> Simply put, I want variable-length lookbehind. Why didn't you simply propose that the (?<...) operator be fixed to support variable-length expressions? Why so much additional machinery?
- Re: RFC 72 (v1) The regexp engine should go backward as... mike mulligan
- Re: RFC 72 (v1) The regexp engine should go backwa... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: RFC 72 (v1) The regexp engine should go ba... Tom Christiansen
- Re: RFC 72 (v1) The regexp engine should go backward as... Peter Heslin
- Re: RFC 72 (v3) Variable-length lookbehind: the re... mike mulligan
- Re: RFC 72 (v1) The regexp engine should go backwa... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: RFC 72 (v1) The regexp engine should go backwa... Mark-Jason Dominus
- Re: RFC 72 (v3) Variable-length lookbehind: the re... Hugo