Re: [perl6/specs] 761178: remove some some duplicate words words
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 9/8/10 14:24 , Patrick R. Michaud wrote: On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 04:02:10PM +0400, Richard Hainsworth wrote: I do want the diffs back: its the only way I have to keep at least some idea of what is changing any why. We know that a lot of people would like to see the diffs available through the commit messages, but afaik none of us actively maintaining the github archive quite know how to make that happen. Something beyond please bring diffs back would be very helpful to us here. Someone earlier suggested something starting with fork this project (github-utils, IIRC); I poked and found myself looking at what appears to be Rails. And I've already got one Rails project making me cross-eyed (I know Ruby but not Rails, so no idea where to start). - -- brandon s. allbery [linux,solaris,freebsd,perl] allb...@kf8nh.com system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allb...@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkyJMDgACgkQIn7hlCsL25XwyQCeNTiMPDlPH+rmtUQ3sIZP9C2f FAYAn38SKAsjeEn0AS2r7A24wOBinglT =As9K -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [perl6/specs] 761178: remove some some duplicate words words
于 2010年09月08日 13:41, Jason Switzer 写道: On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Moritz Lenzmor...@faui2k3.org wrote: Brandon S Allbery KF8NH wrote: On 9/7/10 08:17 , nore...@github.com wrote: Commit: 7611788411e5aff5f3ae150e2da9929ee546d6d8 http://github.com/perl6/specs/commit/7611788411e5aff5f3ae150e2da9929ee546d6d8 It was nicer when these contained the actual diffs like they used to, instead of forcing me to go poke at the tree. Indeed. Any contributions to restoring that behavior are very welcome. I'm surprised anyone actually ever read the diff part of the message. I would prefer to never see that feature again. This has a link to the commit, which has a much better diff viewer than plaintext email (hello? 1997 called, they want their change notices back). It links to the actual change and even highlights the changes. Now I'll actually take a moment to sift through the changes. I vote to never see those diff emails ever again. In fact, if the diffs are brought back, I'll just subscribe to the commit feed and skip the email notice all together. I used to read every diff messages before. And I don't want to click any links to just open the web browser for viewing the diff messages. So, given different people have different habits, I suggest to include the diff messages, but only after also including the links to github.
Re: [perl6/specs] 761178: remove some some duplicate words words
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 07:41, Jason Switzer jswit...@gmail.com wrote: I'm surprised anyone actually ever read the diff part of the message. I would prefer to never see that feature again. This has a link to the commit, which has a much better diff viewer than plaintext email (hello? 1997 called, they want their change notices back). In some respects, I want 1997 back, since people learned how to work efficiently rather than not. ;) I both like and can read the contextual diffs just fine. It links to the actual change and even highlights the changes. Yes, it's all very nice, and nothing that needs to go away. Having it both ways can't hurt. Now I'll actually take a moment to sift through the changes. I vote to never see those diff emails ever again. In fact, if the diffs are brought back, I'll just subscribe to the commit feed and skip the email notice all together. That seems like a reasonable solution for you, then. -- Jan
Re: [perl6/specs] 761178: remove some some duplicate words words
I do want the diffs back: its the only way I have to keep at least some idea of what is changing any why. Dont care if I'm called an old foggy either - 1997 wasnt that long ago for me. On 09/08/10 13:32, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote: On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 07:41, Jason Switzerjswit...@gmail.com wrote: I'm surprised anyone actually ever read the diff part of the message. I would prefer to never see that feature again. This has a link to the commit, which has a much better diff viewer than plaintext email (hello? 1997 called, they want their change notices back). In some respects, I want 1997 back, since people learned how to work efficiently rather than not. ;) I both like and can read the contextual diffs just fine. It links to the actual change and even highlights the changes. Yes, it's all very nice, and nothing that needs to go away. Having it both ways can't hurt. Now I'll actually take a moment to sift through the changes. I vote to never see those diff emails ever again. In fact, if the diffs are brought back, I'll just subscribe to the commit feed and skip the email notice all together. That seems like a reasonable solution for you, then.
Re: [perl6/specs] 761178: remove some some duplicate words words
Jason Switzer wrote: On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Moritz Lenz mor...@faui2k3.org wrote: Brandon S Allbery KF8NH wrote: On 9/7/10 08:17 , nore...@github.com wrote: Commit: 7611788411e5aff5f3ae150e2da9929ee546d6d8 http://github.com/perl6/specs/commit/7611788411e5aff5f3ae150e2da9929ee546d6d8 It was nicer when these contained the actual diffs like they used to, instead of forcing me to go poke at the tree. Indeed. Any contributions to restoring that behavior are very welcome. I'm surprised anyone actually ever read the diff part of the message. I would prefer to never see that feature again. This has a link to the commit, which has a much better diff viewer than plaintext email (hello? 1997 called, they want their change notices back). It links to the actual change and even highlights the changes. Now I'll actually take a moment to sift through the changes. I vote to never see those diff emails ever again. In fact, if the diffs are brought back, I'll just subscribe to the commit feed and skip the email notice all together. I like the email diffs and think that both they plus the link to the web diff should be in the emails. Sure, the web page diffs are prettier, but the email diffs are much more convenient, and pretty enough. With the email we don't have to click a link to see what changed. And particularly important, if we want to reply with a *comment* on the diff, it is easy to cite the portions we're commenting on, because a simple reply on the list message has the diffs quoted. -- Darren Duncan
Re: [perl6/specs] 761178: remove some some duplicate words words
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 04:02:10PM +0400, Richard Hainsworth wrote: I do want the diffs back: its the only way I have to keep at least some idea of what is changing any why. We know that a lot of people would like to see the diffs available through the commit messages, but afaik none of us actively maintaining the github archive quite know how to make that happen. Something beyond please bring diffs back would be very helpful to us here. For those who prefer to just have links to the diffs without the text of the diffs, subscribing to the commit RSS feed is probably the best bet. Pm
Re: [perl6/specs] 761178: remove some some duplicate words words
Patrick R. Michaud wrote: On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 04:02:10PM +0400, Richard Hainsworth wrote: I do want the diffs back: its the only way I have to keep at least some idea of what is changing any why. We know that a lot of people would like to see the diffs available through the commit messages, but afaik none of us actively maintaining the github archive quite know how to make that happen. Something beyond please bring diffs back would be very helpful to us here. Currently the Email service hook in github is enabled for the specs repo. They are open source, see http://github.com/github/github-services for details. Somebody could implement the include-the-diff feature, and make the github folks apply the changes. Or somebody could follow the feed and send emails to p6l, in which case I'd disable the service hook. Cheers, Moritz
[perl6/specs] 761178: remove some some duplicate words words
Branch: refs/heads/master Home: http://github.com/perl6/specs Commit: 7611788411e5aff5f3ae150e2da9929ee546d6d8 http://github.com/perl6/specs/commit/7611788411e5aff5f3ae150e2da9929ee546d6d8 Author: Coke w...@coleda.com Date: 2010-09-07 (Tue, 07 Sep 2010) Changed paths: M S05-regex.pod M S12-objects.pod Log Message: --- remove some some duplicate words words
Re: [perl6/specs] 761178: remove some some duplicate words words
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 9/7/10 08:17 , nore...@github.com wrote: Commit: 7611788411e5aff5f3ae150e2da9929ee546d6d8 http://github.com/perl6/specs/commit/7611788411e5aff5f3ae150e2da9929ee546d6d8 It was nicer when these contained the actual diffs like they used to, instead of forcing me to go poke at the tree. - -- brandon s. allbery [linux,solaris,freebsd,perl] allb...@kf8nh.com system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allb...@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon university KF8NH -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkyGY/0ACgkQIn7hlCsL25WxpgCeLjHf3FHIZzpEzy57AWOq/QbS KhUAoJPWUxCmDuEbtjZfrGRNy4/o3Red =h6TB -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [perl6/specs] 761178: remove some some duplicate words words
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 12:10:37PM -0400, Brandon S Allbery KF8NH wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 9/7/10 08:17 , nore...@github.com wrote: Commit: 7611788411e5aff5f3ae150e2da9929ee546d6d8 http://github.com/perl6/specs/commit/7611788411e5aff5f3ae150e2da9929ee546d6d8 It was nicer when these contained the actual diffs like they used to, instead of forcing me to go poke at the tree. If they can't be fixed to include the diffs, I'd prefer that the messages be discontinued. Right now their signal to noise is pretty damn low - presumably anyone who actually wants this lack of detail can subscribe to http://github.com/perl6/specs/commits/master.atom Nicholas Clark
Re: [perl6/specs] 761178: remove some some duplicate words words
Brandon S Allbery KF8NH wrote: On 9/7/10 08:17 , nore...@github.com wrote: Commit: 7611788411e5aff5f3ae150e2da9929ee546d6d8 http://github.com/perl6/specs/commit/7611788411e5aff5f3ae150e2da9929ee546d6d8 It was nicer when these contained the actual diffs like they used to, instead of forcing me to go poke at the tree. Indeed. Any contributions to restoring that behavior are very welcome. Cheers, Moritz
Re: [perl6/specs] 761178: remove some some duplicate words words
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Moritz Lenz mor...@faui2k3.org wrote: Brandon S Allbery KF8NH wrote: On 9/7/10 08:17 , nore...@github.com wrote: Commit: 7611788411e5aff5f3ae150e2da9929ee546d6d8 http://github.com/perl6/specs/commit/7611788411e5aff5f3ae150e2da9929ee546d6d8 It was nicer when these contained the actual diffs like they used to, instead of forcing me to go poke at the tree. Indeed. Any contributions to restoring that behavior are very welcome. I'm surprised anyone actually ever read the diff part of the message. I would prefer to never see that feature again. This has a link to the commit, which has a much better diff viewer than plaintext email (hello? 1997 called, they want their change notices back). It links to the actual change and even highlights the changes. Now I'll actually take a moment to sift through the changes. I vote to never see those diff emails ever again. In fact, if the diffs are brought back, I'll just subscribe to the commit feed and skip the email notice all together. -Jason
