Brad, True enough. But Michael P. is on to something that Hardin and most commentators regarding the "tragedy of the medieval grazing commons" case that Hardin was talking about rarely recognize. The "tragedy" not only coincided with the emergence of privatization, but that privatization in fact actively aggravated the problem as the commons grazing areas were reduced in size due to the enclosures. All these people who claim that the enclosures were a "rational response to the tragedy" have things backwards. More generally, as has been mentioned, it is possible for "common property" to be managed in ways that control or limit access. The original economics literature on this from Gordon's 1954 JPE paper on fisheries totally confused "common property" with "open access," a confusion that Hardin picked up on and amplified with his much-cited _Science_ article. The realization that these are distinct issues and that it is open access that is the source of the problem came later. I would date it to the 1975 paper in the _Natural Resources Journal_ by S.V. Ciriacy-Wantrup and Richard C. Bishop, "'Common Property' as a Concept in Natural Resources Policy." Since then we have had a huge literature on this by people like Elinor Ostrom and Daniel Bromley on how to manage access in commonly owned properties, with a classic example of a successful system being the Swiss alpine grazing commons that are owned by Swiss villages and have been well managed since the 1200s. Certainly, the bigger the thing to be managed and the more people involved in it, the harder it is to set up a system of access control. These are the problems with the very large Ogallala aquifer. And this applies to privately owned property as well, which most of the Ogallala aquifer is, although by many different parties. I have a paper on this that emphasizes that the nature and scale of the ecosystem being managed is crucial, "Systemic Crises in Hierarchical Ecological Economies," _Land Economics_, May 1995, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 163-172. Barkley Rosser On Wed, 17 Feb 1999 10:03:38 -0800 Brad De Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Hardin's story is a myth. In truth, the communities that he describes had > >customs and institutions that kept the amount of livestock in check. > > As long as population densities are low, and social pressures are strong... > -- Rosser Jr, John Barkley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[PEN-L:3508] Re: Tragedy of the Commons
Rosser Jr, John Barkley Wed, 17 Feb 1999 14:47:47 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)