Re: raw conversion (was Undersharpening)

2003-11-06 Thread Christian Skofteland
I just got a reply from a question posed to Pentax USA regarding photo-lab:

"There may be a Photoshop RAW file plugin released with a future firmware
update to the camera. There has been talk of this, but I don't have a
definitive timeframe on that. Perhaps Q1 next year..."

Pretty vague, but it sounds like they are working on it

Christian Skofteland
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


- Original Message - 
From: "Herb Chong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 8:55 PM
Subject: Re: raw conversion (was Undersharpening)


> reading the bits and producing a recognizable image isn't enough. it has
to
> be tagged with and processed with the right profiles. since Pentax hasn't
> published the file format, it's hard to tell what nonlinearities the
Pentax
> software corrects for yet. comparing the bits between TIFF16 and what
dcRaw
> puts out isn't worth my time.
>
> Herb
> - Original Message - 
> From: "danilo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 11:05 AM
> Subject: raw conversion (was Undersharpening)
>
>
> > good news for all you linux users here:
> >
> > http://www.cybercom.net/~dcoffin/
> >
> > you can find a free-software generic raw converter which fits a lot of
> digital
> > camera's raw format, used also in many commercial product (see web page
> for
> > details).
> > This guy have done a good work.
>
>



Re: raw conversion (was Undersharpening)

2003-11-06 Thread Herb Chong
reading the bits and producing a recognizable image isn't enough. it has to
be tagged with and processed with the right profiles. since Pentax hasn't
published the file format, it's hard to tell what nonlinearities the Pentax
software corrects for yet. comparing the bits between TIFF16 and what dcRaw
puts out isn't worth my time.

Herb
- Original Message - 
From: "danilo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 11:05 AM
Subject: raw conversion (was Undersharpening)


> good news for all you linux users here:
>
> http://www.cybercom.net/~dcoffin/
>
> you can find a free-software generic raw converter which fits a lot of
digital
> camera's raw format, used also in many commercial product (see web page
for
> details).
> This guy have done a good work.




Re: raw conversion (was Undersharpening)

2003-11-06 Thread edwin
> btw, how many of you use linux for graphic manipulation issues?

Some of the time, for most of my personal work.  I use Linux at home 
all the time unless I need a particular non-linux program.

For pro pre-press use photoshop is still much better  (even older 
versions) but Gimp is catching up quick.  I've got a great new mac G4
with PS7 at work which has pretty much stopped me using the older mac with 
PS5.5 that I have on loan from my mother for mac-compatible work-related 
use.

I've also got PS3 for windoze running under WinMe and 3.11, and Gimp for 
windoze running under WinMe, but I haven't used either in at least a year 
since I only boot to windoze for games.

DJE




Re: raw conversion (was Undersharpening)

2003-11-06 Thread Christian

- Original Message - 
From: "danilo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> btw, how many of you use linux for graphic manipulation issues?
>
>
> ciao
> Danilo.
>

I use the Gimp on Linux or Photoshop on Windows depending on my mood and
where I am.

Christian



Re: raw conversion (was Undersharpening)

2003-11-06 Thread Chris Murray
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, danilo wrote:

> 
> btw, how many of you use linux for graphic manipulation issues?
> 
> 
> ciao
> Danilo.
> 

I only seem to use Linux or OpenBSD these days...

I use the Gimp (www.gimp.org) for image manipulation, and X-Sane to do my
scanning. I also use imagemagick (www.imagemagick.com) to batch resize my
images. 

- Chris

--
Chris Murray   /"\   
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
http://apeman.org/  XAGAINST HTML MAIL 
Cell: 604.861.8307 / \/

Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html



raw conversion (was Undersharpening)

2003-11-06 Thread danilo
Alle 14:32, giovedì 6 novembre 2003, Keith Whaley ha scritto:
> Herb Chong wrote:
> > nothing reads Pentax RAW format except Pentax software, yet. i'm not
> > holding my breath.
>
> I believe GraphicConverter will.
>
> http://www.lemkesoft.de/en/index.htm
>
good news for all you linux users here:

http://www.cybercom.net/~dcoffin/ 

you can find a free-software generic raw converter which fits a lot of digital 
camera's raw format, used also in many commercial product (see web page for 
details).
This guy have done a good work.

he says it works even in MS windows and Mac, but I haven't tried it (and I'm 
not going to do it). I've tried the linux version, as a plug-in for the GIMP 
(another great piece of free software, the GNU Image Manipulation Software 
www.gimp.org, all of you who think photoshop is a bit expensive can download 
and use it, it's free (both as freedom and free-beer) and it is for linux, 
windows, and some other UNIX-based system), and it works very well with canon 
eos300d raw files. 

btw, how many of you use linux for graphic manipulation issues?


ciao
Danilo.