Re: eof opcode
Fair enough. However, shouldn't the rest of the opcodes with an IO object as their parameter be methods as well? Its not a lot of ops, but it would trim down the core a bit. Brian On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 08:00 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Brian Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I noticed a hole in the io.ops where the PIO stuff wasn't covered. This patch creates an eof opcode which checks for end of file. Please just use the eof method of the PIO object: $I0 = $P0.eof() leo -- brian wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: eof opcode
At 12:23 PM -0500 11/29/04, brian wheeler wrote: Fair enough. However, shouldn't the rest of the opcodes with an IO object as their parameter be methods as well? Its not a lot of ops, but it would trim down the core a bit. They should -- it'll make it easier to abstract things out later when people start wanting to do bizarre things with pseudo-filehandles. On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 08:00 +0100, Leopold Toetsch wrote: Brian Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I noticed a hole in the io.ops where the PIO stuff wasn't covered. This patch creates an eof opcode which checks for end of file. Please just use the eof method of the PIO object: $I0 = $P0.eof() -- Dan --it's like this--- Dan Sugalski even samurai [EMAIL PROTECTED] have teddy bears and even teddy bears get drunk
Re: eof opcode
Brian Wheeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I noticed a hole in the io.ops where the PIO stuff wasn't covered. This patch creates an eof opcode which checks for end of file. Please just use the eof method of the PIO object: $I0 = $P0.eof() leo
