Re: [Pdns-users] PowerDNS needs your thoughts on two important DNSSEC matters
Hello, On Sep 4, 2012, at 20:50 , Peter van Dijk wrote: 2. ALTER TABLE records ADD order name VARCHAR(255) BINARY Then you don't care about the CHARSET used by the server. This syntax always set the binary collation specific for that charset This is a good tip I did not know about. I will look into this. The downside of VARBINARY is that queries also become case-sensitive, which is acceptable for PowerDNS but makes debugging harder. Thanks! This works just as well as VARBINARY, indeed. Sadly, it does also make queries case-sensitive. If anyone has a suggestion that avoids case-sensitivity, please let us know. Otherwise we will go with VARCHAR BINARY. Thanks! Kind regards, -- Peter van Dijk Netherlabs Computer Consulting BV - http://www.netherlabs.nl/ ___ Pdns-users mailing list Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
Re: [Pdns-users] publish SPF and TXT records?
* Marc van de Geijn m...@bhosted.nl [2012-09-05 16:14 (+)]: According to rfc's the dns server should publish both spf and txt. We now create the spf, but not the txt version of the same spf. Hi Marc, Just take into consideration the ongoing IETF discussion about obsoleting SPF RR. 12.1. The SPF DNS Record Type Per [RFC4408], the IANA assigned the Resource Record Type and Qtype from the DNS Parameters Registry for the SPF RR type with code 99. The format of this type is identical to the TXT RR [RFC1035]. The character content of the record is encoded as [US-ASCII]. Use of this record type is obsolete for SPF Version 1. IANA is requested to add an annotation to the SPF RRTYPE saying (OBSOLETE - use TXT) in the DNS Parameters registry. [NOTE TO RFC EDITOR: (to be changed to ... has added ... upon publication)] This is taken from the latest draft: https://tools.ietf.org/wg/spfbis/draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis/draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-06-from-05.wdiff.html just my 2ct -arsen ___ Pdns-users mailing list Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
Re: [Pdns-users] publish SPF and TXT records?
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 02:35:13PM +, Marc van de Geijn wrote: Thanks, Arsen, for this information. Are there any statistics on the number of mailservers/... requesting SPF records instead of TXT records? I know some of the software on our mailservers doesn't even try SPF. isc.org and ietf.org do publish both, but they seem to be the exception. hotmail.com , gmail.com , sendmail.com and many others only have TXT and no SPF. -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: Arsen STASIC [mailto:arsen.sta...@univie.ac.at] Verzonden: donderdag 6 september 2012 16:15 Aan: Marc van de Geijn CC: Peter van Dijk; pdns-users Users Onderwerp: Re: [Pdns-users] publish SPF and TXT records? * Marc van de Geijn m...@bhosted.nl [2012-09-05 16:14 (+)]: According to rfc's the dns server should publish both spf and txt. We now create the spf, but not the txt version of the same spf. Hi Marc, Just take into consideration the ongoing IETF discussion about obsoleting SPF RR. 12.1. The SPF DNS Record Type Per [RFC4408], the IANA assigned the Resource Record Type and Qtype from the DNS Parameters Registry for the SPF RR type with code 99. The format of this type is identical to the TXT RR [RFC1035]. The character content of the record is encoded as [US-ASCII]. Use of this record type is obsolete for SPF Version 1. IANA is requested to add an annotation to the SPF RRTYPE saying (OBSOLETE - use TXT) in the DNS Parameters registry. [NOTE TO RFC EDITOR: (to be changed to ... has added ... upon publication)] This is taken from the latest draft: https://tools.ietf.org/wg/spfbis/draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis/draft-ietf-spfbis-4408bis-06-from-05.wdiff.html just my 2ct -arsen ___ Pdns-users mailing list Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users ___ Pdns-users mailing list Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
Re: [Pdns-users] Setting up PDNS in a DMZ
Forgot to send to the list... Just a suggesting, but if you're using mysql, you might want to look into mysql replication. I use it on my servers instead of master/slave functionality and it works a treat. You also get the added benefit of instant updates. I'd give it a go! Oli Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device -Original Message- From: Nixon, Anthony S. asni...@midrex.com Sender: pdns-users-boun...@mailman.powerdns.com Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 20:50:40 To: pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.compdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com Subject: [Pdns-users] Setting up PDNS in a DMZ Hello, I have three PDNS 3.1 servers running on CentOS 6 with MySQL backends and PowerAdmin interfaces. These are running on VMware 5.1. I have them in a DMZ with a 172.20.1.X subnet and NAT'd to the world (internally and externally are seen as the outside address). My problem is getting the slaves to update off of the master. I have added the master to the slaves as the supermaster, but I get nothing. No transfers at all. If I manually add the zone, it populates once from the master, but then no other updates/transfers take place. I have the correct IPs set up for notifies and transfers on the master to the slaves. But changing a zone on the master does nothing. Should I add the 172.20.1 zone to the servers? I did have each set up in the hosts file with the DMZ addresses. I currently use a BIND server inside to populate the servers, but I really don't want to go with that model. I would prefer to use PDNS for everything. Any help would be appreciated. -- Roxer - This message, including any attachments, is intended only for the use of the addressee and contains information that is PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL. It may be used only by the addressee and may not be divulged without the express consent of the sender. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please erase all copies of the message and its attachments and notify us immediately. Thank you. ___ Pdns-users mailing list Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users ___ Pdns-users mailing list Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
