> > in any case, i think we have a fair agreement on rfc 158 and i will > > freeze it if there is no further comments on it. > > I think you should remove the parts of your propsal about making $& be > autolocalized. If you're not planning to revise your RFC, let me know so that I can ask the librarian to mark it as withdrawn.
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Damien Neil
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Philip Newton
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Bart Lateur
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Mark-Jason Dominus
- $& and copying: rfc 158 (was Re: RFC ... Uri Guttman
- Re: $& and copying: rfc 158 (was Re: ... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: $& and copying: rfc 158 (was Re: ... Tom Christiansen
- Re: $& and copying: rfc 158 (was Re: ... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Joe McMahon
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Jonathan Scott Duff
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Nathan Wiger
- Re: RFC 110 (v3) counting matches Bart Lateur