Re: FW: Periodic Table of the Operators

2004-06-01 Thread Mark J. Reed

 How are those without a US keyboard supposed to type this?

I assume you mean with a US keyboard?  US keyboards don't have ¥.
You can use  zip  if you want ASCII.  Otherwise, it depends.  But Yen is
Unicode codepoint U+00A5 = 165 decimal, so you can type it in Windows as ALT +
numpad 0165 even without any international keyboard layout.  If you
use vim, then you can use control-V (control-Q on Windows)  1 6 5
(or u 0 0 a 5), or the Ye digraph (control-K Y e, or, if you have the digraph
option set, Ybackspacee).

-Mark


Re: Predicting Operators

2004-06-01 Thread Aaron Sherman
On Fri, 2004-05-28 at 02:26, Mark Lentczner wrote:
 It is clear that there is a missing list 
 concatenate operator, and that its spelling should be ~~.  Alas, that 
 is already taken by smart match.  On the other hand, perhaps comma 
 fills this role - though I couldn't find my way through the discussion 
 on comma to know where it now stands.

Actually, since comma is now an operator for list construction, I
suppose ,= would certainly have a clear enough meaning.

Still, I'm not sure everything needs to be operatorified. Is push so
hard to use?

-- 
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me down!' -Shriekback




Re: FW: Periodic Table of the Operators

2004-06-01 Thread Aaron Sherman
On Sat, 2004-05-29 at 19:04, Gabriel Ebner wrote:
 Hello,
 
 Joe Gottman wrote:
 The zip operator is now the Yen sign (¥).
 
 How are those without a US keyboard supposed to type this?

Well, first off my US keyboard doesn't contain it. Second, you're not
supposed to. ¥ is a shorthand for zip, and if you don't want to use
the funky one-character operator, just use the afunked three-character
one.

-- 
Aaron Sherman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Systems Engineer and Toolsmith
It's the sound of a satellite saying, 'get me down!' -Shriekback




Re: FW: Periodic Table of the Operators

2004-06-01 Thread Gabriel Ebner
Hello,

Mark J. Reed wrote:
 I assume you mean with a US keyboard?  US keyboards don't have .

Oops, must have mistakenly picked an US-International chart, sorry.

Gabriel.

-- 
Gabriel Ebner - reverse [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FW: Periodic Table of the Operators

2004-06-01 Thread Gabriel Ebner
Hello,

Aaron Sherman wrote:
 Well, first off my US keyboard doesn't contain it.

Sorry, mistakenly picked an US-International chart.

 Second, you're not supposed to.

So why has it been chosen then?

  is a shorthand for zip,

Good to know.

 and if you don't want to use the funky one-character operator,

Would I complain if didn't want to?

 just use the afunked three-character one.

Or just use vim as many (helpful) posts noted.

Gabriel.

-- 
Gabriel Ebner - reverse [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: FW: Periodic Table of the Operators

2004-06-01 Thread Paul Seamons
Or for the few Perl emacs people out there:

C-x 8 Y
C-x 8 
C-x 8 

Paul

On Tuesday 01 June 2004 10:27 am, Gabriel Ebner wrote:
 Hello,

 Aaron Sherman wrote:
  Well, first off my US keyboard doesn't contain it.

 Sorry, mistakenly picked an US-International chart.

  Second, you're not supposed to.

 So why has it been chosen then?

   is a shorthand for zip,

 Good to know.

  and if you don't want to use the funky one-character operator,

 Would I complain if didn't want to?

  just use the afunked three-character one.

 Or just use vim as many (helpful) posts noted.

 Gabriel.


Re: FW: Periodic Table of the Operators

2004-06-01 Thread Mark J. Reed

On 2004-06-01 at 14:10:08, Paul Seamons wrote:
 Or for the few Perl emacs people out there:
 
 C-x 8 Y
 C-x 8 
 C-x 8 

I suspect there are more than a few.  I don't think there's anything
constitutional about folks who like Emacs that prevents them from liking
Perl or vice-versa.  Even though (e)lisp is about as orthogonal as you can get
and therefore something of a philosophical opposite to Perl. :)

Since you've added « and » to the list above, I'll add them as well:

CodepointDecimalVim Digraph
«   U+00AB   171
»   U+00B1   177

Details again: you can always enter chars into Windows by holding down
the ALT key and typing 0 plus the decimal code point on the numeric
keypad, or into Vim by hitting control-V (control-Q in vim on Windows,
since control-V is Paste) followed by either the decimal code point (no
leading 0) or the letter u plus the hexadecimal code point.  
Vim digraphs are entered via control-K plus the two characters, or
by setting the 'digraph' option and then typing the two characters
separated by a backspace.

-Mark


Re: [Poop-group] Perl 6 Periodic Table of the Operators

2004-06-01 Thread David Nicol
So is he going to backport his representational ideography to
the operators of perl 5.8?
Darren Duncan wrote:
Mark Lentczner has just (on May 26/28) created a useful/humerous 
graphical diagram of the 100+ operators in the Perl 6 language, designed 
to look like the periodic table of atomic elements.

It's well worth a look:
http://www.ozonehouse.com/mark/blog/code/PeriodicTable.html
He announced it to perl6-language[at]perl.org on May 26th, and it was 
announced on Slashdot today.  For those of you not reading either of 
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There's a fine line between participation and mockery -- Scott Adams