According to C.S. Peirce, deductive reasoning is of a diagrammatic nature. But 
it’s not always perfectly clear what the nature of a diagram is in this context 
(which is both semiotic and psychological). I’ve just put together a mini-essay 
that aims to clarify this. Due to all the links and quotes within it, 
reformatting it as an email would be time-consuming, so I’ll just give this 
link to it:

Meaning and Modeling (TS ·9) (gnusystems.ca) 
<https://gnusystems.ca/TS/ldm.htm#skelgram> . This takes you to a section of 
the ‘reverse’ side of my online book Turning Signs.

Gary f.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON 
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . 
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu 
with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the message and nothing in the 
body.  More at https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html .
► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP;  moderated by Gary Richmond;  and 
co-managed by him and Ben Udell.

Reply via email to