Re: fine art print sizes without cropping (RE: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body
I've found a source for Ilford Galerie Smooth Gloss for about 25% less than I can get it anywhere on line. I print to fit that and find frames and mats to match. But then I'm a Yankee, (read cheap). Aaron Reynolds wrote: On Aug 16, 2006, at 2:47 PM, Adam Maas wrote: Cropping the image to the paper allows use of standard frame sizes with even matting on every edge. Of course, you could always buy frames in different shapes. At Ikea, they have a lot of odd (to North America) Euro sizes -- print to those! -Aaron -- When you're worried or in doubt, Run in circles, (scream and shout). -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: fine art print sizes without cropping (RE: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body
On Aug 18, 2006, at 3:35 AM, Cotty wrote: I have done this from my first days with inkjet. I bought a Dahl rotary trimmer (cuts up to A3) for fifty quid in 1999 and haven't looked back. One of the best investments I ever made - and still going strong on the original blade! I print on roll paper. The printer's auto-trimmer attachment takes care of the cutting. It is a pain having to de-curl the paper, but that's something I can live with. - Dave (it's about time I printed some more pans) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: fine art print sizes without cropping (RE: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body
On 16/8/06, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed: I've never understood this, so maybe somebody could enlighten me. What makes people think they have to crop the image to fit the paper? To my mind it's a brain-upside-down way of thinking, but I've heard and read it so often that perhaps it's me that's got something wrong. Cut the paper to fit the image! I have done this from my first days with inkjet. I bought a Dahl rotary trimmer (cuts up to A3) for fifty quid in 1999 and haven't looked back. One of the best investments I ever made - and still going strong on the original blade! I always crop and chop. -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: fine art print sizes without cropping (RE: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body
George Eastman seems to have agreed with you, at least his first roll-film camera shot round images. -- graywolf http://www.graywolfphoto.com http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf Idiot Proof == Expert Proof --- David Mann wrote: On Aug 17, 2006, at 9:50 AM, graywolf wrote: Next you will be saying it is OK to shoot square images, or something. I think we should all shoot round images, to take full advantage of the lens image circle. - Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
fine art print sizes without cropping (RE: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body
I've never understood this, so maybe somebody could enlighten me. What makes people think they have to crop the image to fit the paper? To my mind it's a brain-upside-down way of thinking, but I've heard and read it so often that perhaps it's me that's got something wrong. Cut the paper to fit the image! -- Cheers, Bob -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Stringer Sent: 16 August 2006 12:46 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body 6x7 format translates to fine art print sizes without cropping. In camera mask would make composing in a ratio similar to 6x7 easier and as I said earlier, an easy to use hyperfocal adjustment for foreground sharpness would be nice. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: fine art print sizes without cropping (RE: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body
Cropping the image to the paper allows use of standard frame sizes with even matting on every edge. -Adam Bob W wrote: I've never understood this, so maybe somebody could enlighten me. What makes people think they have to crop the image to fit the paper? To my mind it's a brain-upside-down way of thinking, but I've heard and read it so often that perhaps it's me that's got something wrong. Cut the paper to fit the image! -- Cheers, Bob -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Stringer Sent: 16 August 2006 12:46 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body 6x7 format translates to fine art print sizes without cropping. In camera mask would make composing in a ratio similar to 6x7 easier and as I said earlier, an easy to use hyperfocal adjustment for foreground sharpness would be nice. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: fine art print sizes without cropping (RE: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body
On Aug 16, 2006, at 2:38 PM, Bob W wrote: To my mind it's a brain-upside-down way of thinking, but I've heard and read it so often that perhaps it's me that's got something wrong. Cut the paper to fit the image! It's upside down to me, too. -Aaron -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: fine art print sizes without cropping (RE: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body
On Aug 16, 2006, at 2:47 PM, Adam Maas wrote: Cropping the image to the paper allows use of standard frame sizes with even matting on every edge. Of course, you could always buy frames in different shapes. At Ikea, they have a lot of odd (to North America) Euro sizes -- print to those! -Aaron -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: fine art print sizes without cropping (RE: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body
Man, you got something against standardization? Next you will be saying it is OK to shoot square images, or something. If God had meant for us to produce anything but 4x6 prints he would not have invented the minilab. -- graywolf http://www.graywolfphoto.com http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf Idiot Proof == Expert Proof --- Aaron Reynolds wrote: On Aug 16, 2006, at 2:38 PM, Bob W wrote: To my mind it's a brain-upside-down way of thinking, but I've heard and read it so often that perhaps it's me that's got something wrong. Cut the paper to fit the image! It's upside down to me, too. -Aaron -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
: Re: fine art print sizes without cropping (RE: Holy Crap --Pentax 10MP body
If God had meant for us to produce anything but 4x6 prints he would not have invented the minilab. -- graywolf MARK!!! Butch -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Re: fine art print sizes without cropping (RE: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body
On Aug 17, 2006, at 9:50 AM, graywolf wrote: Next you will be saying it is OK to shoot square images, or something. I think we should all shoot round images, to take full advantage of the lens image circle. - Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
