Re: [pgadmin-hackers] acinclude.m4 and wx detection question

2005-05-05 Thread Adam H. Pendleton
On May 5, 2005, at 5:23 PM, Raphaël Enrici wrote:

Yes, but how would we go about finding the wx-config file in the
first place?
Aren't the --with-wx* flags you gave to us useable for this ?
I personnaly use them each time I build pga3 like this:
--with-wx=/usr --with-wx-config=wx-config
Absolutely, but the configure script must be able to deal with  
situations in which the user does not pass that flag.  In theory, a  
user should be able to do the following to build pgAdmin3:

./configure
make
make install
Again, you have to find wx-config.  The other problem is that wx
programs will fail if you don't link against the wx libraries.  Since
the wx library names are not reported by wx-config, we have to try
all the possible wx lib names (because they've changed to many  
times).

mmmh, I missed that part of the process, but:
wx-config --libs gives some informations. In my case :
-pthread   -L/usr/X11R6/lib  /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2ud_pga3_xrc-2.6.a
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2ud_pga3_html-2.6.a
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2ud_pga3_adv-2.6.a
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2ud_pga3_core-2.6.a
/usr/lib/libwx_baseud_pga3_xml-2.6.a
/usr/lib/libwx_baseud_pga3_net-2.6.a /usr/lib/libwx_baseud_pga3-2.6.a
-Wl,--export-dynamic -pthread -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0
-lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lpangoxft-1.0 -lpangox-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lgobject-2.0
-lgmodule-2.0 -lgthread-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -lXinerama -lXxf86vm -lpng - 
ljpeg
-ltiff -lexpat -lwxregexud_pga3-2.6 -lz -ldl -lm
See this is new.  wx-config didn't use to return this.  With this  
information I can make the autoconf script much cleaner!

ahp
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend


Re: [pgadmin-hackers] acinclude.m4 and wx detection question

2005-05-05 Thread Raphaël Enrici
Adam H. Pendleton wrote:
> On May 5, 2005, at 4:47 PM, Raphaël Enrici wrote:
> 
> 
>>Hi Adam,
>>
>>I have a small question in mind I never asked concerning the way we
>>check for wxwidgets files installed while in configure scripts (for
>>example stc headers).
>>Why don't we try to build small C or C++ examples which includes the
>>required files and check to see if the build failed instead of
>>hardcoding some test on file existance ? Or maybe we could parse the
>>'-I' outputs of wx-confg --cflags or cxxflags to take as a base for  
>>the
>>tests ?
> 
> 
> We do use the wx-confg output for our basis:
> 
> WX_NEW_LDFLAGS=`${WX_CONFIG} --static --libs`

yes I've seen that the build process is ok and that's a good thing.


>>IMHO we would gain in both portability (it would be easier to take  
>>care
>>of specific configuration) and maintenance (no more change needed to
>>acinclude.m4 if we change the version of wxwidgets we support).
>>
>>As an example, my wx-config outputs is this one:
>> wx-config --cflags
>>-I/usr/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-debug-static-2.6-pga3
>>-I/usr/include/wx-2.6-pga3 -D__WXDEBUG__ -D__WXGTK__
>>-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGE_FILES -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE=1
> 
> 
> Yes, but how would we go about finding the wx-config file in the  
> first place?

Aren't the --with-wx* flags you gave to us useable for this ?
I personnaly use them each time I build pga3 like this:
--with-wx=/usr --with-wx-config=wx-config


>>If I want the configure script to pass with such a configuration, I  
>>must
>>patch acinclude.m4 so that it refers to the correct path. If not, it
>>just fails and tells me that I did not install stc which is not true.
>>
>>If we were trying to detect this with a small program like this:
>>#include 
>>...
>>void main(void) {  }
> 
> 
> Again, you have to find wx-config.  The other problem is that wx  
> programs will fail if you don't link against the wx libraries.  Since  
> the wx library names are not reported by wx-config, we have to try  
> all the possible wx lib names (because they've changed to many times).

mmmh, I missed that part of the process, but:

wx-config --libs gives some informations. In my case :
-pthread   -L/usr/X11R6/lib  /usr/lib/libwx_gtk2ud_pga3_xrc-2.6.a
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2ud_pga3_html-2.6.a
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2ud_pga3_adv-2.6.a
/usr/lib/libwx_gtk2ud_pga3_core-2.6.a
/usr/lib/libwx_baseud_pga3_xml-2.6.a
/usr/lib/libwx_baseud_pga3_net-2.6.a /usr/lib/libwx_baseud_pga3-2.6.a
-Wl,--export-dynamic -pthread -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0
-lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lpangoxft-1.0 -lpangox-1.0 -lpango-1.0 -lgobject-2.0
-lgmodule-2.0 -lgthread-2.0 -lglib-2.0 -lXinerama -lXxf86vm -lpng -ljpeg
-ltiff -lexpat -lwxregexud_pga3-2.6 -lz -ldl -lm


> I'll take another look at this and see if we can't make some  
> improvements, but the acinclude.m4 has to be able to handle all the  
> one-offs, which usually requires a lot of manual checking, but we'll  
> see what we can do!

thanks! :)

Raphaël

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

   http://archives.postgresql.org


Re: [pgadmin-hackers] acinclude.m4 and wx detection question

2005-05-05 Thread Andreas Pflug
Raphaël Enrici wrote:
Hi Adam,
I have a small question in mind I never asked concerning the way we
check for wxwidgets files installed while in configure scripts (for
example stc headers).
Why don't we try to build small C or C++ examples which includes the
required files and check to see if the build failed instead of
hardcoding some test on file existance ? 

Why not, AFAICS many configure scripts already work like this.OTOH, care 
should be taken that non-existence can be separated from other failures.

Regards,
Andreas
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings


Re: [pgadmin-hackers] acinclude.m4 and wx detection question

2005-05-05 Thread Adam H. Pendleton
On May 5, 2005, at 4:47 PM, Raphaël Enrici wrote:
Hi Adam,
I have a small question in mind I never asked concerning the way we
check for wxwidgets files installed while in configure scripts (for
example stc headers).
Why don't we try to build small C or C++ examples which includes the
required files and check to see if the build failed instead of
hardcoding some test on file existance ? Or maybe we could parse the
'-I' outputs of wx-confg --cflags or cxxflags to take as a base for  
the
tests ?
We do use the wx-confg output for our basis:
WX_NEW_LDFLAGS=`${WX_CONFIG} --static --libs`
IMHO we would gain in both portability (it would be easier to take  
care
of specific configuration) and maintenance (no more change needed to
acinclude.m4 if we change the version of wxwidgets we support).

As an example, my wx-config outputs is this one:
 wx-config --cflags
-I/usr/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-debug-static-2.6-pga3
-I/usr/include/wx-2.6-pga3 -D__WXDEBUG__ -D__WXGTK__
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGE_FILES -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE=1
Yes, but how would we go about finding the wx-config file in the  
first place?

If I want the configure script to pass with such a configuration, I  
must
patch acinclude.m4 so that it refers to the correct path. If not, it
just fails and tells me that I did not install stc which is not true.

If we were trying to detect this with a small program like this:
#include 
...
void main(void) {  }
Again, you have to find wx-config.  The other problem is that wx  
programs will fail if you don't link against the wx libraries.  Since  
the wx library names are not reported by wx-config, we have to try  
all the possible wx lib names (because they've changed to many times).

I'll take another look at this and see if we can't make some  
improvements, but the acinclude.m4 has to be able to handle all the  
one-offs, which usually requires a lot of manual checking, but we'll  
see what we can do!

ahp
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
 joining column's datatypes do not match


[pgadmin-hackers] acinclude.m4 and wx detection question

2005-05-05 Thread Raphaël Enrici
Hi Adam,

I have a small question in mind I never asked concerning the way we
check for wxwidgets files installed while in configure scripts (for
example stc headers).
Why don't we try to build small C or C++ examples which includes the
required files and check to see if the build failed instead of
hardcoding some test on file existance ? Or maybe we could parse the
'-I' outputs of wx-confg --cflags or cxxflags to take as a base for the
tests ?

IMHO we would gain in both portability (it would be easier to take care
of specific configuration) and maintenance (no more change needed to
acinclude.m4 if we change the version of wxwidgets we support).

As an example, my wx-config outputs is this one:
 wx-config --cflags
-I/usr/lib/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-debug-static-2.6-pga3
-I/usr/include/wx-2.6-pga3 -D__WXDEBUG__ -D__WXGTK__
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGE_FILES -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE=1

If I want the configure script to pass with such a configuration, I must
patch acinclude.m4 so that it refers to the correct path. If not, it
just fails and tells me that I did not install stc which is not true.

If we were trying to detect this with a small program like this:
#include 
...
void main(void) {  }

After building it successfully with the wx-config --cflags output passed
to the compiler, wouldn't this be sufficient (we may also add a check on
the wx version detected if needed) ?

Tell me if I missed something.

Regards,
Raphaël

---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
  joining column's datatypes do not match