[PEN-L:12027] Re: Shameless self-promotion

1997-08-29 Thread MScoleman

Monday morning, 9-9:45 EDT I will be on WBAI (and Pacifica Radio) (oh, along
with Karen Nussbaum).  Discussion subject: labor day, women, unions.  maggie
coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED]





[PEN-L:12029] Growing labour strife?

1997-08-29 Thread D Shniad

The Vancouver Sun   Friday 29 August 1997

LABOR PEACE DISTURBED BY PILES OF GARBAGE

Ken MacQueen and Eric Beauchesne

It was a week with garbage on Vancouver streets where the buses 
should have been. There's talk of a national postal strike, and some 
2,000 pulp and paper workers at Fletcher Challenge mills in Crofton, 
Elk Falls and MacKenzie have been striking since mid-July. 

Could it be the province is sliding back to the bad old days of the 
early1980s when the entire B.C. economy seemed impaled on a picket 
sign? 

No need to panic, say those who track B.C. labor issues. 

However, some see signs of unrest on both the provincial and national 
scene. 

A Statistics Canada report, released Thursday to coincide with the 
Labor Day holiday weekend, warns that "labor unrest may be on the 
rise following a prolonged 'cooling-off' period." It says the public 
sector is spoiling for a fight after years of wage freezes and job cuts, 
that union strike funds have swollen in the absence of disputes, and 
the number of days of work lost nationally to strikes is creeping up. 

After three weeks of triple-bagging their garbage, Vancouver residents 
might agree there is trouble in the air. 

Several of those recent provincial disputes, including Wednesday's 
wildcat BC Transit strike and the Vancouver outside workers' strike, 
have landed on the desk of mediator Brian Foley. 

Both are high-profile and troublesome, says Foley, head of the B.C. 
Labor Relations Board mediation division. "But the number of 
disputes over the past year has not been abnormal, has not been 
chaotic. The majority of collective agreements are being settled by the 
parties, either directly or in mediation, without the need for a work 
stoppage." 

This week's flurry of problems is "an accidental convergence of a 
couple of isolated events." says Jerry Lampert, president of the 
Business Council of B.C., which represents 155 major corporations 
employing one-quarter of the provincial workforce. "Generally, since 
the Labor Code came in 1992, the labor relations atmosphere has been 
pretty good." 

Ken Georgetti, president of the B.C. Federation of Labor, also credits 
the 1992 revision of the code by Mike Harcourt's NDP government for 
giving B.C. "relative peace" and the lowest number of work stoppages 
since the Second World War. 

Georgetti, whose organization represents 456,000 unionized workers, 
wonders if the era of peace is coming to an end. He raises as an 
example the 1,100 striking Vancouver outside workers whose wage 
demands are only about 18 cents an hour apart from the city's offer. 

"What you're seeing, although the dispute seems to be over a small 
amount of money, is a level of frustration from workers that they're 
not even keeping their noses above water for the last 10 years," says 
Georgetti. "You're going to see more of this." 

He predicts tougher bargaining from both private and public sector 
workers: government employees because they are falling behind 
private sector settlements, private sector workers, because they aren't 
sharing any of the corporate profits. 

Neither set of employers is leading by example any more, Georgetti 
says. "At some point in time their hypocrisy is going to come back and 
whack them between the eyes." 

Many of his concerns are reflected in Statistics Canada's "portrait of 
the trade union movement." 

It notes that, nationally, 3.3 million person-days of work were lost in 
1996 because of strikes and lockouts, more than twice the 1.6 million 
a year earlier. That still falls far below the nine million days in 1980 
when the country was rocked by more than 1,000 lockouts and strikes 
by what was then a smaller workforce. 

The B.C. ministry of labor's most recent figures show a steady drop in 
person-days lost to strikes -- from 345,850 in 1993 to 295,415 in 1995. 

Ernest Akyeampong, author of the Statistics Canada report, suspects 
the potential for strike action is greatest among government 
employees. 

"With wages freezes and rollbacks, they're certainly in a mood to get 
something back," he said. "There's the potential for action this year." 

The report comes as Canada faces the threat of its first postal strike in 
six years and Ottawa prepares to implement controversial amendments 
to federal labor laws, which business critics argue will give unions too 
much power and add to still high unemployment. The planned changes 
include a partial ban on the use of replacement workers during a strike 
and require employers to provide names and addresses of off-site 
employees to assist unions in the drive to certify such workers. 

B.C. has postponed changes to its labor code after an outcry from 
business, but it is expected to reintroduce amendments in the next 
session of the legislature. 

About 3.5 million Canadians, about one-third of all employees, belong 
to a union. Union membership rose fairly steadily to 3.8 million in 
1990 from 

[PEN-L:12033] Re: ADC = BullShit (fwd)

1997-08-29 Thread Doug Henwood

Shawgi A. Tell wrote:

In short, on matters political and historical, ADC has become a kept
woman of the Arab regimes.

Now that's not a very nice way to put it, is it?

Doug








[PEN-L:12034] Re: ADC = BullShit (fwd)

1997-08-29 Thread Shawgi A. Tell


Greetings,

On Fri, 29 Aug 1997, Doug Henwood wrote:

 Shawgi A. Tell wrote:
 
 In short, on matters political and historical, ADC has become a kept
 woman of the Arab regimes.
 
 Now that's not a very nice way to put it, is it?
 
 Doug

For the sake of accuracy, MER wrote this.  I think what they mean
is that the Arab regimes are despicable.

Shawgi Tell
Graduate School of Education
University at Buffalo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]







[PEN-L:12037] A rally against police brutality

1997-08-29 Thread Louis N Proyect

Between 10 and 15 thousand New Yorkers protested police brutality at rally
this afternoon in City Hall park. They demanded justice for Abner
Louima--in Creole, "Jistis pou Abner Louima"--as they streamed across the
Brooklyn Bridge. The crowd was mostly Haitian, judging from the Creole
conversations I heard all about me.

Louima is the Rodney King of New York. The brutality of Los Angeles cops
was captured on amateur video. The sadism of New York's cops is documented
not by video, but by the extensive damage done to Louima's intestines and
bladder as a consequence of having been sodomized by a toilet plunger in
Brooklyn's 70th Precinct. He is in critical condition and very likely has
suffered permanent damage which will require the use of a colostomy bag.
He is suing New York City for 550 millions dollars and Johnny Cochran has
agreed to represent him.

The Haitian community has correctly blamed the Giuliani administration for
the injustice done to Louima. The cops who sodomized him taunted him in
the act: "It's Giuliani time, not Dinkins time." Dinkins, the rather
hapless former Mayor of New York City, spoke at today's rally and was
roundly booed after making the observation that most New York cops are not
racist.

Giuliani has appointed a investigatory committee that is stacked with
right-wingers. It includes Raymond Joseph, a Haitian whose newspaper
regularly attacked Aristide. Giuliani writes a weekly column in this
newspaper, the "Haiti Observateur". Giuliani himself went to Haiti in 1982
when Jean Claude (Baby Doc) Duvalier was in power. He was a representative
of Reagan's Justice Department on a fact-finding mission. His conclusion?
There was no repression in Haiti and the refugees fleeing the dictator
were economic rather than political refugees.

The Haitian community in New York, especially in the borough of Brooklyn,
is immense with estimates of at least 400,000 according to an informative
column by James Ridgeway and Jean Jean-Pierre in this week's Village
Voice. Economic conditions have been deteriorating steadily in Haiti, even
after the election of Aristide and successive reform administrations. The
neoliberal agenda is being accepted by these administrations, in much the
same way that they are being accepted in South Africa or Vietnam. What is
the alternative to neoliberalism, they ask?

The Haitian community in Brooklyn is in touch with a myriad of
communications outlets that keep them informed of island and local
politics. The left-wing newspaper "Haiti Progres" vies with Raymond
Joseph's newspaper. Creole radio in New York is constantly burning up with
political discussion. There is liberal Radio Soleil, which claims a
half-million listeners to Columbia University's Sunday morning L'Heure
Haitienne. The host of this show is Lionel Legros who had set up a trip to
Haiti for me and other members of Tecnica in 1988 to work with Father
Aristide on an agronomy project. The trip was aborted after Ton-ton
Macoutes launched a reign of repression during the elections in Haiti.

The Haitian community in New York is highly politicized and
well-organized. It is in marked contrast to the African-American community
which suffers from inadequate leadership and poor morale. The economic
depression in the black community of the past 20 years or so seems to have
generated much more drug traffic and aspiring basketball players or rap
artists than political activists unfortunately. One can only hope that the
Haitian political initiatives might provide an example of how to fight
back to a beleaguered black community.

Another interesting development might be the shift in politics to the left
overall from a radicalized and organized immigrant community. There is a
precedent for this. The Communist Party of the early 1920s was made up
primarily of immigrants, Finns in particular. Nowadays, the
"globalization" phenomenon is seen as something that starts in the United
States and expands outward. Perhaps it is time to reflect on another
aspect of globalization. The misery that the United States and other
advanced capitalist countries is bringing to the underdeveloped countries
produces a reaction in the form of population shifts. Mexicans and
Haitians come to the United States, while Africans and Arabs come to
France. If current demographic trends hold up, they expect that a majority
of the work force in the United States in 2050 will not be white and male.
This should challenge many of our most deeply held shibboleths about the
conservatism of Joe Six-Pack.

Louis Proyect








[PEN-L:12038] Disney Globalization

1997-08-29 Thread HANLY


This is passed on from another network with permission.
Cheers, Ken Hanly

A colleague passed on to me this tid-bit --- from Disney's contract with
SUBSCRIBERS to its for-pay Web site:

Disney shall exclusively own all now known or hereafter existing rights to
the Information of every kind and nature THROUGHOUT THE UNIVERSE and shall
be entitled to unrestricted use of the Information for any purpose
whatsoever, commercial or otherwise, without compensation to the provider of
the Information. . .

(emphasis added)


 Colin Boyd, Dept. of Management and Marketing,
College of Commerce, University of Saskatchewan,
 25 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Sask., CANADA S7N 5A7

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Phone: (306) 966 8436 Fax:   (306) 966 8709










[PEN-L:12031] Is Capitalism Sustainable?

1997-08-29 Thread James Devine

While I was doing research on the tourist economy of Jackson Hole, Wyoming,
Richard Douthwaite posted a message with the above title, among other
things saying:

Herman Daly  looked at the extent to which technology had already
increased factor productivity and found the results disappointing. He cites
a study by D.W. Jorgenson and Z. Grilliches (The Explanation of
Productivity Change, Review of Economic Studies, July 1967, pp 249-283)
which indicates that 96.7% of the increase in output between 1945 and 1965
had been due to simply increasing the use of labour, capital and/or energy.
Only the residual, 3.3% was possibly the result of technological advance or
a switch to quality. 

It's been ages since I read that article (if I really did: my memory is
going away). But I think the point is that such studies ("growth
accounting") are extremely iffy, being based on not only neoclassical
economics but some unreasonable auxillary assumptions such as that
"factors" are hired in competitive markets (and thus paid according to
their marginal products). Crucially, one's results depends on one's biases
("priors"). At that time, Jorgenson assumed that all growth could be
accounted for by factor input (i.e., zero residual), so it's no surprise
that his residual approximated zero. At a UC-Berkeley seminar, he was asked
why there were no nuclear power plants in the 19th century and answered:
the factor prices were wrong. In other words, nuclear power arose not
because of science but because prices changed, creating profits for those
interested in creating nukes. So I don't think one can trust that research
very much.

I really couldn't read all of what others on pen-l contributed, but here
are my two centavos: Is capitalism sustainable? I think the problem is the
bias in technical change, which under capitalism leans toward internalizing
external benefits (grabbing public resources for private hands) and
externalizing internal costs (dumping costs on society  nature). That's
what's profitable. Absent sufficient pressure from the people, it leads to
environmental disaster. 

Concerning interaction with the other "big contradiction" of capitalism,
class relations, an environmental crisis -- like more "normal" economic
crises -- creates opportunities which might cause working-class
mobilization, reforming and/or abolishing the system. But such results are
far from automatic. 

(BTW, our society has other contradictions, just as our society is more
than just capitalism. In addition, we see sexism, racism, etc.)







in pen-l solidarity,

Jim Devine   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://clawww.lmu.edu/fall%201997/ECON/jdevine.html
Econ. Dept., Loyola Marymount Univ.
7900 Loyola Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90045-8410 USA
310/338-2948 (daytime, during workweek); FAX: 310/338-1950
"Segui il tuo corso, e lascia dir le genti." (Go your own way
and let people talk.) -- K. Marx, paraphrasing Dante A.






[PEN-L:12032] ADC = BullShit (fwd)

1997-08-29 Thread Shawgi A. Tell

FYI

Shawgi Tell
Graduate School of Education
University at Buffalo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- Forwarded message --
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 1997 09:41:43 -0400
From: MID-EAST REALITIES [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ADC = BullShit

..   ___      __
   /  |/  /  /___/  / /_ //M I D - E A S T   R E A L I T I E S
  / /|_/ /  /_/_   / /\\ http://WWW.MiddleEast.Org
 /_/  /_/  /___/  /_/  \\  
"Washington Scene" - an occasional series
___
  YOUR BEST SOURCE FOR CONCISE AND INDEPENDENT INFORMATION AND
   _
  A D C  =  B U L L S H I T
  _
  To receive MER regularly email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 A  D  C   =   B  U  L  L  S  H  I  T


"Most of what I've heard from this panel is BULLSHIT."

   First audience comment
   at ADC annual conference
   
MER - Washington - 8/27/97

There are many reasons the Israeli/Jewish lobby rules in Washington
with hardly any effective opposition.

One of the main reasons is that the various Arab-American organizations
that exist are all controlled, manipulated, and usually paralyzed
by the political and financial corruption of the Arab world.  That
corruption and impotence is translated to Washington by Arab ambassadors 
and the many they employ, most especially by Saudi Prince Bandar Bin 
Sultan, now one of the longest-serving Arab representatives in 
Washington.

Not widely known, Bandar has actually been working closely and 
personally with some of the main elements of the Israeli/Jewish lobby 
for years, even before the Gulf war in 1991.  His goal is simple -- use 
the power and influence of the Israeli/Jewish lobby to perpetuate the 
rule of the al-Saud family in "the Kingdom" -- everyone else be damned.
For many matters involving commenting to the often gullible press, the 
Saudis use Jim Zogby, a kind of public relations flak masquerading under 
the guise of the "Arab American Institute" (AAI). 

When it comes to the only Arab American organization that has any 
grass-roots, the American Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC),
the situation is a bit more complicated.  ADC does a few useful, though
always very easy, things in the area of discrimination.  Indeed, nothing 
could be easier in America then to oppose discrimination; and actually 
ADC doesn't really do that very well either.  But far more importantly, 
when it comes to the serious and historical political issues of our day, 
here ADC is worse than a failure, it is a fraud and a deception -- one
largely perpetrated on its own membership.

That fraudulent reality might well have been behind the private and 
unheeded call a few years ago by ADC founder, former Senator James 
Abourezk from South Dakota, for the organization to be closed down. 
Instead, some of the long-time Washington opportunists, with former 
Arab League Ambassador Clovis Maksoud and wife Hala in the lead, pushed 
ADC to make a kind of pact with the Arab establishment.  In return for 
financial support from Arab businessmen closely aligned with the 
American-sponsored client regimes in the Middle East, ADC would not 
involve itself in anything politically controversial (i.e., anything 
important), would support the "peace process" and the Arafat regime 
(no matter how much corruption and repression), and would not involve
itself in any way against the terrible abuses and corruption so rampant
in many of the key Arab countries -- most especially Saudi Arabia, 
Egypt, Kuwait and Jordan.

In short, on matters political and historical, ADC has become a kept 
woman of the Arab regimes.  All kinds of simplistic press releases go
out to unknowing ADC supporters around the country touting as grand ADC 
accomplishments what are really very small, usually relatively 
insignificant, always easy matters.  But when it comes to any major 
political issues, ADC hardly ever has anything to say and even when it 
does it is always the tritest of slogans always corresponding to 
whatever the Arab "client-regimes" are pushing at the time.  

This sad reality couldn't have been better demonstrated this summer 
then what took place at the ADC annual conference which came during the
month of the 30th anniversary of the 1967 war, a theme which was in 
fact one by which the conference was promoted.

After 30 years of brutal and crippling occupation, after a decade of the 
"Intifada", after the catastrophe that befell Lebanon, the 1982 war, 
the Gulf/Iraq War, and the apartheid-type "Peace process", all that ADC 
could muster for this 30th anniversary was a dull and 

[PEN-L:12035] Re: ADC = BullShit (fwd)

1997-08-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]

On Fri, 29 Aug 1997, Doug Henwood wrote:

 Shawgi A. Tell wrote:
 
 In short, on matters political and historical, ADC has become a kept
 woman of the Arab regimes.
 
 Now that's not a very nice way to put it, is it?

Au contraire, Doug, that's the very breath and soul of objectivity!







[PEN-L:12044] Slate on taxes

1997-08-29 Thread Michael Perelman

Slate is Microsoft's online mag.

The article has a graph showing that the stock market goes up when taxes
increase.  Yes, I know that the Dow Jones does not really represent well
being for most of us, but it makes a nice debating point foor certain
purposes.
-- 
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929
 
Tel. 916-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]





[PEN-L:12040] Re: taxes

1997-08-29 Thread Tom Walker

Michael Perelman wrote,

Check out the new article in Slate on taxes.

Why? and How?


Regards, 

Tom Walker
^^^
knoW Ware Communications
Vancouver, B.C., CANADA
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(604) 688-8296 
^^^
The TimeWork Web: HTTP://WWW.VCN.BC.CA/TIMEWORK/






[PEN-L:12039] Spy phones

1997-08-29 Thread HANLY

This is reprinted from another net with permission
  Cheers, Ken Hanly

Here is another of those "1984" future technology products which offers
some positive benefits at the expense of major intrusions on privacy, just
like the closed circuit tv camera systems which now operate in most British
towns. This piece from today's UK press refers at one point to the "Suzy
Lamplugh Trust": Suzy Lamplugh was a London real estate agent who was
murdered in an empty house by an apparent prospective client who had asked
her to show the house to him.

The world of new technology is sure taking us into new moral minefields.

Colin Boyd


Spy phones reveal cheating husbands

A MOBILE telephone being developed by British Telecom could soon spell an
end to the deceptions by idle employees, stressed executives and
adulterers.

The Mobile Social Alarm or Mosa, currently under development at BT, will be
the first telephone that can send precise details of the caller's location
to the person receiving the call.

Workers will no longer be able to phone the office pretending to be sick
when they are at the beach and movements of cheating spouses will be
exposed because the phone will show the caller's location to within 30
feet.

According to Don Golding, a mobile applications engineer in charge of the
project, companies will also be able to call the Mosa-phone without their
employees' knowledge to track staff.

He said that BT hoped one day to reduce the size of the spy phone to that
of a wristwatch. However, he stressed that the Mosa-phone had a more
serious purpose. Mosa-phones will have a panic button that automatically
alerts authorities of the holders' location.

British Telecom, which is working with the Suzy Lamplugh Trust, believes
that the phone could be used in emergencies by lone women travellers and
the elderly.

British Telecom has been talking to mobile phone manufacturers about the
Mosa-phone and is preparing to give the system a trial. It expects the
tracking feature will add around =A350 to the cost of a mobile phone. The
first system will work only when the phone holder is outdoors and within
sight of the GPS satellites.

However, the company is working on three systems to track down errant
employees and spouses indoors. They use triangulation between several
mobile phone relay stations to plot the phone holder's position.


 Colin Boyd, Dept. of Management and Marketing,
College of Commerce, University of Saskatchewan,
 25 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Sask., CANADA S7N 5A7

 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Phone: (306) 966 8436 Fax:   (306) 966 8709










[PEN-L:12036] taxes

1997-08-29 Thread Michael Perelman

Check out the new article in Slate on taxes.
--
Michael Perelman
Economics Department
California State University
Chico, CA 95929

Tel. 916-898-5321
E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]





[PEN-L:12028] When workers strike back

1997-08-29 Thread D Shniad

The Globe and Mail, August 27, 1997

WHEN THE WORKERS STRIKE BACK

Stephen Roach

The recently resolved United Parcel Service strike 
was a shot across the bow of the inflationless 1990s.  
U.S. workers are now beginning to challenge the very 
forces that have led to a spectacular resurgence in 
corporate profits and competitiveness.  They are, in 
effect, saying "no" to years of corporate cost-cutting 
directed primarily at the labour force.

The strike and the settlement, largely on the 
union's terms, challenge the wisdom of a Federal 
Reserve that seems content to ignore the danger of 
renewed inflation.  And the settlement underscores the 
potential for a sharp decline in stock and bond 
markets.

These concerns are at odds with today's conventional 
wisdom.  Many believe the U.S. economy has entered a 
new era in which globalization, deregulation and the 
Information Age have combined to produce a rare and 
powerful recovery, led by increased worker 
productivity.  In this scenario, wage gains are 
largely offset by the increased productivity.  As a 
result, costs are held in check, inflation remains 
quiescent and profit margins widen inexorably.  The 
financial markets enjoy the best of all worlds: low 
interest rates underpin a strong bond market and 
health corporate earnings feed an ever-rising stock 
market.

The productivity-led recovery offers ample rewards 
for shareholders and workers alike.  Labour can reap 
higher wages as its productivity increases, while 
investors can reap handsome returns.  It's quite 
possible, however, that a very different scenario has 
been responsible for the good news on inflation and 
corporate profits in recent years.  Call it a labour-
crunch recovery -- one that flourishes only because 
corporate America puts unrelenting pressure on its 
work force.

This is a much tougher and more pessimistic vision 
of the U.S. economy in the 1990s.  Pressured by 
intense global competition to boost productivity in 
information or service industries, businesses become 
fixated on slashing labour costs.  Intimidated by the 
threat of job security, labour initially complies with 
the demands.  Companies hire more temporary and part-
time workers, and full-time workers are made to 
stretch their work schedules as never before.  At the 
same time, employees begin to bear more the cost of 
their benefits, including health insurance.  Wages, 
adjusted for inflation, are squeezed, leading to a 
near stagnation that has persisted for more than two 
decades.

Unlike the productivity-led recovery, the labour-
crunch recovery is not sustainable.  It is a recipe 
for mounting tensions, in which a raw power struggle 
occurs between capital and labour.  Investors are 
initially rewarded beyond their wildest dreams, but 
those rewards could eventually be wiped out by a 
worker backlash.

Investors are quick to defend the miracles of the 
productivity-led recovery that promises no end to the 
bull markets of the 1990s.  But there's one small 
problem: there's not a shred of credible evidence in 
the macro-economy that supports the notion of a 
meaningful improvement in U.S. productivity.  Indeed, 
in the just-completed revision of the national 
economic accounts, the poor productivity performance 
of the 1990s was left essentially unaltered.  Average 
annual gains over the past six years were slightly 
less than 1 per cent, little different from the 
disappointing performance of the 1980s and less than 
half the gains of the 1950s and 1960s.

Productivity revivalists argue that the data must be 
wrong.  But the weight of evidence is increasingly in 
favour of the labour-crunch scenario.  And it's not 
just the productivity statistics that favour this 
argument.  There has also been a dramatic realignment 
of the economic pie, with a much larger slice going to 
capital and a smaller one to labour.  Which takes us 
back to the recently settled UPS strike.

For UPS, the cost of settlement, by some estimates, 
will eventually be as much as $1 billion (U.S.) a 
year.  In the end, that's what worker backlash is all 
about.  It speaks of a labour force that challenges 
the very notion of cost-cutting that has been central 
to economic recovery in the 1990s.

-

Stephen Roach is chief economist and director of 
global economics for Morgan Stanley Dean Witter.  
Re-printed from the New York Times.





[PEN-L:12025] FW: BLS Daily Report

1997-08-29 Thread Richardson_D

BLS DAILY REPORT, THURSDAY, AUGUST 28, 1997

RELEASED TODAY:  The number of employed youth increased by 2.8 million
(not seasonally adjusted) from April to July, the traditional summertime
peak for youth employment.  This year's seasonal expansion in employment
of 16- to 24-year-olds was slightly larger than the 2.6 million increase
in 1996.  The number of unemployed young people, which also grows at
this time every year, rose by 448,000, somewhat fewer than a year
earlier (603,000)  

Wage data compiled by the Bureau of National Affairs for all industries
in the first 34 weeks of 1997 show that the median first-year wage
increase in newly negotiated contracts was 3 percent, the same as the
comparable figure for the same period of 1996 (Daily Labor Report,
page D-9).

For decades, the U.S. has been evolving from a manufacturing economy to
a service economy.  As Labor Day 1997 approaches, two major corporations
stand in sharp relief, says The Wall Street Journal (page B1).  Wal-Mart
Stores Inc., the discount retailer, has passed General Motors Corp., the
auto giant, as the nation's largest private employer.  The shift is more
than symbolic.  Union jobs with lush pay and benefits, like GM
assembly-line work, are disappearing.  In their place are nonunion jobs
like in the men's department at a Wal-Mart.  Worker in both punch a time
clock and share a stake in their employers' success.  The Wal-Mart
workday is less physically taxing than GM's, but the hours are longer
and the pay barely supports even a thrifty family.  Still, Wal-Mart
offers a measure of responsibility and a path of advancement to hourly
workers, thousands of whom are promoted to management each year 

The 10 metropolitan areas with the fastest growth in personal income
during 1995 were mainly in the Southwest, Rocky Mountains, and Southeast
regions, according to data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the
Department of Commerce.  Three of the 10 areas were all or partly in
Arizona, with the Yuma area leading the list with a 17.1 percent gain in
personal income that was attributed to a large expansion in vegetable
crop production.  The average gain across the United States was 6.2
percent.  It was the first release of 1995 personal income data by
metropolitan areas Looking at per capita income, BEA found that San
Francisco had the highest in 1995.  Close behind was the West Palm
Beach-Boca Raton, Fla., metro area.  At the other end of the scale, "all
of the areas with the lowest per capita personal income, except El Paso,
Texas, were small in terms of personal income and population, and were
located in the Southwest or Southeast regions."  The five lowest ranking
were on the U.S.-Mexico border (Daily Labor Report, page D-1).

Office smog probably isn't something you have heard of, yet.  But you
will soon, says Alun M. Anderson, editor of "New Science," a weekly
international science magazine, whose article appears on the op. ed.
page of The Washington Post.  The article says that humans, perfumes,
chemicals, and electronic equipment don't always live happily together


In an op. ed. column, "All Globalization Is Local," Jim Hoagland quotes
from a speech Alan Greenspan, chairman of the Federal Reserve Board,
made earlier this summer at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for
Scholars.  Greenspan ended by "arguing that democracy is a necessary
component for the efficient long-term functioning of a free market
economy.  Only `a free press and government data information systems
that are perceived to be free of hidden political manipulation' can
empower consumers and producers to shift resources rationally" 







[PEN-L:12024] Labor Day, 1997

1997-08-29 Thread Jim Davis

LABOR DAY 1997: FULL-TIME, PART-TIME AND UNEMPLOYED WORKERS
INTENSIFY THE STRUGGLE

By General Baker

DETROIT -- The year 1997 has sparked an intensification of the
class struggle here at home. Labor Day 1997 follows the first
anniversary of the so-called welfare reform bill, which ended the
historic social safety net dating from the New Deal of the 1930s.

Different states are still competing on the basis of which of them
can cut the safety net the deepest and fastest, beyond the
federally demanded cuts. But this section of society is fighting
back, as shown by the National Welfare Rights Union, with its
Kensington branch, when they marched from Philadelphia to the
United Nations. With the support of AFSCME and other unions, they
protested the welfare reform bill as a violation of human rights.

In Detroit, the newspaper strike is entering its 26th month. Here,
Labor Day has been bottlenecked since a federal judge refused to
issue an injunction that would have forced the newspapers to hire
back all of the strikers at an estimated $50 million in back
wages. This marked a severe setback to the union, whose strategy
for victory lay solely on the legal channels of the NLRB and the
courts.

The United Parcel Service strike and its aftermath show some
tremendous lessons for the upcoming period. No matter how
importantly UPS or the Teamsters viewed the pension package, the
issue of the part-time worker continued to take center stage in
the walkout. In the eyes of the general public, the strike became
a battleground for a new and growing section of society.

In the wake of the partial victory of the UPS struggle, President
Clinton quickly imposed a 60-day cooling-off period on employees
of Amtrak, in an effort to thwart an outbreak of strikes there.

With these struggles before us, we salute each other on this Labor
Day as a new class of impoverished proletarians begins to assert
its leadership of the social upheavals of our time.

[General Baker is the chair of the Steering Committee of the
League of Revolutionaries for a New America and a member of Local
600 of the United Auto Workers]


**
This article originated in the PEOPLE'S TRIBUNE (Online Edition),
Vol. 24 No. 9 / September, 1997; P.O. Box 3524, Chicago, IL
60654, [EMAIL PROTECTED] or WWW:

 http://www.mcs.com/~jdav/league.html

For free electronic subscription, email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "Subscribe" in the subject line.

Feel free to reproduce; please include this message with
reproductions of this article.
**