Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)

2006-05-19 Thread Jostein

Maybe he's a friend of JT LeRoy...:-)

Jostein

- Original Message - 
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do you think this guy actually has a psychopathic/identity problem 
or does he get his kicks this way?




He told me one time when he was berating me offlist (I probably 
deserved it) that all sorts of authours write under pseudonym.

I believe he mentioned Hemingway specifically.

William Robb





RE: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)

2006-05-18 Thread Bob W
 -Original Message-
 From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
  I believe that there was a thread with the wonderful subject line 
  Lobbing hand-grenades over the transom.  Perhaps it was 
 Throwing, 
  not lobbing.  But the thread title has stuck with me for a 
 number of 
  years, at least three -- gotta go look it up.
 
 I think Mafud was the major contributor to that one.
 

If I remember correctly, Mafud and Kirkland Ramsay III (Presbyterian) where
arguing vehemently against each other, with Matt (?) Grene providing
vociferous support to one of the main protagonists. What made it so special
is that all three of them were, in fact, the same person...

Bob




Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)

2006-05-18 Thread Christian

Bob W wrote:



If I remember correctly, Mafud and Kirkland Ramsay III (Presbyterian) where
arguing vehemently against each other, with Matt (?) Grene providing
vociferous support to one of the main protagonists. What made it so special
is that all three of them were, in fact, the same person...


I joined the list sometime around April, 2001 so I just missed the Mafud 
era.  After reading the above, I'm almost sorry I missed it! :-)


--

Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net



Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)

2006-05-18 Thread William Robb


- Original Message - 
From: Christian 
Subject: Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)






I joined the list sometime around April, 2001 so I just missed the Mafud 
era.  After reading the above, I'm almost sorry I missed it! :-)




He was fun for a while.
Push this button and see what happens was the game I enjoyed.
After it got predictable, it got boring.

William Robb



Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)

2006-05-18 Thread Norman Baugher
Didn't Brad Dodo join in somewhere to, but I believe he was replying to his 
own posts...

Norm

From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]

If I remember correctly, Mafud and Kirkland Ramsay III (Presbyterian) 
where

arguing vehemently against each other, with Matt (?) Grene providing
vociferous support to one of the main protagonists. What made it so 
special

is that all three of them were, in fact, the same person...





Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)

2006-05-18 Thread Joseph Tainter
If I remember correctly, Mafud and Kirkland Ramsay III (Presbyterian) 
where arguing vehemently against each other, with Matt (?) Grene 
providing vociferous support to one of the main protagonists. What made 
it so special is that all three of them were, in fact, the same person...


Wow. I remember Mafud but somehow I missed those exchanges entirely. I 
read the list in those days on Pentax's web site. Maybe Pentax censored 
that stuff. What a pity. I suppose the archive has gone to the digital 
aether.


Joe



Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)

2006-05-18 Thread Joseph Tainter

Mafud lives! Now dba Ed Greene:

http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00FVwmtag=

Joe



Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)

2006-05-18 Thread Don Williams
I remember Mafud and got some friendly off-list emails from him at one 
stage. But from Brad Dobo I got promises of bodily harm (that included 
the loss of all my teeth) in response to a diplomatic (and kindly I 
thought) suggestion that he seek help. I have a feeling I was not the 
only one threatened with mayhem.


Don

Joseph Tainter wrote:
If I remember correctly, Mafud and Kirkland Ramsay III (Presbyterian) 
where arguing vehemently against each other, with Matt (?) Grene 
providing vociferous support to one of the main protagonists. What 
made it so special is that all three of them were, in fact, the same 
person...


Wow. I remember Mafud but somehow I missed those exchanges entirely. I 
read the list in those days on Pentax's web site. Maybe Pentax 
censored that stuff. What a pity. I suppose the archive has gone to 
the digital aether.


Joe






--
Dr E D F Williams
www.kolumbus.fi/mimosa/
personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams/
41660 TOIVAKKA – Finland - +358400706616



Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)

2006-05-18 Thread Aaron Reynolds

OH MY GOD THAT THREAD HAS DEFINITIVE PROOF.

Thank you for sharing it, Joe.

-Aaron

On May 18, 2006, at 12:46 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:


Mafud lives! Now dba Ed Greene:

http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00FVwmtag=

Joe





Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)

2006-05-18 Thread Norman Baugher
Join the crowd...what a whack job. I do remember the look on TV's face, at 
GFM, when I introduced myself to him as Brad Dodo - it was rather 
frightening.

Norm

From: Don Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]


I remember Mafud and got some friendly off-list emails from him at one 
stage. But from Brad Dobo I got promises of bodily harm (that included the 
loss of all my teeth) in response to a diplomatic (and kindly I thought) 
suggestion that he seek help. I have a feeling I was not the only one 
threatened with mayhem.





Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)

2006-05-18 Thread Tom C

Wow, Wow, Wow!!! Thanks for the laugh!



Tom C.







From: Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 09:46:44 -0700

Mafud lives! Now dba Ed Greene:

http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00FVwmtag=

Joe






Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)

2006-05-18 Thread Jostein

Wow...
That's every bit as manic as I remember Mafud.

Jostein

- Original Message - 
From: Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 6:46 PM
Subject: Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)



Mafud lives! Now dba Ed Greene:

http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00FVwmtag=

Joe





Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)

2006-05-18 Thread Aaron Reynolds


On May 18, 2006, at 12:57 PM, Norman Baugher wrote:

Join the crowd...what a whack job. I do remember the look on TV's 
face, at GFM, when I introduced myself to him as Brad Dodo - it was 
rather frightening.


Oh, brilliant!  Wish I had thought of that.

-Aaron



Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)

2006-05-18 Thread pnstenquist
Actually, Bill Robb is Kirkland Ramsay, Mafud and Matt Grene. He denies it 
vociferously, of course, but those in the know have been aware of it for a long 
time. Other list members have assumed alter egos as well. Cotty once took on 
the persona of a lunatic school teacher from London, Ontario. He eventually 
tired of it.
Paul
 -- Original message --
From: Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 If I remember correctly, Mafud and Kirkland Ramsay III (Presbyterian) 
 where arguing vehemently against each other, with Matt (?) Grene 
 providing vociferous support to one of the main protagonists. What made 
 it so special is that all three of them were, in fact, the same person...
 
 Wow. I remember Mafud but somehow I missed those exchanges entirely. I 
 read the list in those days on Pentax's web site. Maybe Pentax censored 
 that stuff. What a pity. I suppose the archive has gone to the digital 
 aether.
 
 Joe
 



Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)

2006-05-18 Thread pnstenquist
Actually, Bill Robb is Kirkland Ramsay, Mafud and Matt Grene. He denies it 
vociferously, of course, but those in the know have been aware of it for a long 
time. Other list members have assumed alter egos as well. Cotty once took on 
the 
persona of a lunatic school teacher from London, Ontario. He eventually tired 
of 
it.
Paul
 -- Original message --
From: Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 If I remember correctly, Mafud and Kirkland Ramsay III (Presbyterian) 
 where arguing vehemently against each other, with Matt (?) Grene 
 providing vociferous support to one of the main protagonists. What made 
 it so special is that all three of them were, in fact, the same person...
 
 Wow. I remember Mafud but somehow I missed those exchanges entirely. I 
 read the list in those days on Pentax's web site. Maybe Pentax censored 
 that stuff. What a pity. I suppose the archive has gone to the digital 
 aether.
 
 Joe
 



Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)

2006-05-18 Thread William Robb


- Original Message - 
From: Joseph Tainter 
Subject: Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)




Mafud lives! Now dba Ed Greene:

http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00FVwmtag=


Yup.
Pseudo Mafud.
Fer sure.
I wonder if he'd remember me.

William Robb



Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)

2006-05-18 Thread Fred
 Actually, Bill Robb is Kirkland Ramsay, Mafud and Matt Grene.

And The Who, too.

Fred



Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)

2006-05-18 Thread Mark Roberts
Norman Baugher wrote:

Join the crowd...what a whack job. I do remember the look on TV's face, at 
GFM, when I introduced myself to him as Brad Dodo - it was rather 
frightening.

Ah yes, one of the classic Norm Baugher incidents!
(I wish I had been there to watch.)



RE: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)

2006-05-18 Thread Bob W
Nice to see that Bruce Rubenstein put in an appearance in that thread too. 

--
Cheers,
 Bob 

 -Original Message-
 From: Aaron Reynolds [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: 18 May 2006 17:57
 To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
 Subject: Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)
 
 OH MY GOD THAT THREAD HAS DEFINITIVE PROOF.
 
 Thank you for sharing it, Joe.
 
 -Aaron
 
 On May 18, 2006, at 12:46 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
 
  Mafud lives! Now dba Ed Greene:
 
  http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00FVwmtag=
 
  Joe
 
 
 
 
 




Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)

2006-05-18 Thread Mark Roberts
Bob W wrote:

If I remember correctly, Mafud and Kirkland Ramsay III
(Presbyterian) where arguing vehemently against each other, with 
Matt (?) Grene providing vociferous support to one of the main 
protagonists. What made it so special
is that all three of them were, in fact, the same person...

Here's my record of Mafud's incarnations:

Suda Mafud 
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Kirkland Ramsey
M. T. Greene
Matt Greene
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Ed
 ([EMAIL PROTECTED])

Note that for the last one he changed his name but forgot to change
the email address associated with it :)

The Listmeister tells me he re-subbed a few more times under different
names but only made one or two posts under each one.



Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)

2006-05-18 Thread Kostas Kavoussanakis

On Thu, 18 May 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Cotty once took on the persona of a lunatic school teacher from 
London, Ontario. He eventually tired of it.


Umm, make a search for 'discombobulation' in:

http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00FVwmtag=

Cotty?

Kostas



Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)

2006-05-18 Thread Mark Roberts
Bob W wrote:

Nice to see that Bruce Rubenstein put in an appearance in that thread too. 

Oh, I'd forgotten about him. Some of my favorite Rubenstein quotes:

Thinking that Pentax will start selling an up to date DSLR, when
they've sold nothing more than simple PS digital cameras, is pure
fantasy.

It isn't that Pentax will use some new lens mount on an
interchangeable DSLR, they aren't going to release an interchangeable
lens DSLR.

They missed their window of opportunity and have passed on making
this type of product. By the time that Pentax would ever start selling
an IL-DSLR, anyone who wanted digital will have been long gone.

I have no idea why anyone seriously thought, as opposed to wished,
that Pentax would sell a DSLR. People who have a need for digital
have, and will, find other solutions.

And this last gem:

I don't expect any major, or long term, effect on the Pentax used
equipment market.

Wonder what he'd pay for my MZ-S now? g



Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)

2006-05-18 Thread John Francis

But nowhere near as well-informed.

Mafud may have been an opinionated loudmouth with absolutely
no tolerance for dissenting opinions, and an extreme ability
to see insults and racial slurs where none was intended, but
he wasn't an ignoramus.


On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 07:11:18PM +0200, Jostein wrote:
 Wow...
 That's every bit as manic as I remember Mafud.
 
 Jostein
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
 Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 6:46 PM
 Subject: Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)
 
 
 Mafud lives! Now dba Ed Greene:
 
 http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00FVwmtag=
 
 Joe
 



Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)

2006-05-18 Thread Tom C
I don't know.  I'd bet money this was the same guy, especially since at one 
point in the thread there was reference to a web gallery by Ed Greene with 
photos in it attributed to Suda Mafud.  And subsequent to that being pointed 
out, the gallery was removed.


He was an ignoramus... at times.

The other option could be that this is Son of Mafud.


Tom C.



From: John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 16:05:46 -0400


But nowhere near as well-informed.

Mafud may have been an opinionated loudmouth with absolutely
no tolerance for dissenting opinions, and an extreme ability
to see insults and racial slurs where none was intended, but
he wasn't an ignoramus.


On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 07:11:18PM +0200, Jostein wrote:
 Wow...
 That's every bit as manic as I remember Mafud.

 Jostein

 - Original Message -
 From: Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
 Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 6:46 PM
 Subject: Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)


 Mafud lives! Now dba Ed Greene:
 
 http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00FVwmtag=
 
 Joe
 






Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)

2006-05-18 Thread Tom C

Mafud lives! Now dba Ed Greene:



Yup.
Pseudo Mafud.
Fer sure.
I wonder if he'd remember me.



William Robb



Do you think this guy actually has a psychopathic/identity problem or does 
he get his kicks this way?



Tom C.




RE: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)

2006-05-18 Thread Bob W
I liked Bruce. He was an ornery old bastard with a great turn of phrase. 

He probably felt crowded out...

--
Cheers,
 Bob 

 -Original Message-
 From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: 18 May 2006 21:03
 To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
 Subject: Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)
 
 Bob W wrote:
 
 Nice to see that Bruce Rubenstein put in an appearance in 
 that thread too. 
 
 Oh, I'd forgotten about him. Some of my favorite Rubenstein quotes:
 
 Thinking that Pentax will start selling an up to date DSLR, 
 when they've sold nothing more than simple PS digital 
 cameras, is pure fantasy.
 
 It isn't that Pentax will use some new lens mount on an 
 interchangeable DSLR, they aren't going to release an 
 interchangeable lens DSLR.
 
 They missed their window of opportunity and have passed on 
 making this type of product. By the time that Pentax would 
 ever start selling an IL-DSLR, anyone who wanted digital will 
 have been long gone.
 
 I have no idea why anyone seriously thought, as opposed to 
 wished, that Pentax would sell a DSLR. People who have a need 
 for digital have, and will, find other solutions.
 
 And this last gem:
 
 I don't expect any major, or long term, effect on the Pentax 
 used equipment market.
 
 Wonder what he'd pay for my MZ-S now? g
 
 
 
 




Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)

2006-05-18 Thread William Robb


- Original Message - 
From: Tom C

Subject: Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)



Mafud lives! Now dba Ed Greene:




Do you think this guy actually has a psychopathic/identity problem or does 
he get his kicks this way?




He told me one time when he was berating me offlist (I probably deserved it) 
that all sorts of authours write under pseudonym.

I believe he mentioned Hemingway specifically.

William Robb 





Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)

2006-05-18 Thread Joseph Tainter

Wow, Wow, Wow!!! Thanks for the laugh!

Tom C.

From: Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)
Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 09:46:44 -0700

Mafud lives! Now dba Ed Greene:

http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00FVwmtag=

Joe

--

Oh, there's more. Get the full name here. Must be a distinguished 
ancestry. Unfortunately the AOL link is dead:


http://www.photo.net/shared/community-member?user_id=44325

But you can sponsor him for a Photo.Net membership.

Joe



OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)

2006-05-17 Thread Bob W
 -Original Message-
 From: Doug Brewer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 
 So that's the next week on this thread, the Reader's Digest 
 Condensed version, without the profanity.
 
 Can we just skip it now?

most of us have been hanging around long enough that we have finally
discussed everything several times, and know each other's opinions about
every subject under the sun. At worst, we can probably predict them just by
going to the same shelf that the rest of them came from. Except for mine,
naturally, because I have rethought everything from first principles and am
therefore right.

Almost. 

I have never contributed to a thread about batteries, so nobody knows my
opinions about batteries. Not even me. Maybe I don't even have one. Opinion,
that is. Obviously I have plenty of batteries.

So, to short-circuit further long, involved and ultimately pointless
threads, somebody needs to trawl the archives and set up a database of
subjects and opinions, cross-referred to people or simply categorized
(pinko, fascist, God-botherer, Satan-worshipping atheist liberal,
philistine, aesthete, cat-lover etc.). 

Doug's hosting software need only scan incoming messages for controversial
content, generate the appropriate war and post it automatically to a
separate archive for all to enjoy - newbies, people with short memories or
who lived through the 60s, unfortunates who stumble across an ancient
controversy in a Google cached page, and so on. Replies would never show up
on the list and nobody would be any the wiser (an increase in wisdom not
being a requirement anyway).

Obviously such a database could only be hosted on Windows, because Macs are
crap for that sort of thing. As any fule kno.

Hope this helps.

Bob
http://www.stcustards.free-online.co.uk/




Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)

2006-05-17 Thread Aaron Reynolds


On May 17, 2006, at 5:43 PM, Bob W wrote:


So, to short-circuit further long, involved and ultimately pointless
threads, somebody needs to trawl the archives and set up a database of
subjects and opinions, cross-referred to people or simply categorized
(pinko, fascist, God-botherer, Satan-worshipping atheist liberal,
philistine, aesthete, cat-lover etc.).


I believe that there was a thread with the wonderful subject line 
Lobbing hand-grenades over the transom.  Perhaps it was Throwing, 
not lobbing.  But the thread title has stuck with me for a number of 
years, at least three -- gotta go look it up.


Anyways, I recall that it was one of the most useless threads in the 
history of the PDML.


-Aaron



Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)

2006-05-17 Thread Rob Studdert
On 17 May 2006 at 17:50, Aaron Reynolds wrote:

 
 On May 17, 2006, at 5:43 PM, Bob W wrote:
 
  So, to short-circuit further long, involved and ultimately pointless
  threads, somebody needs to trawl the archives and set up a database of
  subjects and opinions, cross-referred to people or simply categorized
  (pinko, fascist, God-botherer, Satan-worshipping atheist liberal,
  philistine, aesthete, cat-lover etc.).
 
 I believe that there was a thread with the wonderful subject line 
 Lobbing hand-grenades over the transom.  Perhaps it was Throwing, 
 not lobbing.  But the thread title has stuck with me for a number of 
 years, at least three -- gotta go look it up.

Hand grenades over the transom. Was: A message to the American citizens
Nov 2000

 Anyways, I recall that it was one of the most useless threads in the 
 history of the PDML.

It was a Kirkl*nd R*msey thread and very education from a behavioral 
perspective :-)


Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)  +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http:/home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998



Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)

2006-05-17 Thread Aaron Reynolds
Good sleuthin', Rob!  Plus, I remember it was the tipoff that KR and Mafud were 
one and the same  -- he used the phrase again in January '01.

-Aaron

-Original Message-

It was a Kirkl*nd R*msey thread and very education from a behavioral 
perspective :-)



Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)

2006-05-17 Thread William Robb


- Original Message - 
From: Aaron Reynolds 
Subject: Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)




I believe that there was a thread with the wonderful subject line 
Lobbing hand-grenades over the transom.  Perhaps it was Throwing, 
not lobbing.  But the thread title has stuck with me for a number of 
years, at least three -- gotta go look it up.


I think Mafud was the major contributor to that one.

William Robb



Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)

2006-05-17 Thread Eactivist
In a message dated 5/17/2006 4:21:20 PM Pacific Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 Anyways, I recall that it was one of the most useless threads in the 
 history of the PDML.

It was a Kirkl*nd R*msey thread and very education from a behavioral 
perspective :-)


Rob Studdert
=
Drat. Here I thought the thread I started on Tom Cruise being weird and the 
reason he is weird was due to Scientology was the most useless PDML thread so 
far.

Double drat.

Marnie aka Doe ;-)



Re: OT: Controversial subjects (RE: Zone Alarm (Now OT)

2006-05-17 Thread Eactivist
In a message dated 5/17/2006 2:50:42 PM Pacific Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
most of us have been hanging around long enough that we have finally
discussed everything several times, and know each other's opinions about
every subject under the sun. At worst, we can probably predict them just by
going to the same shelf that the rest of them came from. Except for mine,
naturally, because I have rethought everything from first principles and am
therefore right.

Almost. 

I have never contributed to a thread about batteries, so nobody knows my
opinions about batteries. Not even me. Maybe I don't even have one. Opinion,
that is. Obviously I have plenty of batteries.

So, to short-circuit further long, involved and ultimately pointless
threads, somebody needs to trawl the archives and set up a database of
subjects and opinions, cross-referred to people or simply categorized
(pinko, fascist, God-botherer, Satan-worshipping atheist liberal,
philistine, aesthete, cat-lover etc.). 

Doug's hosting software need only scan incoming messages for controversial
content, generate the appropriate war and post it automatically to a
separate archive for all to enjoy - newbies, people with short memories or
who lived through the 60s, unfortunates who stumble across an ancient
controversy in a Google cached page, and so on. Replies would never show up
on the list and nobody would be any the wiser (an increase in wisdom not
being a requirement anyway).

Obviously such a database could only be hosted on Windows, because Macs are
crap for that sort of thing. As any fule kno.

Hope this helps.

Bob
http://www.stcustards.free-online.co.uk/
=
LOL.

Best laugh I've had all week.

Marnie aka Doe