Re: P30 in 2003?

2003-06-08 Thread Alan Chan
The bright viewfinder was the only thing I missed when I sold the P30t ( 
had
it for some months). And I think the sound of the MZ-M-motor is not more
bothering than the CLACKK of the P30t-shutter.
BTW: Is the viewfinder of the MZ-S brighter than that of the MZ-M (and the
MZ5-N, - I think it's the same)?
I am sure you can evaluate that, Alan, am I right?
I hade the P50 which is the elder brother of the P30. It has brighter and 
better viewfinder than the supposed should be good Super A/Program. 
Personally, I would not consider any MZ/ZX model if you plan to use manual 
focus, except the MZ-S. The reason is that they all have highly distorted, 
low magnification, and difficult to manual focus viewfinders. I believe the 
problem lies at their poor quality uncoated plastic eyepieces which distort 
everything you see. Pentax abandoned the good old multicoated glass 
eyepieces since the Z/PZ & MZ/ZX series, until the MZ-S. For this reason, if 
you want AF body with good viewfinder, MZ-S is your only choice (Z-1p is ok 
too, but ok only). However, at 0.75X magnification, it is still lower than 
the P30 that you had. But it did not seem to be a problem the last time I 
tried it with some manual focus lenses. MX has the highest viewfinder 
magnification, ME/ME Super 2nd. I currently use the MZ-M screen in the MX 
and the viefinder is bight and "big".  :-)

regards,
Alan Chan
_
MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*.  
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus



Re: P30 in 2003?

2003-06-07 Thread Dr E D F Williams
About two years ago I got a brand new P30T from a dealer in LA. He had put
one on eBay and I emailed asking if he had any more. He had and I paid about
$120 I think. Its a fine camera and with a good lens I cannot see how other
cameras can 'run rings' around it? Perhaps you'd be able to find a new one
as well? I like mine and have a slightly older one, a P30, as well. They are
more automatic than any other cameras I've used over the last 50 years or so
and if I had to buy something else it would be an MZ-S. The P30T as you know
is mostly plastic, but I don't find this a problem. I've never broken a
camera and don't intend to start. I did lose one in the sea, but that's
another story.

Don
___
Dr E D F Williams
http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery
Updated: March 30, 2002


- Original Message -
From: "Peter Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 3:09 AM
Subject: Re: P30 in 2003?


> The only 'current' camera made by Pentax that is manual is the ZX-M (US
> designation)
> or MZ-M as it's known in the rest of the world.  It's inexpensive and
> reliable but
> probably doesn't have as nice a view finder as the P30, it's been a long
> time since
> I've handled a P30 so I can't be entirely sure of that.  In all other
> respects the
> ZX/MZ-M runs rings around the P30 as a picture taker.
>
> At 01:58 AM 6/8/03 +0200, you wrote:
> >Hi!
> >
> >I own an old P30t as my main slr camera. I like manual photography; can
> >anybody tell me if there´s another camera now in the market to buy
similar
> >to  the P30? Pentax, if it´s possible. I would like to buy a new one, but
> >manual (I hate AF...). Give me your opinion. Is the P30t "too much old
> >fashioned"? What´s the "actual" P30?
> >
> >Thanks!
>
> Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
>  Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.  --Groucho Marx
>




Re: P30 in 2003?

2003-06-07 Thread Alan Chan
Except the viewfinder. Sorry, can't resist.

regards,
Alan Chan
ZX-M would be the closest current equivalent. Also IMO an
improvement.
_
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online  
http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963



Re: P30 in 2003?

2003-06-07 Thread ernreed2
> Hi!
> 
> I own an old P30t as my main slr camera. I like manual photography; can
> anybody tell me if there´s another camera now in the market to buy similar
> to  the P30? Pentax, if it´s possible. I would like to buy a new one, but
> manual (I hate AF...). Give me your opinion. Is the P30t "too much old
> fashioned"? What´s the "actual" P30?
> 
> Thanks!
> 

ZX-M would be the closest current equivalent. Also IMO an
improvement.



Re: P30 in 2003?

2003-06-07 Thread Peter Alling
The only 'current' camera made by Pentax that is manual is the ZX-M (US 
designation)
or MZ-M as it's known in the rest of the world.  It's inexpensive and 
reliable but
probably doesn't have as nice a view finder as the P30, it's been a long 
time since
I've handled a P30 so I can't be entirely sure of that.  In all other 
respects the
ZX/MZ-M runs rings around the P30 as a picture taker.

At 01:58 AM 6/8/03 +0200, you wrote:
Hi!

I own an old P30t as my main slr camera. I like manual photography; can
anybody tell me if there´s another camera now in the market to buy similar
to  the P30? Pentax, if it´s possible. I would like to buy a new one, but
manual (I hate AF...). Give me your opinion. Is the P30t "too much old
fashioned"? What´s the "actual" P30?
Thanks!
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read.  --Groucho Marx


P30 in 2003?

2003-06-07 Thread Jose Luis Gonzalez Martin
Hi!

I own an old P30t as my main slr camera. I like manual photography; can
anybody tell me if there´s another camera now in the market to buy similar
to  the P30? Pentax, if it´s possible. I would like to buy a new one, but
manual (I hate AF...). Give me your opinion. Is the P30t "too much old
fashioned"? What´s the "actual" P30?

Thanks!