what slow could be in Compress::Zlib? (was RE: 5.004_xx in the wi ld?)

2005-07-04 Thread Konovalov, Vadim 
 I've just been through the should-I-shouldn't-I-support-5.4 with my
 (painfully slow) rewrite of Compress::Zlib. In the end I 

...

I always thought that Compress::Zlib is just a wrapper around zlib which in
turn is C and developed elsewhere (and in stable state for a long time now).

What is (painfully slow) rewrite?

Re: what slow could be in Compress::Zlib? (was RE: 5.004_xx in the wi ld?)

2005-07-04 Thread David Landgren 

Konovalov, Vadim wrote:

I've just been through the should-I-shouldn't-I-support-5.4 with my
(painfully slow) rewrite of Compress::Zlib. In the end I 



...

I always thought that Compress::Zlib is just a wrapper around zlib which in
turn is C and developed elsewhere (and in stable state for a long time now).

What is (painfully slow) rewrite?


I think Paul means that it is taking him a long time to write the code, 
not that the code itself is slow.


David

RE: what slow could be in Compress::Zlib? (was RE: 5.004_xx in the wi ld?)

2005-07-04 Thread Paul Marquess 
From: David Landgren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 Konovalov, Vadim wrote:
 I've just been through the should-I-shouldn't-I-support-5.4 with my
 (painfully slow) rewrite of Compress::Zlib. In the end I
 
 
  ...
 
  I always thought that Compress::Zlib is just a wrapper around zlib which
 in
  turn is C and developed elsewhere (and in stable state for a long time
 now).
 
  What is (painfully slow) rewrite?
 
 I think Paul means that it is taking him a long time to write the code,
 not that the code itself is slow.

Correct. Looks like I answered the wrong question :-)

Paul





___ 
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail 
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com