Re: Re[2]: anchors - weirdness

2006-07-03 Thread David Diggles

Thanks Daniel,

I'm compiling the patch in now, and I'll try the test anchor unload
sequence without typos this time ;-)

David.


Re[2]: anchors - weirdness

2006-06-29 Thread Boris Polevoy


-Original Message-
From: Daniel Hartmeier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David Diggles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 07:25:04 +0200
Subject: Re: anchors - weirdness

 
 There was a bug that caused anchors defined from sub-anchors with load
 anchor statements to get defined directly in the root, and not relative
 to the position of the anchor defining them. This was fixed in OpenBSD
 just a couple of weeks ago with
 
   
 http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sys/net/pf_table.c.diff?r1=1.67r2=1.68f=h
   
 http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/sbin/pfctl/parse.y.diff?r1=1.497r2=1.498f=h
 
 This isn't in FreeBSD (or OpenBSD -stable) yet, but it probably makes
 sense to pull it in.
 
I have use same pf_table.c patch under FreeBSD 6.0, 6.1 two months. It's work 
well.
To Max Laier: please, patch FreeBSD's PF/pfctl.

With best regards
Boris Polevoy