The Big Issue (was Re: Doomsday is coming upon us?)

2006-12-26 Thread Jostein Øksne
Malcolm Smith wrote:
 [...]
 What we
 all need to do is agree there is a problem and how best to resolve it for
 everyone; although I suspect the 'facts' issued by governments helps to
 distract the various populations and allow themselves and big business
 largely get on with doing what it has always done, with mere lip service to
 the big issue.

The Big Issue is really the big gap in logic between:
1. granting all the world the same level of living standard as the
first world countries, and
2. continuing the economic growth in the first world countries

An economic model to accomodate both does not exist.

Jostein

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: The Big Issue (was Re: Doomsday is coming upon us?)

2006-12-26 Thread Boris Liberman
Well,

 The Big Issue is really the big gap in logic between:
 1. granting all the world the same level of living standard as the
 first world countries, and
 2. continuing the economic growth in the first world countries

 An economic model to accomodate both does not exist.

Logically you're quite right, Jostein. But we deal with politics here,
right? Politics has different logics than plain common sense.



-- 
Boris

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: The Big Issue (was Re: Doomsday is coming upon us?)

2006-12-26 Thread Jostein Øksne
Boris Liberman wrote:

  An economic model to accomodate both does not exist.

 Logically you're quite right, Jostein. But we deal with politics here,
 right? Politics has different logics than plain common sense.

So has economic theory, IMVHO. :-)

Jostein

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: The Big Issue (was Re: Doomsday is coming upon us?)

2006-12-26 Thread SJ
On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 16:55:14 +0100
Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The Big Issue is really the big gap in logic between:
 1. granting all the world the same level of living standard as the
 first world countries, and

jostein, much as i agree with most of your logic, i feel the need to
butt in with the fact that 'living standard' does not necessarily
equate to 'living happily' and that 'first world' is, in spite of the
pompousness of the wording, by no means, an ideal...

regards, subash

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: The Big Issue (was Re: Doomsday is coming upon us?)

2006-12-26 Thread Jostein Øksne
Thanks Subash!

I used those terms specifically for their loaded content. :-)

And you're absolutely right, of course.

Jostein


On 12/26/06, SJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 16:55:14 +0100
 Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  The Big Issue is really the big gap in logic between:
  1. granting all the world the same level of living standard as the
  first world countries, and

 jostein, much as i agree with most of your logic, i feel the need to
 butt in with the fact that 'living standard' does not necessarily
 equate to 'living happily' and that 'first world' is, in spite of the
 pompousness of the wording, by no means, an ideal...

 regards, subash

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: The Big Issue (was Re: Doomsday is coming upon us?)

2006-12-26 Thread Adam Maas
Jostein Øksne wrote:
 Malcolm Smith wrote:
 [...]
 What we
 all need to do is agree there is a problem and how best to resolve it for
 everyone; although I suspect the 'facts' issued by governments helps to
 distract the various populations and allow themselves and big business
 largely get on with doing what it has always done, with mere lip service to
 the big issue.
 
 The Big Issue is really the big gap in logic between:
 1. granting all the world the same level of living standard as the
 first world countries, and
 2. continuing the economic growth in the first world countries
 
 An economic model to accomodate both does not exist.
 
 Jostein
 

Actually one does. However it requires that we not look at earth's 
resources as the only ones available to us but rather to look to the 
entire solar system. The global economy is not a zero-sum game.

It's raining soup out there and we're stuck in our tent.

-Adam

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: The Big Issue (was Re: Doomsday is coming upon us?)

2006-12-26 Thread Bob Sullivan
Jostein and Subash,
Of course you are right.
Living standards do not have to follow resource consumption or happy living.
The traditional issues with living standards are life span and infant mortality.
In other words, having enough resources to avoid death and disease.
In my book, this is having a higher/happier standard of living.
Regards,  Bob S.

On 12/26/06, Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Thanks Subash!

 I used those terms specifically for their loaded content. :-)

 And you're absolutely right, of course.

 Jostein


 On 12/26/06, SJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Tue, 26 Dec 2006 16:55:14 +0100
  Jostein Øksne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   The Big Issue is really the big gap in logic between:
   1. granting all the world the same level of living standard as the
   first world countries, and
 
  jostein, much as i agree with most of your logic, i feel the need to
  butt in with the fact that 'living standard' does not necessarily
  equate to 'living happily' and that 'first world' is, in spite of the
  pompousness of the wording, by no means, an ideal...
 
  regards, subash
 
  --
  PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
  PDML@pdml.net
  http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
 

 --
 PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
 PDML@pdml.net
 http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


Re: The Big Issue (was Re: Doomsday is coming upon us?)

2006-12-26 Thread David Mann
On Dec 27, 2006, at 7:06 AM, SJ wrote:

 jostein, much as i agree with most of your logic, i feel the need to
 butt in with the fact that 'living standard' does not necessarily
 equate to 'living happily' and that 'first world' is, in spite of the
 pompousness of the wording, by no means, an ideal...

I once saw a B.C. cartoon where a caveman was playing poker with  
some monkeys.  The caveman was saying something like:
OK, whoever wins get to spend their lives lazing around in trees  
eating bananas all day, while the losers have to spend their days  
working to support their society.

I need to find it again so I can put a large copy on my wall :)

- Dave


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net