Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Handling the pg_global of tablespace.
Hiroshi Saito wrote: From: Dave Page [EMAIL PROTECTED] It should still work for superusers though shouldn't it? Eh?, Is it ACL bug of PostgreSQL ver 8.3b1? As for superuser, 2007-10-11 13:53:23 ERROR : ERROR: permission denied for tablespace pg_global Yes, I specifically asked Tom about the superuser case and he responded: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-08/msg01018.php I've reported the problem to pgsql-hackers with the relevant posts. /D ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Handling the pg_global of tablespace.
It should still work for superusers though shouldn't it? /D --- Original Message --- From: Hiroshi Saito [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: pgadmin-hackers@postgresql.org Sent: 11/10/07, 06:01:56 Subject: [pgadmin-hackers] Handling the pg_global of tablespace. Hi All. As for pg_global, handling became difficult for reasons of Ver 8.3 to security. http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-10/msg00448.php Therefore, we have to do this change by this version. A method is considered as follows. 1. pg_global is removed by the handling of a tablespace objects. or 2. consideration of statistics and dependents is disregarded. I want to convert by 1. Is there any objection? or any idea? Regards, Hiroshi Saito ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
[pgadmin-hackers] Handling the pg_global of tablespace.
Hi All. As for pg_global, handling became difficult for reasons of Ver 8.3 to security. http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-10/msg00448.php Therefore, we have to do this change by this version. A method is considered as follows. 1. pg_global is removed by the handling of a tablespace objects. or 2. consideration of statistics and dependents is disregarded. I want to convert by 1. Is there any objection? or any idea? Regards, Hiroshi Saito ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
