Re: Re: US-UK split now public

2002-07-03 Thread Chris Burford

At 02/07/02 10:02 -0400, Proyect wrote:
Burford:
 What is so significant about this split over immunity of allied
 occupation forces in Bosnia from potential prosecution by the new
 International Criminal Court, which the US refuses to recognise, is that
 this is a split in the position of bodies of armed men in relation to
 international law.

There is nothing particularly new about this. The European powers tend to
be less barbaric than the USA. During Reagan's war against Nicaragua, they
endorsed the verdict of the World Court that the US broke international law
when it mined the harbors of Managua. They also tended to be critical of
the war in Vietnam.

However, this has little to do with armed men in relation to international
law. The USA and Europe play hard cop and soft cop respectively to the 3rd
world. Take Nicaragua for example. While the USA organized killings and
economic blockade to make the FSLN cry uncle, the Europeans were putting
pressure on them to abandon their socialist perspectives.


I agree with the broad description of hard cop and soft cop. These are two 
types of imperialist policies that relate to the different political and 
economic strengths of Europe and the USA. But Blair can no longer always 
bridge that contradiction.

And I assert there is indeed something new in world history and even more 
important, about this. Global juridical forms are being created in front of 
our eyes. These are important components of a future world state in 
creation.  The USA and Europe are in contention about which model is to 
prevail. The result will be determined by the resultant of forces.

My prediction is that the European model will prevail over the next decade 
at the latest. It will do so by small consensual advances. The US-Bush 
first-strike model will magnify the effect of the USA's overwhelming 
military advantage but it will get bogged down in complaints about bombing 
weddings. Its imperialist rivals do not have to confront it directly in 
order to defeat it. They can gossip and outmanoeuvre.

It is important we grasp what is new in this: in the course of this 
contradiction, indeed dialectically, a world state is being created. (in 
the interests of course, of imperialism)

Chris Burford

London






US-UK split now public

2002-07-02 Thread Chris Burford

For the first time Tony Blair has publically split with Bush and voted with 
Europe.


Europe seethes as defiant US goes its own way

White House threat to pull out of UN peacekeeping the latest in a series 
of quarrels shaking transatlantic alliance

Richard Norton-Taylor, Ewen MacAskill, and Ian Black in Brussels Tuesday 
July 2, 2002 The Guardian

America's European allies expressed deep regret yesterday over US 
threats to pull out of UN peacekeeping operations, the latest in a string 
of disputes shaking the transatlantic alliance.

The Bush administration said it would not budge in its opposition to the 
new international criminal court, which was created yesterday. Threatening 
to block a renewed mandate for the Bosnian peacekeeping force, it argues 
that the ICC could be a forum for politically motivated actions against 
its troops serving overseas.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/bush/story/0,7369,747743,00.html


On Sunday the Telgraph featured a major story about UK government 
criticisms of Bush. One unattributed but no doubt senior spokesperson is 
quoted as saying words to the effect of you have got to remember that this 
is a rather unpleasant administration - the fact that we generally try to 
support it does not change that fact.

There are also criticisms of blundering US military tactics.

Although the Conservative Party has not signalled agreement, it has not 
rushed to the defence of Bush, and the article placed with th e Telegraph 
will have its effect on Conservative thinking.

Prominent members of the Liberal party are dissociating themselves from the 
US strategy, and giving cover and support to the British government.

Hugo Young, a significant figure close to the thinking of New Labour, has a 
contemptuous article about the Bush strategy also in today's Guardian.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/bush/story/0,7369,747744,00.html

The tide of estrangement from Bush's US across the political arena in the 
UK cannot be over-estimated, and is beginning to counterbalance the caution 
shown towards Europe.

What is so significant about this split over immunity of allied 
occupation forces in Bosnia from potential prosecution by the new 
International Criminal Court, which the US refuses to recognise, is that 
this is a split in the position of bodies of armed men in relation to 
international law.

The Europeans will take over the armed forces in the Balkans entirely, 
while the Bush administration increasingly asserts the right to first stike 
options by its forces anywhere and at any time to defend itself and its 
values against terrorism.

This is a significant moment at which Britain is falling in with Europe 
politically, juridically, and financially. The impending global econmic 
crisis no doubt concentrates everyones minds.

There will not be an immediate war. (see Hari Kumar's question)  But we 
could be only a few years away from the time when armed forces of Europe 
and armed forces of the USA find themselves in the same area of the world, 
not even as *nominal* allies.

Chris Burford

London










Re: US-UK split now public

2002-07-02 Thread Louis Proyect

Burford:
What is so significant about this split over immunity of allied 
occupation forces in Bosnia from potential prosecution by the new 
International Criminal Court, which the US refuses to recognise, is that 
this is a split in the position of bodies of armed men in relation to 
international law.

There is nothing particularly new about this. The European powers tend to
be less barbaric than the USA. During Reagan's war against Nicaragua, they
endorsed the verdict of the World Court that the US broke international law
when it mined the harbors of Managua. They also tended to be critical of
the war in Vietnam.

However, this has little to do with armed men in relation to international
law. The USA and Europe play hard cop and soft cop respectively to the 3rd
world. Take Nicaragua for example. While the USA organized killings and
economic blockade to make the FSLN cry uncle, the Europeans were putting
pressure on them to abandon their socialist perspectives.

Louis Proyect
Marxism mailing list: http://www.marxmail.org