Re: [perl #46821] [TODO] [Pir] Recursive calls on ResizablePMCArrays fail. Is this what we want?

2009-02-19 Thread chromatic
On Wednesday 24 October 2007 13:52:33 Paul Cochrane wrote:

 In t/src/ro.t there is the todo item:

 # XXX: should this work?

 and the related pir code:

 # three = 4 # should fail -- is that what we want

 The question is: is the behaviour encapsulated in the test actually what we
 want?

The real question is Should setting the read-only property on a 
ResizablePMCArray set the contained PMCs to read-only as well?

I can fix the test (answer no) or I can fix the code (answer yes).  I just 
can't tell you which behavior is most correct.

-- c


Re: [perl #53396] [BUG] Miscellaneous test failures on Windows

2009-02-19 Thread ajr

 Could I ask that either the requestor or somebody else with an
 appropriate system verify my results?

That one's so old I'd fogotten about it. I've been running tests over the
last 9 months, so I think we can consider that closed.




--

Email and shopping with the feelgood factor!
55% of income to good causes. http://www.ippimail.com