Re: Update on untested modules
Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The ones that bother me are the Pod::* tests. I know Pod::Parser's CPAN > version has tests. Pod::Text & Pod::Man (the podulators), > unfortunately, do not. Pod::LaTeX only has a compile test. I'd love it if someone would generalize the Pod::Parser test framework so that it would work for Pod::Man as well and the other Pod::Text modules; it already knows how to test Pod::Text. I'd happily include any such port into podlators. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Re: Make Schwern Poor before 5.8.0
Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Here's something that would be nice to get done, finish off testing > last three dozen modules and let YAS have $500 of my money. > http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/cgi-bin/perl-qa-wiki.cgi?UntestedModules > It's almost like that game show, "Win Lincoln Stein's Money" It looks like Pod::Find and Pod::Checker have tests already in the current tree in t/pod. Pod::InputObjects is used by Pod::Parser so it's *partly* tested, although not directly tested. I think there may be tests for Pod::Usage there also. I'm currently working on Pod::Man, Pod::Text*, and Pod::ParseLink. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Re: [ID 20010910.013] Perl 5.61 compile problem
Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I didn't know it was NCR UNIX. Wow. I've never even heard of that. I > thought we were up against something fairly sane. I've heard of it. I believe it's a fairly stock SVr4. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
