Re: RFC 219 (v1) Perl6's License Should Be a Minor Bugfix of Perl5's License
Ben Tilly wrote: > The Perl6 RFC Librarian quoth: > > > >This and other RFCs are available on the web at > > http://dev.perl.org/rfc/ > > > >=head1 TITLE > > > >Perl6's License Should Be a Minor Bugfix of Perl5's License > [...] > This resolves very few of the IMHO rather serious issues I have found with > the current license. The Perl community is unlikely to have such a good > opportunity again for years if not decades. If a good solution can be > decided on, now is clearly the time to do it. I actually do tend to agree with you, but I thought the "minimal change" proposal had some merit, so I thought it deserved an RFC. Just because I wrote the RFC doesn't mean I endorse that plan over some other one. Perhaps I should say that explicitly in the RFC -- Bradley M. Kuhn - http://www.ebb.org/bkuhn PGP signature
Re: RFC 219 (v1) Perl6's License Should Be a Minor Bugfix of Perl5's License
The Perl6 RFC Librarian quoth: > >This and other RFCs are available on the web at > http://dev.perl.org/rfc/ > >=head1 TITLE > >Perl6's License Should Be a Minor Bugfix of Perl5's License [...] This resolves very few of the IMHO rather serious issues I have found with the current license. The Perl community is unlikely to have such a good opportunity again for years if not decades. If a good solution can be decided on, now is clearly the time to do it. Cheers, Ben _ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com.
