Re: June Commentary: Eduardo Carone Costa Junior

2001-06-12 Thread PAUL STENQUIST


Eduardo Carone Costa Júnior wrote:
 
 Paul,
 
 
 Thanks again for taking the time to comment my PUG submission ...
 Best regards,
Eduardo.
 

You're quite welcome. Shooting a symmetrical photo of a complicated
pattern is quite difficult. Critiquing one is easy.
Paul
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .




Re: June Commentary: Eduardo Carone Costa Junior

2001-06-09 Thread PAUL STENQUIST

My suggestion to crop was only intended to correct the symmetry of the
two sides. If you look at the photo, you'll see the two arch shapes on
each side are almost identical. However, the area on the right is
slightly wider and its midpoint appears to be just a slight amount
lower. If you were to rotate the picture one degree or maybe even just
half a degree counterclockwise (in Photoshop) and then crop just a
slight amount to make the two arches equal, it would be perfectly
symmetrical. This isn't critical, but to my eye, something that is
almost symmetrical seems to beg for perfection. Again, it's only my
subjective opinion.
Paul

Eduardo Carone Costa Júnior wrote:
 
 PAUL STENQUIST wrote:
  Eduardo Carone Costa Junior: Orange Dome
  I found this image quite compelling. I like the geometric patterns and
  the symmetry. The pattern displayed on the dome interior is interesting.
  It seems to suggest a sun or even a Sun God. It resembles some Mayan
  images I've seen.
 I'm not surprised that Eduardo had trouble scanning this photo. The
  extreme highlights in the windows combined with the subtle lighting of
  the interior surfaces make for a difficult situation for both film and
  scanner. One window highlight has burned out a section of the interior
  surface at the lower left. I might have patched that small area in
  PhotoShop, although I realize that some would consider that excessive
  tampering. I might also have cropped the image just a tiny bit and
  rotated it a degree or so to perfect the symmetry. Nevertheless, a very
  nice photograph.
 
 Thank you for your kind words.
 As I mentioned some days ago, I'm less than pleased with that photo. When
 taking it, I was confronted with the K series metering inability to cope
 with fast film and long exposures --- I only discovered what was happening
 later, here at the PDML, reading some posts about this topic... If that were
 not enough, I also had some difficulties trying to scan it to my old flatbed
 scanner and compressing it to comply with PUG rules. I hope I can do better,
 next time I get the chance to photograph the interior of that church...
 The orange color was actually caused by a second row of windows at the inner
 part of the dome... I assume they are made from colored glass.
 I wonder if you could explain why do you think a little more cropping would
 be better? I'm just curious and would like to learn  something more about
 cropping, because, sometimes, I have difficulty when deciding how much
 cropping is ok :-)
 Thanks again,
 Eduardo.
 
 -
 This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
 go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
 visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .