Re: [perl #48010] [RFC] [DEPRECATED] print_newline opcode

[Allison Randal]

Will Coleda (via RT) wrote:


 print_newline 


I vote we kill it.


+1

Allison

[perl #48010] [RFC] [DEPRECATED] print_newline opcode

[via RT]

# New Ticket Created by  Will Coleda 
# Please include the string:  [perl #48010]
# in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. 
# URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=48010 


 print_newline 

is the same as 

 say '' 

I vote we kill it. If we must, we can add a say variant that takes no args 
that does the same thing.

Re: [perl #48010] [RFC] [DEPRECATED] print_newline opcode

[chromatic]

On Saturday 01 December 2007 13:45:57 Will Coleda wrote:

  print_newline

 is the same as

  say ''

 I vote we kill it. If we must, we can add a say variant that takes no args
 that does the same thing.

+1 for removing duplicate features.

-- c

Re: [perl #48010] [RFC] [DEPRECATED] print_newline opcode

[Patrick R. Michaud]

On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 01:45:57PM -0800, Will Coleda wrote:
 # New Ticket Created by  Will Coleda 
 # Please include the string:  [perl #48010]
 # in the subject line of all future correspondence about this issue. 
 # URL: http://rt.perl.org/rt3/Ticket/Display.html?id=48010 
 
 
  print_newline 
 
 is the same as 
 
  say '' 
 
 I vote we kill it. If we must, we can add a say variant that takes no args 
 that does the same thing.

+1

I vote we kill it also.  Besides 'say', there's always

print \n

Pm