Conference on the Special Relationship (UK)
[ Presenting plain-text part of multi-format email ] Call for a Conference on the Special Relationship Website: www.specialrelationship.net Subscribe to the discussion list by sending a blank message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You are invited to participate in a project to organise a two-day Conference on the Special Relationship. It will be a national conference with international dimension, with speakers from the US, the Middle East and elsewhere. It will take place in Sheffield in early 2005, and maybe also in Manchester and London. A book will be produced of the Conference papers. The main themes of the Conference will include: -the origins of the special relationship in post-WW2 Middle East, in particular the 1953 military coup in Iran and the 1956 Suez Crisis; -the economic relations between the US and the UK; -the $ vs.?, US vs. Europe -the special relationship goes to war - the invasion and military occupation of Iraq; -the Israel-US-UK triangle -what is imperialism? (This has been included as a theme since examination of the specific alliance between imperialist USA and UK needs to be informed by a working concept of imperialism in general) Please contact us via our website or discussion list for a full Conference Prospectus, in which these themes are broken down into individual elements. All who read this are invited to consider submitting a paper on any of these topics - and we welcome suggestions for new topics. The Conference Working Group invites and urges you to offer some of your time over the next twelve months to realising this project. We need YOUR help with many and varied tasks - from selecting articles for the website and considering proposed papers, to designing publicity, raising funds, translating important articles into English, organising the Conference itself. Please volunteer to help share these tasks, and you will also share in the overall design and direction of the event. *** What is the special relationship? The 1956 Suez crisis ended Britain's pretensions of being a stand-alone imperial power. Ever since, Britain has protected its vast interests in the Middle East and elsewhere by maintaining the closest of alliances with the USA. This special relationship is responsible for doz-ens of military coups and invasions, the deaths of millions of people, and the theft of trillions of dollars. Few phenomena are as important, yet suffer such incomprehension, as the special relation-ship. At the Labour Party Conference, Jeremy Corbyn asked with amazement why are we, a British Labour Government with a very large Parliamentary majority, so signed up to the ul-tra-right wing George Bush? A review of the 50-yearspecial relationship and of the Labour Party's rôle within it would show that nothing could be more natural. Did you know. Question: what is the name of biggest oil com-pany within the US? Answer: BP (British Petroleum), which has 40% of its employees in the USA. Question: the ruling families of which country own two of the three biggest oil companies in the world? Answer: Britain (BP and Shell; Exxon is the big-gest). BP has major interests from Colombia to Africa to central Asia. Along with other British banks and multinationals, it relies on US mili-tary power to protect its property and super-profits. Question: which country is 2nd only to the USA in the size of its empire of overseas wealth? Answer: .you've guessed it; Britain. In 2001, Britain's overseas direct investments totalled $902bn, 14.4% of the world total (compared to 21.1% owned by US imperialists, 7.9% owned by the French, 7.8% owned by Germans, and 4.6% owned by Japanese). * The motive for the Conference is to respond to the almost universal failure of the anti-war movement to comprehend why Britain has joined in the US-led war and occupation of Iraq. Blair is Bush's poodle sums up a widespread view, propounded by Steve Bell cartoons, Tony Benn, the SWP and many other influential voices critical of the Blair government's actions. It is a notion which only makes sense if we ignore the fact that Britain is itself an imperialist power, the home for two of the three largest oil companies in the world, and the owner of the second-largest stock of FDI after the USA (second to none in relation to its size). The Conference organisers (at the moment, myself and a number of other non-aligned activists in the anti-sanctions and anti-war movements) have a working concept of the 'special relationship' which the Conference will test and enrich. Central to it is the perception that the 'special relationship' was forged in the Middle East following WW2, as the US and UK were forced into an alliance in order to confront and roll back democratic and nationalist movements in oil-rich and strategically important Iran and Arabia. There is no special relationship (or only a weak reflection of it) in
Re: Conference on the Special Relationship (UK)
I don't see why this conference is needed. The US tells the UK what to do. They do it. Period. Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine -Original Message- From: k hanly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 7:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PEN-L] Conference on the Special Relationship (UK) [ Presenting plain-text part of multi-format email ] Call for a Conference on the Special Relationship Website: www.specialrelationship.net Subscribe to the discussion list by sending a blank message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You are invited to participate in a project to organise a two-day Conference on the Special Relationship. It will be a national conference with international dimension, with speakers from the US, the Middle East and elsewhere. It will take place in Sheffield in early 2005, and maybe also in Manchester and London. A book will be produced of the Conference papers. The main themes of the Conference will include: -the origins of the special relationship in post-WW2 Middle East, in particular the 1953 military coup in Iran and the 1956 Suez Crisis; -the economic relations between the US and the UK; -the $ vs.?, US vs. Europe -the special relationship goes to war - the invasion and military occupation of Iraq; -the Israel-US-UK triangle -what is imperialism? (This has been included as a theme since examination of the specific alliance between imperialist USA and UK needs to be informed by a working concept of imperialism in general) Please contact us via our website or discussion list for a full Conference Prospectus, in which these themes are broken down into individual elements. All who read this are invited to consider submitting a paper on any of these topics - and we welcome suggestions for new topics. The Conference Working Group invites and urges you to offer some of your time over the next twelve months to realising this project. We need YOUR help with many and varied tasks - from selecting articles for the website and considering proposed papers, to designing publicity, raising funds, translating important articles into English, organising the Conference itself. Please volunteer to help share these tasks, and you will also share in the overall design and direction of the event. *** What is the special relationship? The 1956 Suez crisis ended Britain's pretensions of being a stand-alone imperial power. Ever since, Britain has protected its vast interests in the Middle East and elsewhere by maintaining the closest of alliances with the USA. This special relationship is responsible for doz-ens of military coups and invasions, the deaths of millions of people, and the theft of trillions of dollars. Few phenomena are as important, yet suffer such incomprehension, as the special relation-ship. At the Labour Party Conference, Jeremy Corbyn asked with amazement why are we, a British Labour Government with a very large Parliamentary majority, so signed up to the ul-tra-right wing George Bush? A review of the 50-yearspecial relationship and of the Labour Party's rôle within it would show that nothing could be more natural. Did you know. Question: what is the name of biggest oil com-pany within the US? Answer: BP (British Petroleum), which has 40% of its employees in the USA. Question: the ruling families of which country own two of the three biggest oil companies in the world? Answer: Britain (BP and Shell; Exxon is the big-gest). BP has major interests from Colombia to Africa to central Asia. Along with other British banks and multinationals, it relies on US mili-tary power to protect its property and super-profits. Question: which country is 2nd only to the USA in the size of its empire of overseas wealth? Answer: .you've guessed it; Britain. In 2001, Britain's overseas direct investments totalled $902bn, 14.4% of the world total (compared to 21.1% owned by US imperialists, 7.9% owned by the French, 7.8% owned by Germans, and 4.6% owned by Japanese). * The motive for the Conference is to respond to the almost universal failure of the anti-war movement to comprehend why Britain has joined in the US-led war and occupation of Iraq. Blair is Bush's poodle sums up a widespread view, propounded by Steve Bell cartoons, Tony Benn, the SWP and many other influential voices critical of the Blair government's actions. It is a notion which only makes sense if we ignore the fact that Britain is itself an imperialist power, the home for two of the three largest oil companies in the world, and the owner of the second-largest stock of FDI after the USA (second to none in relation to its size). The Conference organisers
Re: Conference on the Special Relationship (UK)
If this were true Blair would have torpedoed Kyoto. --pb I don't see why this conference is needed. The US tells the UK what to do. They do it. Period. Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine -Original Message- From: k hanly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 7:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PEN-L] Conference on the Special Relationship (UK) [ Presenting plain-text part of multi-format email ] Call for a Conference on the Special Relationship Website: www.specialrelationship.net Subscribe to the discussion list by sending a blank message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You are invited to participate in a project to organise a two-day Conference on the Special Relationship. It will be a national conference with international dimension, with speakers from the US, the Middle East and elsewhere. It will take place in Sheffield in early 2005, and maybe also in Manchester and London. A book will be produced of the Conference papers. The main themes of the Conference will include: -the origins of the special relationship in post-WW2 Middle East, in particular the 1953 military coup in Iran and the 1956 Suez Crisis; -the economic relations between the US and the UK; -the $ vs.?, US vs. Europe -the special relationship goes to war - the invasion and military occupation of Iraq; -the Israel-US-UK triangle -what is imperialism? (This has been included as a theme since examination of the specific alliance between imperialist USA and UK needs to be informed by a working concept of imperialism in general) Please contact us via our website or discussion list for a full Conference Prospectus, in which these themes are broken down into individual elements. All who read this are invited to consider submitting a paper on any of these topics - and we welcome suggestions for new topics. The Conference Working Group invites and urges you to offer some of your time over the next twelve months to realising this project. We need YOUR help with many and varied tasks - from selecting articles for the website and considering proposed papers, to designing publicity, raising funds, translating important articles into English, organising the Conference itself. Please volunteer to help share these tasks, and you will also share in the overall design and direction of the event. *** What is the special relationship? The 1956 Suez crisis ended Britain's pretensions of being a stand-alone imperial power. Ever since, Britain has protected its vast interests in the Middle East and elsewhere by maintaining the closest of alliances with the USA. This special relationship is responsible for doz-ens of military coups and invasions, the deaths of millions of people, and the theft of trillions of dollars. Few phenomena are as important, yet suffer such incomprehension, as the special relation-ship. At the Labour Party Conference, Jeremy Corbyn asked with amazement why are we, a British Labour Government with a very large Parliamentary majority, so signed up to the ul-tra-right wing George Bush? A review of the 50-yearspecial relationship and of the Labour Party's rôle within it would show that nothing could be more natural. Did you know. Question: what is the name of biggest oil com-pany within the US? Answer: BP (British Petroleum), which has 40% of its employees in the USA. Question: the ruling families of which country own two of the three biggest oil companies in the world? Answer: Britain (BP and Shell; Exxon is the big-gest). BP has major interests from Colombia to Africa to central Asia. Along with other British banks and multinationals, it relies on US mili-tary power to protect its property and super-profits. Question: which country is 2nd only to the USA in the size of its empire of overseas wealth? Answer: .you've guessed it; Britain. In 2001, Britain's overseas direct investments totalled $902bn, 14.4% of the world total (compared to 21.1% owned by US imperialists, 7.9% owned by the French, 7.8% owned by Germans, and 4.6% owned by Japanese). * The motive for the Conference is to respond to the almost universal failure of the anti-war movement to comprehend why Britain has joined in the US-led war and occupation of Iraq. Blair is Bush's poodle sums up a widespread view, propounded by Steve Bell cartoons, Tony Benn, the SWP and many other influential voices critical of the Blair government's actions. It is a notion which only makes sense if we ignore the fact that Britain is itself an imperialist power, the home for two of the three largest oil companies in the world, and the owner of the second-largest stock of FDI after the USA (second to none in relation to its size). The Conference organisers (at the moment
Re: Conference on the Special Relationship (UK)
maybe the US elite didn't want him to? or they never thought of it? in any event, I was simply making a hyperbolic cynical remark spawned by a Monday-morning caffeine shortage. Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine -Original Message- From: Paul Baer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 9:25 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PEN-L] Conference on the Special Relationship (UK) If this were true Blair would have torpedoed Kyoto. --pb I don't see why this conference is needed. The US tells the UK what to do. They do it. Period. Jim Devine [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bellarmine.lmu.edu/~jdevine -Original Message- From: k hanly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 7:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PEN-L] Conference on the Special Relationship (UK) [ Presenting plain-text part of multi-format email ] Call for a Conference on the Special Relationship Website: www.specialrelationship.net Subscribe to the discussion list by sending a blank message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You are invited to participate in a project to organise a two-day Conference on the Special Relationship. It will be a national conference with international dimension, with speakers from the US, the Middle East and elsewhere. It will take place in Sheffield in early 2005, and maybe also in Manchester and London. A book will be produced of the Conference papers. The main themes of the Conference will include: -the origins of the special relationship in post-WW2 Middle East, in particular the 1953 military coup in Iran and the 1956 Suez Crisis; -the economic relations between the US and the UK; -the $ vs.?, US vs. Europe -the special relationship goes to war - the invasion and military occupation of Iraq; -the Israel-US-UK triangle -what is imperialism? (This has been included as a theme since examination of the specific alliance between imperialist USA and UK needs to be informed by a working concept of imperialism in general) Please contact us via our website or discussion list for a full Conference Prospectus, in which these themes are broken down into individual elements. All who read this are invited to consider submitting a paper on any of these topics - and we welcome suggestions for new topics. The Conference Working Group invites and urges you to offer some of your time over the next twelve months to realising this project. We need YOUR help with many and varied tasks - from selecting articles for the website and considering proposed papers, to designing publicity, raising funds, translating important articles into English, organising the Conference itself. Please volunteer to help share these tasks, and you will also share in the overall design and direction of the event. *** What is the special relationship? The 1956 Suez crisis ended Britain's pretensions of being a stand-alone imperial power. Ever since, Britain has protected its vast interests in the Middle East and elsewhere by maintaining the closest of alliances with the USA. This special relationship is responsible for doz-ens of military coups and invasions, the deaths of millions of people, and the theft of trillions of dollars. Few phenomena are as important, yet suffer such incomprehension, as the special relation-ship. At the Labour Party Conference, Jeremy Corbyn asked with amazement why are we, a British Labour Government with a very large Parliamentary majority, so signed up to the ul-tra-right wing George Bush? A review of the 50-yearspecial relationship and of the Labour Party's rôle within it would show that nothing could be more natural. Did you know. Question: what is the name of biggest oil com-pany within the US? Answer: BP (British Petroleum), which has 40% of its employees in the USA. Question: the ruling families of which country own two of the three biggest oil companies in the world? Answer: Britain (BP and Shell; Exxon is the big-gest). BP has major interests from Colombia to Africa to central Asia. Along with other British banks and multinationals, it relies on US mili-tary power to protect its property and super-profits. Question: which country is 2nd only to the USA in the size of its empire of overseas wealth? Answer: .you've guessed it; Britain. In 2001, Britain's overseas direct investments totalled $902bn, 14.4% of the world total (compared to 21.1% owned by US imperialists, 7.9% owned by the French, 7.8% owned by Germans, and 4.6% owned by Japanese
