Re: PathTools 3.10 released

2005-09-12 Thread Ken Williams


On Sep 12, 2005, at 4:22 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:


On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 07:39:46PM -0500, Ken Williams wrote:

I thought I supplied an implementation with that.


Yes - your implementation worked for everything except /.. - /, 
so
I just added one line that did that.  The rest of the implementation 
is

yours verbatim.


Oh, ok.  The wording of your original post made it sound like you had 
to

implement the whole thing.


Yeah, you're right.  I think when I wrote that summary I had forgotten 
how the exchange went, but prospective was the wrong word to use.


 -Ken



Re: PathTools 3.10 released

2005-09-12 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 07:39:46PM -0500, Ken Williams wrote:
 I thought I supplied an implementation with that.
 
 Yes - your implementation worked for everything except /.. - /, so 
 I just added one line that did that.  The rest of the implementation is 
 yours verbatim.

Oh, ok.  The wording of your original post made it sound like you had to
implement the whole thing.


 I'm not sure why I needed to add that case  you didn't see a failure 
 on your side, though.

Cuz I didn't check for it? :)


-- 
Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~schwern
Life is like a sewer - what you get out of it depends on what you put into it.
- Tom Lehrer


Re: PathTools 3.10 released

2005-09-11 Thread Ken Williams


On Sep 10, 2005, at 11:31 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:


On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 10:31:03PM -0500, Ken Williams wrote:

I finally found time to implement the code for the prospective tests
that Schwern added to File::Spec, so I uploaded 3.10 to CPAN.  Should
be hitting mirrors now.


Which prospective tests were those?



The canonpath(foo/..) stuff on Win32, I guess.

 -Ken



Re: PathTools 3.10 released

2005-09-11 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 08:25:24AM -0500, Ken Williams wrote:
 On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 10:31:03PM -0500, Ken Williams wrote:
 I finally found time to implement the code for the prospective tests
 that Schwern added to File::Spec, so I uploaded 3.10 to CPAN.  Should
 be hitting mirrors now.
 
 Which prospective tests were those?
 
 The canonpath(foo/..) stuff on Win32, I guess.

I thought I supplied an implementation with that.


-- 
Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~schwern
Life is like a sewer - what you get out of it depends on what you put into it.
- Tom Lehrer


Re: PathTools 3.10 released

2005-09-11 Thread Ken Williams


On Sep 11, 2005, at 6:05 PM, Michael G Schwern wrote:


On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 08:25:24AM -0500, Ken Williams wrote:

On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 10:31:03PM -0500, Ken Williams wrote:

I finally found time to implement the code for the prospective tests
that Schwern added to File::Spec, so I uploaded 3.10 to CPAN.  
Should

be hitting mirrors now.


Which prospective tests were those?


The canonpath(foo/..) stuff on Win32, I guess.


I thought I supplied an implementation with that.


Yes - your implementation worked for everything except /.. - /, so 
I just added one line that did that.  The rest of the implementation is 
yours verbatim.


I'm not sure why I needed to add that case  you didn't see a failure 
on your side, though.


 -Ken



Re: PathTools 3.10 released

2005-09-10 Thread Michael G Schwern
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 10:31:03PM -0500, Ken Williams wrote:
 I finally found time to implement the code for the prospective tests 
 that Schwern added to File::Spec, so I uploaded 3.10 to CPAN.  Should 
 be hitting mirrors now.

Which prospective tests were those?


-- 
Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~schwern



Re: PathTools 3.10 released

2005-08-27 Thread Rafael Garcia-Suarez
On 8/26/05, Ken Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 I finally found time to implement the code for the prospective tests
 that Schwern added to File::Spec, so I uploaded 3.10 to CPAN.  Should
 be hitting mirrors now.

Thanks, integrated to blead as change #25534.
Note:
File::Spec::Mac in bleadperl has local changes (typos in
documentation) that you haven't integrated yet.


Re: PathTools 3.10 released

2005-08-27 Thread Ken Williams


On Aug 27, 2005, at 12:26 PM, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:


Thanks, integrated to blead as change #25534.
Note:
File::Spec::Mac in bleadperl has local changes (typos in
documentation) that you haven't integrated yet.



Thanks, I'll patch that into my local copy and it'll be fixed when I 
release next.


 -Ken



Re: PathTools 3.10 released

2005-08-27 Thread Ken Williams


On Aug 27, 2005, at 7:35 PM, Ken Williams wrote:



On Aug 27, 2005, at 12:26 PM, Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:


Thanks, integrated to blead as change #25534.
Note:
File::Spec::Mac in bleadperl has local changes (typos in
documentation) that you haven't integrated yet.



Thanks, I'll patch that into my local copy and it'll be fixed when I 
release next.


Actually, I'll release a 3.11 now, because apparently some people don't 
like the fact that the version number 3.10 looks a lot like 3.1.


 -Ken



PathTools 3.10 released

2005-08-25 Thread Ken Williams

Hi,

I finally found time to implement the code for the prospective tests 
that Schwern added to File::Spec, so I uploaded 3.10 to CPAN.  Should 
be hitting mirrors now.


 -Ken