Re: Everything Old is New Again

[ann sanfedele]

check re what Paul said, but as to the sharpness  but all the guys 
looking at ths photo on a little smart phone screen or small Ipad 
probably think it is razor sharp...  The blossoms don't look sharp to me 
on my large screen desktop, but it doesn't matter... I'm thinkin j that  
"the answer friend , are [blossoms] blowin in the wind"


ann

On 4/19/2017 12:34 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:

We’re looking at a low-res image here folks. It’s not really possible to 
determine sharpness based on such feeble evidence.


On Apr 19, 2017, at 12:17 PM, Alan C <c...@lantic.net> wrote:

The twigs on the tree & the shrubs are all look sharp.

Alan C

-Original Message- From: P. J. Alling
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2017 6:07 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Everything Old is New Again

It could be the lens or it could be a phenomenon I and others have
noticed, and that has been commented on in other places, that  sometimes
a digital image will have no zone of absolute sharpness, you did
everything right but there isn't anything in the photo that is actually
in sharp focus.  Shutter speed is high enough lens is stopped down if
not it's optimum at least not to the point where diffraction begins to
really effect the image, but still noting is sharp.

I don't know of any theory that explains this, but it's been noted.  I
probably saved a bookmark to the discussion, but that was a few years
ago, and I've since upgraded everything twice so a lot of things that
didn't seem to be important got lost.


On 4/19/2017 10:25 AM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:

Jay,
When I looked at the photo, "wow!", I was impressed with the colors and the 
composition.

But then I realized that something was bothering my eyes.
At first I thought that the photo was oversharpened. But when I looked closely, 
I realized that the tree flowers are not sharp.
Actually, I am having hard time finding where the focus is. Either it is 
back-focused, or you have a motion blur... (or something is out of whack with 
the lens).
There is also a possibility that it is overcompressed with JPEG processing.

Igor

On Apr 18, 2017, at 11:27 PM, Jay Taylor wrote:

A couple weekends back I made my annual visit to our local historical camera
collectors swap meet in hopes of finding a K version of the SMC 28/3.5. I
wasn't that lucky (I usually find a gem there), but I did find an M 28/2.8
and a K 50/4 Macro. I shot a few images with the 50 on my Sony A7II and was
pleasantly surprised at the quality of this 1970's era lens. Here's one of
the shots taken at Seattle's Washington Park Arboretum.
JayT


https://photos.smugmug.com/Nature/Wildlife/i-85mHthv/0/XL/IMG_5310-XL.jpg




--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.





--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Everything Old is New Again

[John]

On 4/19/2017 00:27, Jay Taylor wrote:

A couple weekends back I made my annual visit to our local
historical camera collectors swap meet in hopes of finding a K
version of the SMC 28/3.5. I wasn't that lucky (I usually find a gem
there), but I did find an M 28/2.8 and a K 50/4 Macro. I shot a few
images with the 50 on my Sony A7II and was pleasantly surprised at
the quality of this 1970's era lens. Here's one of the shots taken at
Seattle's Washington Park Arboretum.
JayT
https://photos.smugmug.com/Nature/Wildlife/i-85mHthv/0/XL/IMG_5310-XL.jpg


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad




I like it!

--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we must never question.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Everything Old is New Again

[John Sessoms]

Do you mean hand tinted postcards? They weren't meant to be false color.


On 4/19/2017 15:39, Gonz wrote:

It looks like one of those false colored post cards from days of yore.
Weird look to it, like its not in focus or something else... Good
composition.


On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 3:42 AM, Christine Aguila  wrote:

Wow!  very pretty, Jay!  Looks like the lens will work out just fine, no?  
Cheers, Christine



On Apr 18, 2017, at 11:27 PM, Jay Taylor  wrote:

A couple weekends back I made my annual visit to our local  historical camera 
collectors swap meet in hopes of finding a K version of the SMC 28/3.5. I 
wasn't that lucky (I usually find a gem there), but I did find an M 28/2.8 and 
a K 50/4 Macro. I shot a few images with the 50 on my Sony A7II and was 
pleasantly surprised at the quality of this 1970's era lens. Here's one of the 
shots taken at Seattle's Washington Park Arboretum.
JayT
https://photos.smugmug.com/Nature/Wildlife/i-85mHthv/0/XL/IMG_5310-XL.jpg


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad



--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Everything Old is New Again

[Gonz]

It looks like one of those false colored post cards from days of yore.
Weird look to it, like its not in focus or something else... Good
composition.


On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 3:42 AM, Christine Aguila  wrote:
> Wow!  very pretty, Jay!  Looks like the lens will work out just fine, no?  
> Cheers, Christine
>
>
>> On Apr 18, 2017, at 11:27 PM, Jay Taylor  wrote:
>>
>> A couple weekends back I made my annual visit to our local  historical 
>> camera collectors swap meet in hopes of finding a K version of the SMC 
>> 28/3.5. I wasn't that lucky (I usually find a gem there), but I did find an 
>> M 28/2.8 and a K 50/4 Macro. I shot a few images with the 50 on my Sony A7II 
>> and was pleasantly surprised at the quality of this 1970's era lens. Here's 
>> one of the shots taken at Seattle's Washington Park Arboretum.
>> JayT
>> https://photos.smugmug.com/Nature/Wildlife/i-85mHthv/0/XL/IMG_5310-XL.jpg
>>
>>
>> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad
>>
>> --
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.



-- 
-- Photography takes an instant out of time, altering life by holding
it still. Dorothea Lange

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Everything Old is New Again

[Jay Taylor]

 blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px 
#715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white 
!important; } Igor,Thanks, now that you mention it I thought the focus point 
was on the trunk, but it's not looking all that sharp to me. I'll have to run 
the lens through some tests to check it, but I did pick it up for a song so 
expectations aren't that high.
JayT 


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPhone


On Wednesday, April 19, 2017, 7:25 AM, Igor PDML-StR  wrote:


Jay,
When I looked at the photo, "wow!", I was impressed with the colors and 
the composition.

But then I realized that something was bothering my eyes.
At first I thought that the photo was oversharpened. But when I looked 
closely, I realized that the tree flowers are not sharp.
Actually, I am having hard time finding where the focus is. Either it is 
back-focused, or you have a motion blur... (or something is out of whack 
with the lens).
There is also a possibility that it is overcompressed with JPEG 
processing.

Igor

On Apr 18, 2017, at 11:27 PM, Jay Taylor wrote:
>
> A couple weekends back I made my annual visit to our local  historical camera
> collectors swap meet in hopes of finding a K version of the SMC 28/3.5. I
> wasn't that lucky (I usually find a gem there), but I did find an M 28/2.8
> and a K 50/4 Macro. I shot a few images with the 50 on my Sony A7II and was
> pleasantly surprised at the quality of this 1970's era lens. Here's one of
> the shots taken at Seattle's Washington Park Arboretum.
> JayT
> 
https://photos.smugmug.com/Nature/Wildlife/i-85mHthv/0/XL/IMG_5310-XL.jpg
>
>

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.



-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Everything Old is New Again

[Paul Stenquist]

We’re looking at a low-res image here folks. It’s not really possible to 
determine sharpness based on such feeble evidence. 

> On Apr 19, 2017, at 12:17 PM, Alan C <c...@lantic.net> wrote:
> 
> The twigs on the tree & the shrubs are all look sharp.
> 
> Alan C
> 
> -Original Message- From: P. J. Alling
> Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2017 6:07 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Everything Old is New Again
> 
> It could be the lens or it could be a phenomenon I and others have
> noticed, and that has been commented on in other places, that  sometimes
> a digital image will have no zone of absolute sharpness, you did
> everything right but there isn't anything in the photo that is actually
> in sharp focus.  Shutter speed is high enough lens is stopped down if
> not it's optimum at least not to the point where diffraction begins to
> really effect the image, but still noting is sharp.
> 
> I don't know of any theory that explains this, but it's been noted.  I
> probably saved a bookmark to the discussion, but that was a few years
> ago, and I've since upgraded everything twice so a lot of things that
> didn't seem to be important got lost.
> 
> 
> On 4/19/2017 10:25 AM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>> 
>> Jay,
>> When I looked at the photo, "wow!", I was impressed with the colors and the 
>> composition.
>> 
>> But then I realized that something was bothering my eyes.
>> At first I thought that the photo was oversharpened. But when I looked 
>> closely, I realized that the tree flowers are not sharp.
>> Actually, I am having hard time finding where the focus is. Either it is 
>> back-focused, or you have a motion blur... (or something is out of whack 
>> with the lens).
>> There is also a possibility that it is overcompressed with JPEG processing.
>> 
>> Igor
>> 
>> On Apr 18, 2017, at 11:27 PM, Jay Taylor wrote:
>>> 
>>> A couple weekends back I made my annual visit to our local historical camera
>>> collectors swap meet in hopes of finding a K version of the SMC 28/3.5. I
>>> wasn't that lucky (I usually find a gem there), but I did find an M 28/2.8
>>> and a K 50/4 Macro. I shot a few images with the 50 on my Sony A7II and was
>>> pleasantly surprised at the quality of this 1970's era lens. Here's one of
>>> the shots taken at Seattle's Washington Park Arboretum.
>>> JayT
>>> 
>> https://photos.smugmug.com/Nature/Wildlife/i-85mHthv/0/XL/IMG_5310-XL.jpg
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions. 
> 
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Everything Old is New Again

[Alan C]

The twigs on the tree & the shrubs are all look sharp.

Alan C

-Original Message- 
From: P. J. Alling

Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2017 6:07 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Everything Old is New Again

It could be the lens or it could be a phenomenon I and others have
noticed, and that has been commented on in other places, that  sometimes
a digital image will have no zone of absolute sharpness, you did
everything right but there isn't anything in the photo that is actually
in sharp focus.  Shutter speed is high enough lens is stopped down if
not it's optimum at least not to the point where diffraction begins to
really effect the image, but still noting is sharp.

I don't know of any theory that explains this, but it's been noted.  I
probably saved a bookmark to the discussion, but that was a few years
ago, and I've since upgraded everything twice so a lot of things that
didn't seem to be important got lost.


On 4/19/2017 10:25 AM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:


Jay,
When I looked at the photo, "wow!", I was impressed with the colors and 
the composition.


But then I realized that something was bothering my eyes.
At first I thought that the photo was oversharpened. But when I looked 
closely, I realized that the tree flowers are not sharp.
Actually, I am having hard time finding where the focus is. Either it is 
back-focused, or you have a motion blur... (or something is out of whack 
with the lens).
There is also a possibility that it is overcompressed with JPEG 
processing.


Igor

On Apr 18, 2017, at 11:27 PM, Jay Taylor wrote:


A couple weekends back I made my annual visit to our local historical 
camera

collectors swap meet in hopes of finding a K version of the SMC 28/3.5. I
wasn't that lucky (I usually find a gem there), but I did find an M 
28/2.8
and a K 50/4 Macro. I shot a few images with the 50 on my Sony A7II and 
was
pleasantly surprised at the quality of this 1970's era lens. Here's one 
of

the shots taken at Seattle's Washington Park Arboretum.
JayT


https://photos.smugmug.com/Nature/Wildlife/i-85mHthv/0/XL/IMG_5310-XL.jpg








--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions. 



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Everything Old is New Again

[P. J. Alling]

It could be the lens or it could be a phenomenon I and others have 
noticed, and that has been commented on in other places, that  sometimes 
a digital image will have no zone of absolute sharpness, you did 
everything right but there isn't anything in the photo that is actually 
in sharp focus.  Shutter speed is high enough lens is stopped down if 
not it's optimum at least not to the point where diffraction begins to 
really effect the image, but still noting is sharp.


I don't know of any theory that explains this, but it's been noted.  I 
probably saved a bookmark to the discussion, but that was a few years 
ago, and I've since upgraded everything twice so a lot of things that 
didn't seem to be important got lost.



On 4/19/2017 10:25 AM, Igor PDML-StR wrote:


Jay,
When I looked at the photo, "wow!", I was impressed with the colors 
and the composition.


But then I realized that something was bothering my eyes.
At first I thought that the photo was oversharpened. But when I looked 
closely, I realized that the tree flowers are not sharp.
Actually, I am having hard time finding where the focus is. Either it 
is back-focused, or you have a motion blur... (or something is out of 
whack with the lens).
There is also a possibility that it is overcompressed with JPEG 
processing.


Igor

On Apr 18, 2017, at 11:27 PM, Jay Taylor wrote:


A couple weekends back I made my annual visit to our local historical 
camera
collectors swap meet in hopes of finding a K version of the SMC 
28/3.5. I
wasn't that lucky (I usually find a gem there), but I did find an M 
28/2.8
and a K 50/4 Macro. I shot a few images with the 50 on my Sony A7II 
and was
pleasantly surprised at the quality of this 1970's era lens. Here's 
one of

the shots taken at Seattle's Washington Park Arboretum.
JayT


https://photos.smugmug.com/Nature/Wildlife/i-85mHthv/0/XL/IMG_5310-XL.jpg








--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Everything Old is New Again

[Igor PDML-StR]

Jay,
When I looked at the photo, "wow!", I was impressed with the colors and 
the composition.


But then I realized that something was bothering my eyes.
At first I thought that the photo was oversharpened. But when I looked 
closely, I realized that the tree flowers are not sharp.
Actually, I am having hard time finding where the focus is. Either it is 
back-focused, or you have a motion blur... (or something is out of whack 
with the lens).
There is also a possibility that it is overcompressed with JPEG 
processing.


Igor

On Apr 18, 2017, at 11:27 PM, Jay Taylor wrote:


A couple weekends back I made my annual visit to our local  historical camera
collectors swap meet in hopes of finding a K version of the SMC 28/3.5. I
wasn't that lucky (I usually find a gem there), but I did find an M 28/2.8
and a K 50/4 Macro. I shot a few images with the 50 on my Sony A7II and was
pleasantly surprised at the quality of this 1970's era lens. Here's one of
the shots taken at Seattle's Washington Park Arboretum.
JayT


https://photos.smugmug.com/Nature/Wildlife/i-85mHthv/0/XL/IMG_5310-XL.jpg





--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Everything Old is New Again

[Alan C]

It sure is. Very appealing.

Alan C


-Original Message- 
From: Jay Taylor

Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2017 6:27 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Everything Old is New Again

A couple weekends back I made my annual visit to our local  historical 
camera collectors swap meet in hopes of finding a K version of the SMC 
28/3.5. I wasn't that lucky (I usually find a gem there), but I did find an 
M 28/2.8 and a K 50/4 Macro. I shot a few images with the 50 on my Sony A7II 
and was pleasantly surprised at the quality of this 1970's era lens. Here's 
one of the shots taken at Seattle's Washington Park Arboretum.

JayT
https://photos.smugmug.com/Nature/Wildlife/i-85mHthv/0/XL/IMG_5310-XL.jpg


Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
follow the directions. 



---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Everything Old is New Again

[Jack Davis]

Tack sharp, beautiful scene, Jay!

J

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 19, 2017, at 1:42 AM, Christine Aguila  wrote:
> 
> Wow!  very pretty, Jay!  Looks like the lens will work out just fine, no?  
> Cheers, Christine
> 
> 
>> On Apr 18, 2017, at 11:27 PM, Jay Taylor  wrote:
>> 
>> A couple weekends back I made my annual visit to our local  historical 
>> camera collectors swap meet in hopes of finding a K version of the SMC 
>> 28/3.5. I wasn't that lucky (I usually find a gem there), but I did find an 
>> M 28/2.8 and a K 50/4 Macro. I shot a few images with the 50 on my Sony A7II 
>> and was pleasantly surprised at the quality of this 1970's era lens. Here's 
>> one of the shots taken at Seattle's Washington Park Arboretum.
>> JayT
>> https://photos.smugmug.com/Nature/Wildlife/i-85mHthv/0/XL/IMG_5310-XL.jpg
>> 
>> 
>> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad
>> 
>> -- 
>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML@pdml.net
>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and 
>> follow the directions.
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Everything Old is New Again

[Daniel J. Matyola]

Very nice indeed!

Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola

On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 4:42 AM, Christine Aguila 
wrote:

> Wow!  very pretty, Jay!  Looks like the lens will work out just fine, no?
> Cheers, Christine
>
>
> > On Apr 18, 2017, at 11:27 PM, Jay Taylor  wrote:
> >
> > A couple weekends back I made my annual visit to our local  historical
> camera collectors swap meet in hopes of finding a K version of the SMC
> 28/3.5. I wasn't that lucky (I usually find a gem there), but I did find an
> M 28/2.8 and a K 50/4 Macro. I shot a few images with the 50 on my Sony
> A7II and was pleasantly surprised at the quality of this 1970's era lens.
> Here's one of the shots taken at Seattle's Washington Park Arboretum.
> > JayT
> > https://photos.smugmug.com/Nature/Wildlife/i-85mHthv/0/
> XL/IMG_5310-XL.jpg
> >
> >
> > Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad
> >
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > PDML@pdml.net
> > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>
-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Re: Everything Old is New Again

[Christine Aguila]

Wow!  very pretty, Jay!  Looks like the lens will work out just fine, no?  
Cheers, Christine


> On Apr 18, 2017, at 11:27 PM, Jay Taylor  wrote:
> 
> A couple weekends back I made my annual visit to our local  historical camera 
> collectors swap meet in hopes of finding a K version of the SMC 28/3.5. I 
> wasn't that lucky (I usually find a gem there), but I did find an M 28/2.8 
> and a K 50/4 Macro. I shot a few images with the 50 on my Sony A7II and was 
> pleasantly surprised at the quality of this 1970's era lens. Here's one of 
> the shots taken at Seattle's Washington Park Arboretum.
> JayT
> https://photos.smugmug.com/Nature/Wildlife/i-85mHthv/0/XL/IMG_5310-XL.jpg
> 
> 
> Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.