Re: [Pdns-users] Pramod Bodla wants to stay in touch on LinkedIn

2010-12-22 Thread bert hubert
Please everybody do not respond ;-) 

On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 04:49:11AM +, Pramod Bodla wrote:
 LinkedIn
 
 

 I'd like to add you to my professional network on LinkedIn.
 
 - Pramod Bodla
 
 Pramod Bodla
 Senior Soft ware Engineer at Kodiak Networks 
 Bengaluru Area, India
 
 Confirm that you know Pramod Bodla
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users


Re: [Pdns-users] Recursor / pdns installation help

2010-12-22 Thread Patrick Coffin
Leen,

Hopefully a few last questions and I will attempt to keep it brief.  I am just 
having confusion on how to get the recursor servers to lookup from pdns with my 
configuration.  I get that being authoritative for a domain will initiate a 
lookup to the defined dns server.  How do I get a lookup and not expose the 
pdns software to the net and get the answers through recursor.

Currently this is my setup:

Each of my dns servers runs pdns and each has a slave copy of the master pdns 
mysql database and in turn each server looks up the dns locally via mysql.  
This has been working great for 2 years.

The problem each server is running pdns which has a DOS vulnerability. which is 
why I am upgrading to implement recursor.
ns1@mydomain.com - on server 1
n...@mydomain.com - on server 2
n...@mydomain.com - on server 3
n...@mydomain.com - on server 4

Also for testing I have ns5 setup on a new server running both pdns(5300) and 
recursor (53).  The pdns software from my research and security testing still 
has the DOS issue.  So when recursor is on ns5 responding to port 53 requests 
it passes the security testing.


New Setup question:

My plan is to install recursor on each of the ns1,ns2,ns3, and ns4 servers and 
then install pdns onto the fifth server (currently ns5).  Should pdns on each 
be responding to port 53 requests only from ns1-4 on port 53?  In doing this 
then I only have one databases connection supporting the ns1-4 servers and now 
do not need the mysql slaves on each server.  Currently all my hosting domains 
are pointing to ns1-4.

So does each server ns1-4 need a forward definition to lookup on the ns5 pdns 
server to get the authoritative response?

I was hoping to keep the data local to each server. Since I set it up 
originally this way the dns servers have been running great.  I am attempting 
to avoid a single point of failure with my setup.

Thanks in advance.  Like I said previously I think I am just missing a piece of 
the pie to get it all together.

Patrick




On Dec 22, 2010, at 3:00 AM, pdns-users-requ...@mailman.powerdns.com wrote:

 From: Leen Besselink l...@consolejunkie.net
 Subject: Re: [Pdns-users] Recursor / pdns installation help
 To: pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
 Message-ID: 4d1145f4.1080...@consolejunkie.net
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
 
 On 12/21/2010 09:09 PM, Patrick Coffin wrote:
 Leen,
 
 Thanks for the reply.  We are hosting 1000's of dns records so
 entering them in the forwards is not at option.
 
 I will take your advise to split the pdns and recursor to separate
 servers.
 
 Should I expect that if I move the pdns to a separate server that the
 looks up will work correctly with the information I have given?  I
 would move pdns back to port 53 and keep it connected to mysql for
 lookups.
 
 I would like it to be setup that recursor queries the pdns server and
 database if we are authoritative for the domain. Otherwise recursor
 should looks to the authoritative server for the answer.
 
 
 If the pdns server is authoritive for the domain, every recursor in the
 world will look at your pdns server when it want to ask about that
 domain. Because the root and TLD will point them to your pdns server.
 
 Thus so will your own recursor.
 
 I suggest you set up a few domains in your recursor to point to your
 pdns for the domains. The few domains you use internally (don't forget
 your reverse DNS blocks).
 
 Just in case you lose connectivity to the outside world and the external
 root/TLD-servers can't be reached.
 
 Is there another resource that I can reference for this setup?  I
 believe I am just missing one or two pieces to get it working properly.
 
 
 Well, I hope the above makes sense to you. Atleast if that is the setup
 you want then it should not need any other configuration then what I
 mentioned above.
 
 I appreciate the help!
 
 Thanks,
 Patrick
 
 
 

___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users


[Pdns-users] Internal PowerDNS Install?

2010-12-22 Thread IFM Lists
This may be more of a general DNS question, if so forgive me. I'm somewhat a 
DNS in many ways. (Software engineer, sysadmin when my arm is twisted.) 

I've been using PDNS for providing DNS services for publicly-available names 
for a couple years now. Flawless and Easy. 

I wish to set up a PDNS server in-house to serve additional names. For example:

www.mydomain.com - current external PDNS instance
mail.mydomain.com - current external PDNS instance

foo.mydomain.com - available in-house only
bar.mydomain.com - available in-house only

What would be even better if internally it could resolve the internal IP of www 
and mail rather than going through the external firewall. 

Is this doable? What is this called, so I can re-read the relevant part of the 
docs? 

Thanks

___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users


Re: [Pdns-users] Internal PowerDNS Install?

2010-12-22 Thread Mark Felder
In BIND this would be setting up different views, but I haven't seen  
that available in PowerDNS yet. Anyone have comments on whether or not  
this is coming or just not in the roadmap?



Regards,


Mark
___
Pdns-users mailing list
Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com
http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users