Re: Re: RE: Aesopian Language on Maillists

[Tom Walker]

Joanna Bujes wrote:

> well, wouldn't you be?
> 
> Joanna
> 
> At 05:50 PM 11/14/2002 -0800, you wrote:
> >"the death of Satan was a tragedy for the imagination"
> > -- Wallace Stevens
> >
> >Satan is NOT dead, 'e's just pinin' for the fjords.

Not really. I'm one hour away from 'em by bus, 40 min. by car.

Re: RE: Aesopian Language on Maillists

[joanna bujes]

well, wouldn't you be?

Joanna

At 05:50 PM 11/14/2002 -0800, you wrote:

"the death of Satan was a tragedy for the imagination"
-- Wallace Stevens

Satan is NOT dead, 'e's just pinin' for the fjords.

Tom Walker
604 255 4812

Re: RE: Aesopian Language on Maillists

[Doug Henwood]

Devine, James wrote:


If CJ is Charles Januzzi (sp?), I don't equate him with Louis (LPN?) 
at all. As for Satan, he doesn't exist.

"the death of Satan was a tragedy for the imagination"
   -- Wallace Stevens