> Date:          Wed, 30 Apr 1997 08:18:54 -0700 (PDT)
> Reply-to:      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From:          "Harry M. Cleaver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:            Multiple recipients of list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject:       [PEN-L:9745] ALERT! Hse. Committee to Vote on Internet Privacy Bill 
>Soon (fwd)

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Tue, 29 Apr 1997 15:39:26 -0400
> From: Bob Palacios <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: ALERT! Hse. Committee to Vote on Internet Privacy Bill Soon
> Resent-Date: Tue, 29 Apr 1997 15:37:55 -0400
> Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> ==============================================================================
>   ___  _     _____ ____ _____ _
>  / _ \| |   | ____|  _ \_   _| |   THE HOUSE PREPARES TO ENSURE ENCRYPTION
> | |_| | |   |  _| | |_) || | | |    AND PRIVACY ON THE INTERNET; SAFE
> |  _  | |___| |___|  _ < | | |_|     BILL (HR 695) ABOUT TO BE VOTED ON!
> |_| |_|_____|_____|_| \_\|_| (_)               April 28, 1997
> 
>                  Do not forward this alert after June 1, 1997.
> 
>                         This alert brought to you by:
> 
>     Americans for Tax Reform            Center for Democracy and Technology
>     Eagle Forum                         EF-Florida
>     Electronic Frontier Foundation      Electronic Privacy Information Ctr.
>     Voters Telecommunications Watch     Wired Magazine
> 
> _____________________________________________________________________________
> . . .

In the interests of establishing guilt by association,
can you tell me why the Eagle Forum and Americans
for Tax Reform, both G.O.P. fronts for illegal campaign
finance among other things, support this bill?

And please don't tell me it's to safeguard freedom.

Curious,

MBS


===================================================
Max B. Sawicky            Economic Policy Institute
[EMAIL PROTECTED]          1660 L Street, NW
202-775-8810 (voice)      Ste. 1200
202-775-0819 (fax)        Washington, DC  20036

Opinions above do not necessarily reflect the views
of anyone associated with the Economic Policy
Institute.
===================================================


Reply via email to