'constitute' is the word. Re: r29540 - docs/Perl6/Spec
Suggest: =head1 Regexes constitute a first-class language, rather than just being strings Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote: On Jan 16, 2010, at 01:47 , pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote: -=head1 Regexes are now first-class language, not strings +=head1 Regexes are now a first-class language, not strings I'm not sure if that's the correct reading, or ...now first-class language [elements]. Or possibly using language as a collective concept (compare `$phrase' is now acceptable language in a natural language context).
Re: r29540 - docs/Perl6/Spec
On Jan 16, 2010, at 01:47 , pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote: -=head1 Regexes are now first-class language, not strings +=head1 Regexes are now a first-class language, not strings I'm not sure if that's the correct reading, or ...now first-class language [elements]. Or possibly using language as a collective concept (compare `$phrase' is now acceptable language in a natural language context). -- brandon s. allbery [solaris,freebsd,perl,pugs,haskell] allb...@kf8nh.com system administrator [openafs,heimdal,too many hats] allb...@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon universityKF8NH PGP.sig Description: This is a digitally signed message part
r29540 - docs/Perl6/Spec
Author: diakopter Date: 2010-01-16 07:47:34 +0100 (Sat, 16 Jan 2010) New Revision: 29540 Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S05-regex.pod Log: [S05] typo?, grammaro? Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S05-regex.pod === --- docs/Perl6/Spec/S05-regex.pod 2010-01-16 06:05:57 UTC (rev 29539) +++ docs/Perl6/Spec/S05-regex.pod 2010-01-16 06:47:34 UTC (rev 29540) @@ -1800,7 +1800,7 @@ =back -=head1 Regexes are now first-class language, not strings +=head1 Regexes are now a first-class language, not strings =over @@ -2605,7 +2605,7 @@ be modified unless you know how to create and propagate match states. All regexes actually return match states even when you think they're returning something else, because the match states keep track of -the success and failures of the pattern for you. +the successes and failures of the pattern for you. Fortunately, when you just want to return a different abstract result along with the default concrete CMatch object, you may associate your return value with