Warnocks Dilemma (was Maybe [PATCH] move some stuff out of io.h to io_privat.h)
Hello, last week I send in a patch which creates io/io_private.h, but nobody replied to it. The classical Warnock's Dilemma. I have the strange feeling that its because nobody read my mail, because sometimes the p6i mailinglist does not like mail with attachments. But otherwise it made its way to http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.perl6.internals/17670 so somebody should have read it. Anyway, I can resend it, resend it with the patch inline or put it in the bug-tracker. What should I do? bye boe -- Juergen Boemmels[EMAIL PROTECTED] Fachbereich Physik Tel: ++49-(0)631-205-2817 Universitaet Kaiserslautern Fax: ++49-(0)631-205-3906 PGP Key fingerprint = 9F 56 54 3D 45 C1 32 6F 23 F6 C7 2F 85 93 DD 47
Re: Warnocks Dilemma (was Maybe [PATCH] move some stuff out of io.h to io_privat.h)
Juergen Boemmels [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, last week I send in a patch which creates io/io_private.h, but nobody replied to it. The classical Warnock's Dilemma. I have the strange feeling that its because nobody read my mail, Sorry, forgot about that patch. Applied, thanks for your patches and the reminder ;-) leo
Re: Warnocks Dilemma (was Maybe [PATCH] move some stuff out of io.h to io_privat.h)
Juergen Boemmels [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I have the strange feeling that its because nobody read my mail, because sometimes the p6i mailinglist does not like mail with attachments. That's ezmlm-idx which doesn't like Gnus' minimalistic approach to Content-type in text-attachments. I've patched my Gnus to be slightly more verbose, which has fixed it for me (as seen in this message). Fixing ezmlm-idx is a bit more demanding... --- mml.el~ Tue Apr 29 02:52:48 2003 +++ mml.el Sun Aug 3 01:12:00 2003 @@ -54,6 +54,10 @@ :type '(repeat (symbol :tag Parameter)) :group 'message) +(defvar mml-insert-mime-headers-always nil + If non-nil, always put at least Content-Type: text/plain at the top +of MIME parts. It's necessary to work against a bug in ezmlm.) + (defvar mml-tweak-type-alist nil A list of (TYPE . FUNCTION) for tweaking MML parts. TYPE is a string containing a regexp to match the MIME type. FUNCTION @@ -608,7 +612,8 @@ (when (or charset parameters flowed - (not (equal type mml-generate-default-type))) + (not (equal type mml-generate-default-type)) + mml-insert-mime-headers-always) (when (consp charset) (error Can't encode a part with several charsets.)) -- Lars Balker Rasmussen Consult::Perl
Re: Warnocks Dilemma (was Maybe [PATCH] move some stuff out of io.h to io_privat.h)
On 28 Aug 2003, Juergen Boemmels wrote: Hello, last week I send in a patch which creates io/io_private.h, but nobody replied to it. The classical Warnock's Dilemma. I have the strange feeling that its because nobody read my mail, because sometimes the p6i mailinglist does not like mail with attachments. But otherwise it made its way to http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.perl6.internals/17670 so somebody should have read it. I see Leo's got the patch in, but... have we gotten you CVS access yet? You're the defacto IO maintainer at the moment, so it'd make sense to do so. Dan
Re: Warnocks Dilemma (was Maybe [PATCH] move some stuff out of io.h to io_privat.h)
Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see Leo's got the patch in, but... have we gotten you CVS access yet? You're the defacto IO maintainer at the moment, so it'd make sense to do so. Yep. Juergen's patches are fine, I second that. Dan leo
Re: Warnocks Dilemma (was Maybe [PATCH] move some stuff out of io.h to io_privat.h)
At 12:04 PM 8/28/2003 +0200, Juergen Boemmels wrote: Hello, last week I send in a patch which creates io/io_private.h, but nobody replied to it. The classical Warnock's Dilemma. I have the strange feeling that its because nobody read my mail, because sometimes the p6i mailinglist does not like mail with attachments. But otherwise it made its way to http://nntp.x.perl.org/group/perl.perl6.internals/17670 so somebody should have read it. Actually I reviewed it and didn't have an issues so I didn't respond. I assumed you already had CVS commit access. If not, you should. -Melvin
Re: Warnocks Dilemma (was Maybe [PATCH] move some stuff out of io.h to io_privat.h)
At 3:53 PM +0200 8/28/03, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Dan Sugalski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I see Leo's got the patch in, but... have we gotten you CVS access yet? You're the defacto IO maintainer at the moment, so it'd make sense to do so. Yep. Juergen's patches are fine, I second that. I put in the request, and it's been taken care of. Juergen's now got checkin privs--lucky him. :) -- Dan --it's like this--- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
