Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 10:49:03PM +0200, Tels wrote: >> On 02-Oct-01 Michael G Schwern tried to scribble about: >> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 04:34:34PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote: >> >> Running tests for ExtUtils::MakeMaker >> >> t/ExtUtils....ok >> >> All tests successful. >> >> Files=1, Tests=27, 7 wallclock secs ( 5.93 cusr + 1.15 csys = >> >> 7.08 CPU) >> > >> > Come to think of it, does anyone find that benchmarking information >> > particularly useful either? >> >> Me. It doesn't hurt, > >Well, it does. It's more junk that obscures the true purpose, which >is reporting the success or failure of the test.
I like it - I certainly want to see the Files/Tests info - and I agree the rest does not hurt. > > >> and enabling it everytime you need it sounds like pain. > >If you want it, you can just keep TEST_HARNESS_BENCH environment >variable enabled or something. > >How often do you really need it? > > >-- > >Michael G. Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ >Perl6 Quality Assurance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kwalitee Is Job One >"Let's face it," said bearded Rusty Simmons, opening a can after the >race. "This is a good excuse to drink some beer." At 10:30 in the >morning? "Well, it's past noon in Dublin," said teammate Mike >[Joseph] Schwern. "It's our duty." > -- "Sure, and It's a Great Day for Irish Runners" > Newsday, Sunday, March 20, 1988 -- Nick Ing-Simmons http://www.ni-s.u-net.com/
