: New camera technology touted at TOP

2011-06-22 Thread John Sessoms
So, does this mean I should hold off on my plans to get the K3 (or 
whatever it's going to be called) once it comes out?


From: Godfrey DiGiorgi


The plenoptic concept is making the rounds today. At least 14 people
have sent me notes about it. I've been tracking this technology from
the first discussions and talks about it in 2006ish, IIRC.

The idea is simple: Instead of capturing only spatial information from
the incoming light, capture the vector information as well. That
allows for in-process focus adjustment and more sophisticated image
correction processing. It's not 3D or holography, it's more
information with which to focus and render the image.

The downside of this is all technical. You generally need about 10x as
many photo receptors to produce a given number of finished image
pixels ... so a 12 Mpixel image relies on having somewhere around
120-144 million photosites behind them to capture both spatial and
vector data. Similarly, the image processing and data handling systems
have to be suitably robust to handle that amount of incoming data...

It's interesting, but I think that the big news is that some money is
being handed to Ted Ng now to develop his prototypes into a viable
production camera. The technology curve is catching up to the needs of
this kind of capture and processing, so a new game in photography
could happen in the near future.



-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1382 / Virus Database: 1513/3718 - Release Date: 06/21/11


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: New camera technology touted at TOP

2011-06-22 Thread drd1135
The K3: the 64 GP massive matrix array holographic data reconstruction 125X 
zoom mirrorless Captain Marvel camera. 

Powered by a small pink spacetime singularly. $150 rebate coupon. 

Now accepting preorders. 
-Original Message-
From: John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 20:33:26 
To: pdml@pdml.net
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: New camera technology touted at TOP

So, does this mean I should hold off on my plans to get the K3 (or 
whatever it's going to be called) once it comes out?

From: Godfrey DiGiorgi

 The plenoptic concept is making the rounds today. At least 14 people
 have sent me notes about it. I've been tracking this technology from
 the first discussions and talks about it in 2006ish, IIRC.

 The idea is simple: Instead of capturing only spatial information from
 the incoming light, capture the vector information as well. That
 allows for in-process focus adjustment and more sophisticated image
 correction processing. It's not 3D or holography, it's more
 information with which to focus and render the image.

 The downside of this is all technical. You generally need about 10x as
 many photo receptors to produce a given number of finished image
 pixels ... so a 12 Mpixel image relies on having somewhere around
 120-144 million photosites behind them to capture both spatial and
 vector data. Similarly, the image processing and data handling systems
 have to be suitably robust to handle that amount of incoming data...

 It's interesting, but I think that the big news is that some money is
 being handed to Ted Ng now to develop his prototypes into a viable
 production camera. The technology curve is catching up to the needs of
 this kind of capture and processing, so a new game in photography
 could happen in the near future.


-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1382 / Virus Database: 1513/3718 - Release Date: 06/21/11


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: New camera technology touted at TOP

2011-06-22 Thread John Sessoms

From: Mark Roberts


[Default] On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 22:58:30 +0300, Bulent Celasun
bulent.cela...@gmail.com wrote:


It seems to be capable of altering some phototographic approaches
radically. I expect dramatic contributions to macrophotography of
static objects, for example. Sports photography may need some
more time, though...


Yep. Apparently you get a ~12:1 reduction in resolution in return
for this post-shot focus capability: Your 24-megapixel sensor becomes
a 2 -megapixel sensor. It'll be interesting to see where this goes.




I didn't know what plenoptic means, so I looked it up.

I eventually ended up at a Wikipedia page about the 4D light field ... 
I didn't understand all of it. Describing math that's beyond my grasp 
using words ain't my best subject.


But this part seems fairly simple:


In a plenoptic function, if the region of interest contains a concave
object (think of a cupped hand), then light leaving one point on the
object may travel only a short distance before being blocked by
another point on the object. No practical device could measure the
function in such a region.


It goes on to say if the locations are restricted to outside the convex 
hull ... of an object, the plenoptic function can be measured by a 
digital camera.


Most everything I photograph is made up of both concave  convex surfaces.

How do they overcome the problem with the concave ones? If they can't 
then only part of the photo works.



-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1382 / Virus Database: 1513/3718 - Release Date: 06/21/11


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: New camera technology touted at TOP

2011-06-22 Thread John Sessoms

From: P. J. Alling


The original hype around the Segway was that it was going to change
personal transportation forever. What it was was a technical tour d'
force that  in reality changed almost nothing, it wasn't an anti gravity
flying car or a personal transportation system.  The Segway was a device
that couldn't do anything a healthy person couldn't do walking, and in
fact couldn't even go cross country as well. This strikes me as the
photographic equivalent. I expect that there's more of a market for a
camera built on these principals as opposed to the Segway which is now
the province of over weight rent-a-cops and the US Postal service, more
than anything else.


http://citysegwaytours.com/


-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1382 / Virus Database: 1513/3718 - Release Date: 06/21/11


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.


Re: New camera technology touted at TOP

2011-06-22 Thread John Sessoms

From: Mark Roberts


[Default] On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 05:21:05 -0400, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:


The original hype around the Segway was that it was going to change
personal transportation forever. What it was was a technical tour d'
force that  in reality changed almost nothing

The inventor saw it as a replacement for the automobile. Everyone else
on the planet saw it as a replacement for walking.



It doesn't have the range of the automobile, so you still have to keep a 
car for longer trips. Nor does it have the all weather capability.


It does have a greater range than many people are able to walk nowadays.


-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1382 / Virus Database: 1513/3718 - Release Date: 06/21/11


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.