Re: Complete failure on Linux/PowerPC with 64bit ints.
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 04:30:34AM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote: And all of the tests fail with This isn't Parrot bytecode! That's what I like to see. Thanks. -- I've looked at the listing, and it's right! -- Joel Halpern
Re: Complete failure on Linux/PowerPC with 64bit ints.
On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Michael G Schwern wrote: But if we run Configure.pl with bleadperl that *does* use 64bit ints and has debugging flags on, there's trouble. And all of the tests fail with This isn't Parrot bytecode! That's because assemble.pl hasn't been patched yet to use the right pack_type. You can either apply my patch from yesterday or you can hand-patch the pack_type for 'i' to be 'q'. Once you do that, you'll probably still get lots of failures of the form Error: Control left bounds of byte-code block (now at location -234894350)! -- Andy Dougherty [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dept. of Physics Lafayette College, Easton PA 18042
Re: Complete failure on Linux/PowerPC with 64bit ints.
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 09:03:45AM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote: On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Michael G Schwern wrote: But if we run Configure.pl with bleadperl that *does* use 64bit ints and has debugging flags on, there's trouble. And all of the tests fail with This isn't Parrot bytecode! That's because assemble.pl hasn't been patched yet to use the right pack_type. You can either apply my patch from yesterday or you can hand-patch the pack_type for 'i' to be 'q'. This one? http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg04540.html -- Michael G. Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ Perl6 Quality Assurance [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kwalitee Is Job One Death follows me like a wee followey thing. -- Quakeman
RE: Complete failure on Linux/PowerPC with 64bit ints.
Don't forget that this patch requires the configure patch by Brent that was just a couple of messages back. -Original Message- From: Michael G Schwern To: Andy Dougherty Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 9/20/2001 8:22 AM Subject: Re: Complete failure on Linux/PowerPC with 64bit ints. On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 09:03:45AM -0400, Andy Dougherty wrote: On Thu, 20 Sep 2001, Michael G Schwern wrote: But if we run Configure.pl with bleadperl that *does* use 64bit ints and has debugging flags on, there's trouble. And all of the tests fail with This isn't Parrot bytecode! That's because assemble.pl hasn't been patched yet to use the right pack_type. You can either apply my patch from yesterday or you can hand-patch the pack_type for 'i' to be 'q'. This one? http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg04540.html -- Michael G. Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/ Perl6 Quality Assurance [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kwalitee Is Job One Death follows me like a wee followey thing. -- Quakeman
Re: Complete failure on Linux/PowerPC with 64bit ints.
On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 09:22:50AM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote: That's because assemble.pl hasn't been patched yet to use the right pack_type. You can either apply my patch from yesterday or you can hand-patch the pack_type for 'i' to be 'q'. This one? http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg04540.html It's applied; just resync. -- I want you to know that I create nice things like this because it pleases the Author of my story. If this bothers you, then your notion of Authorship needs some revision. But you can use perl anyway. :-) - Larry Wall
Re: Complete failure on Linux/PowerPC with 64bit ints.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andy Dougherty) writes: [...] That's because assemble.pl hasn't been patched yet to use the right pack_type. You can either apply my patch from yesterday [...] If you sign up for an account at http://dev.perl.org/auth/account I am sure that Dan and Simon will let me flip the cvs access bit for you. =) -- ask bjoern hansen, http://ask.netcetera.dk/ !try; do();
